Práticas de citação na Organização e Representação do Conhecimento no Brasil

Rinaldo Ribeiro de Melo; Murilo Silveira; Raimundo Santos

doi:10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78062

Citation practices in Knowledge Organization and Representation in Brazil

Authors

Rinaldo Ribeiro de Melo Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-3005
Murilo Silveira Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-6001
Raimundo Santos Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9208-3266

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78062

Keywords:

Citation studies, Citation practices, Knowledge Organization, Sociocultural Conception, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the production ways and the elements of distinction of the citation practices in the field of Knowledge Organization and Representation in Brazil from 2015 to 2018. The specific objectives are mapping the most productive and cited authors of the period in the domain of Knowledge Organization and Representation and identify the authors' citation reasons of the most cited authors as of their scientific contributions.

Methods: It configures as a contribution of bibliographical and descriptive character. It uses the scientometric method through content and subject analysis techniques to demonstrate the motivations of the citation practices of researchers related to the domain of the Organization and Knowledge Representation.

Results: The predominance of citation in national researchers is evident in the analyzed clipping, with emphasis on the author Fujita, M. S. L. and the author Guimarães, J. A. C. Concerning the reasons for citations, the domain of the conceptual dimension stands out with 93.2%. In contrast, the social dimension appears with only 6.8% of the total occurrences. In the distribution of the reasons for the citations by categories, we can highlight the occurrences aimed at supporting statements and information, which received 1,148 mentions, as well as the reasons aimed at more theoretical and conceptual discussions, with a total of 902 linked reasons.

Conclusions: Considering the forms of production and the instances of consecration pointed out by the binomial production-citation, from the results, the position of the most productive authors in the field reverberated in citations, with plural reasons and motivations concentrated on supporting arguments, exemplifying situations, cases, and points of view, as well as theoretical, conceptual and methodological definitions and clarifications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARBOIT, A. E. O processo de institucionalização sociocognitiva do domínio de Organização do Conhecimento a partir dos trabalhos científicos dos congressos da ISKO. 2014. Tese (Doutorado) – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília, 2014. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/123389. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2021.

BOURDIEU, P. Homo academicus. 2. ed. Florianópolis: Ed. UFSC, 2013.

BOURDIEU, P.; PASSERON, J. A reprodução: elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012.

CAPES. Documento de área: Área 31: Comunicação e Informação. Brasília, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/comunicacao-pdf. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2021.

LEYDESDORFF, L.; AMSTERDAMSKA, O. Dimensions of Citation Analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, New York, v. 15, n. 3, p. 305-335, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016224399001500303. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016224399001500303. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2020.

LEYDESDORFF, L.; WOUTERS, P. Between texts and contexts: advances in theories of citation? (A Rejoinder). Scientometrics, Amsterdam, v. 44, n. 2, p. 169–182, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457378. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02457378. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2020.

LIEVROUW, L. A. New media and the ‘pluralization of life-worlds’. New Media & Society, Los Angeles, CA, v. 3, p. 7-28, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444801003001002. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444801003001002. Acesso em: 2 ago. 2020

MARTINS, G. K. Institucionalização cognitiva e social da Organização e Representação do Conhecimento na Ciência da Informação no Brasil. 2014. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília, 2014. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/114036. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2021.

SILVEIRA, M. A. A.; CAREGNATO, S. E.; BUFREM, L. S. Estudo das razões das citações na Ciência da Informação: proposta de classificação. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, João Pessoa, v. 7, n. 2, p. 232-250, 2014. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/119535. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2019.

SILVEIRA, M. A. A. Produção e distinção no domínio da Organização e Representação do Conhecimento no Brasil. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação e Informação) – Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/153353. Acesso em: 2 mar. 2019.

SILVEIRA, M. A. A.; CAREGNATO, S. E. Demarcações epistemológicas dos estudos de citação: teorias das citações. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 23, p. 250-275, 2017a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245233.250-275. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/view/72870. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2019.

SILVEIRA, M. A. A.; CAREGNATO, S. E. Demarcações epistemológicas dos estudos de citação: o fenômeno da citação. Informação & Sociedade: estudos, João Pessoa, v. 27, p. 145-154, 2017b. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ies/article/view/33847. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2019.

THOMPSON, J. B. Ideologia e cultura moderna: teoria social crítica na era dos meios de comunicação de massa. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-17

How to Cite

MELO, Rinaldo Ribeiro de; SILVEIRA, Murilo; SANTOS, Raimundo. Citation practices in Knowledge Organization and Representation in Brazil. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, [S. l.], v. 26, p. 01–22, 2021. DOI: 10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78062. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78062. Acesso em: 17 may. 2024.

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 years giving voice to Science"

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author must guarantee that:

there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.

Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.

All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.

This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.

Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Any user has the right to:

Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

According to the following terms:

Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.