Chemistry, Society and Uncertainty

Authors

  • Luciana Zaterka Universidade Federal do ABC
  • Ronei Clécio Mocellin Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e82288

Keywords:

chemistry, Society, Values, Technoscience

Abstract

In recent years, besides the increased interest in philosophy of chemistry, we have witnessed a "material turn" in philosophy and the history of sciences with an interest in putting instruments, objects, materials and practices at the core of historical reports. Since its alchemic past, chemistry has worked with and on materials, so that its history is also a "material history". Thus, in the wake of this "material turn", it is up to philosophy and the history of chemistry to perceive the chemical substances, the chemists that create them and the industries that produce them as part of culture, society and politics. This overlap between chemical reasoning and materiality as well as the artificial character of its products makes chemistry an eminently technoscientific science. In this context, we will analyze the most general aspect that led us to identify it as "technoscientific", the hybrid that exists between chemistry and society. With that, we intend to argue in favor of considering the modern societal necessities (material, environmental, and human) with chemistry, in an effort to build a more harmonious relationship, being that it will be long and, maybe, indissoluble. Following that, our aim is to develop a concept that cannot be separated from the capillarity of chemistry in societies and the environment, the imprevisibility and essential uncertainty of the behavior of chemical entities in multiple contexts. Finally, we will highlight some reflections concerning chemical ethics associated with the production and creation of new substances that may become a part of the lifeworld.

References

Assunção, J. & Pesquero, C. R. 1999. Dioxinas e furanos: origens e riscos. Revista Saúde Pública, 33 (55).

Bajpai, P. 2014. Recycling and Deinking of Recoverd Paper. Amestam/Boston/Heidelberg: Elsevier (ebook).

Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Trans. Mark Ritter. London: SAGE Publications.

Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2005. Faut-il avoir peur de la chimie? Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.

Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2009. Les vertiges de la technoscience. Façonner le monde atome par atome. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.

Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2020. L’acident et l’ordinaire. In: Bensaude-Vincent, B. & Eastes, R-E. (Org.). Philosophie de la chimie. Paris: deboeck Superieur, p. 294-99.

Berthollet, C-L. 1790. Essay on the New Method of Bleaching. English Translation. Dublin: Trustees of the Linen and Hempen Manufacture.

Chamizo, J. A. 2013. Technochemistry: One of the chemists’ ways of knowing. Foundations of Chemistry 15; 157-70.

Clarke, C. 2004. The Science of Ice Cream. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Del Re, G. 2001. Ethics and science. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 7 (2): p. 85-102.

Derrida, J. 1968. La pharmacie de Platon. Tel Quel (32).

Hacking, I. 1997 [1983]. Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hoffmann, R. 2000. O mesmo e o não-mesmo. Trans. Roberto Leal Ferreira. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.

Jonas, H. 1985. Técnica, medicina y ética. Trans. Carlos Fortea Gil. Barcelona/Buenos Aires/México: Paidós.

Jonas, H. 2011. O princípio responsabilidade, ensaio de uma ética para a civilizaçãotecnológica. Trans. Marijane Lisboa & Luiz Barros Montez. Rio de Janeiro: PUC Rio, 2011.

Keyser, B. W. 2006. Between Science and Craft: The Case of Berthollet and Dyeing. Annals of Science 47 (3): 213–60.

Kovac, J. 2015. Ethics in Science: The Unique Consequences of Chemistry. Accountability in Research 22 (6): 312-29.

Jonas, H. 2018. The Ethical Chemist. Professionalism and Ethics in Science. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Labarca, M. & Lombardi, O. 2010. Acerca del status ontológico de las entidades químicas: el caso de los orbitales atómicos. Principia 14 (3): 309-33.

Lacey, H. & Mariconda, P. R. 2014. O modelo das interações entre os valores e as atividades científicas. Scientiae studia 12 (4): 643-68.

Lacey, H. 2008. Valores e atividade científica, 2 volumes. São Paulo: Editora 34/Associação Filosófica Scientiae Studia.

Lacey, H. 2011. A imparcialidade da ciência e as responsabilidades dos cientístas. Scientia studia 9 (3): 487-500.

Lacey, H. 2012. Reflections on science and technoscience. Scientiae studia 10 (special issue): 103-28.

Lacey, H. 2014. Tecnociência comercialmente orientada ou investigação multiestratégicas? Scientiæ Studia 12 (4): 669-95.

Latour, B. 2003 [1987]. Science in Action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Lewowicz, L & Lombardi, O. 2013. Stuff versus individuals. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1): 65-77.

Lewowicz, L. 2016. LEMCO: Un coloso de la industria cárnica em Fray Bentos, Uruguay. Montevideo: INAC.

Llored, J. P. 2013. Chimie, chimie quantique, et concept d’emergence: étude d’une mise en relation. Thèse de doctorat souteneu à l’Ecole Polythecnique et à l’Université Libre de Bruxelles. Direction de Michel Bitbol et Isabelle Stengers.

Marcuse, H. 2009. A responsabilidade da ciência. Scientia studia 7 (1): 159-64.

Mariconda, P. R. 2006. O controle da natureza e as origens da dicotomia entre fato e valor. Scientia studia 4 (3): 453-72.

May, P. 2011. Sodium Hypochlorite. http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/bleach/bleachh.htm. Acess: 12/08/2021.

McGrayne, S. B. 2001. Prometheans in the Lab, Chemistry and the Making of the Modern World, New York/Chicago, McGraw-Hill.

Moro, A; Invernizzi, N. 2017. A tragédia da talidomida: a luta pelos direitos das vítimas e por melhor regulação de medicamentos. História, Ciências, Saúde 24 (3): 603-22.

Nunes Neto, N. R. & El-Hani, C. N. 2009. O que é função? Debates na filosofia da biologia contemporânea. Scientiae studia 7 (3) p. 353-401.

Oliveira, M. A; Bermudes, J. A. Z; Souza, A. C. M. 1999. Talidomida no Brasil: vigilância com responsabilidade compartilhada? Caderno. Saúde Pública, 15, (1): 99-112.

Pickstone, J. 2000. Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science. Technology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Riegert, P. Q. 1980. From Arsenic to DDT. A History of Entomology in Western Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Schummer, J. 2001. Ethics of Chemical Synthesis. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 7 (2): 103-24.

Schummer, J.; Bensaude-Vincent, B. & Tiggelen, B. van, (ed.). 2007. The Public Image of Chemistry. New Jersey/London: World Scientific.

Sergeev, G. B. & Klabunde, K. J. 2013 [2006]. Nanochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Sillon, B. 2020. REACH: un outil pour améliorer le dialogue entre chimie et société. In: Bensaude-Vincent, B. & Eastes, R-E. (ed.). Philosophie de la chimie. Paris: deBoeck Superieur, p. 313-17.

Steed. J.; Turner. D. & Wallace, K. 2007. Core Concepts in Supramolecular Chemistry and Nanochemistry. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Teissier, P. 2014. Une histoire de la chimie du solide. Synthèses, formes, identités Paris: Hermann.

Thorsheim, P. 2017. Inventing Pollution. Coal, Smoke, and Culture in Britain since 1800. Athens: Ohio University Press.

Unesco 2011. International Year of Chemistry. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/basic-sciences/chemistry/international-year-of-chemistry/. Acess: 12/08/2012.

Werrett, S. 2019. Thrifty Science. Making the Most of Materials in the History of Expermiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wurster, C. F. 2015. DDT Wars. Rescuing Our National Bird, Preventing Cancer, and Creating the Environmental Defense Fund. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-23

Issue

Section

Special Issue: Science and Values