Kinds of Determinism in Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2019v23n3p503Abstract
Determinism is a doctrine or assumption best defined in the realm of the natural sciences. In this paper I explain in detail the four senses of determinism, from the most fundamental metaphysical sense, to the most complex epistemic (predictive) sense. I take as a starting point the analysis of determinism offered by Stephen Kellert. Each of these senses is then expounded and commented with a view to explore some of the implications of each of them in theoretical physics. The most important of my tasks in this paper is to differentiate between the metaphysical and epistemic consequences of the deterministic assumption. My objective is to show that determinism as an ontological tenet is capable of withstanding criticism, even though predictive determinism is likely to be false.References
Aerts, D. & de Bianchi, M. 2014. The Extended Bloch Representation of Quantum Mechanics and the Hidden-Measurement Solution to the Measurement Problem. Annals of Physics 351: 975-1025.
Barnes, E. 2010. Ontic Vagueness: A Guide for the Perplexed. Noûs 44 (4): 601-27.
Bohm, D. 1952. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’. Physical Review 85 (2): 166-93.
Born, M. 1927. Physical aspects of quantum mechanics. Nature 119 (2992): 354-57.
Boscovich, R. 1966 [1763]. A Theory of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Brandenburger, A. & Yanofsky, N. 2008. A classification of hidden-variable properties. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (42): 425302.
Cassirer, E. 1956. Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. Trans. O. T. Benfey. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chaos. (n.d.) In: D. Harper (ed.), The Online Etymology Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=chaos. Access: 17/04/2014.
Chibeni, S. 2004. Ontic Vagueness in Microphysics. Sorites 15: 29-41.
de Bianchi, M. 2015. Solving the (Quantum) Measurement Problem. https://medium.com/quantum-physics/solving-the-quantum-measurement-problem-5c24c22663b0. Access: 16/05/2019.
Earman, J. 1971. Laplacian Determinism, or is this any way to run a universe? Journal of Philosophy 68 (21): 729-44.
Earman, J. 1986. A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Earman, J. 2004. Determinism: What Have We Learned and What We Still Don’t Know. In: J. Campbell; M. O’Rourke & D. Shier (ed.), Freedom and Determinism, p.21-46. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Earman, J. 2007. Aspects of Determinism in Modern Physics. In: J. Earman & J. Butterfield (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Physics. Part B, p.1369-434. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Earman, J. 2008. How Determinism Can Fail in Classical Physics and How Quantum Physics Can (Sometimes) Provide a Cure. Philosophy of Science 75 (5): 817-29.
Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. (1935) Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review 47 (10): 777-80.
Everett, H. 1957. ‘Relative State’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (3): 454-62.
Fine, A. 2017. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/qt-epr/. Access: 15/05/2019.
French, S. & Krause, D. 2006. Individuality and Non-Individuality in Quantum Mechanics. In: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Analysis, p.139-97. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Glymour, C. 1971. Determinism, Ignorance, and Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophy 68 (21): 744-51.
Hadamard, J. 1923. Lectures on Cauchy’s problem in linear partial differential equations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heylighen, F. 2002. Deterministic Chaos. In: F. Heylighen & V. Turchin (ed.), Principia Cybernetica Web. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CHAOS.html. Access: 22/07/2014.
Keefe, R. & Smith, P. 1997. Introduction: theories of vagueness. In: Vagueness: A Reader, p.1-57. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Kellert, S. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kripke, S. 2000. Identity and Necessity. In: S. Stainton (ed.), Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language: A Concise Anthology, p.93-122. Peterborough (Canada): Broadview Press.
Laplace, S. 1812. Théorie Analytique des Probabilités. Paris: Courcier.
Leibniz, G. 1890 [c.1695]. Von dem Verhängnisse. In: C. J. Gerhardt (ed.), Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Volume VII, p.117-23. Berlin: Weidmann.
Lewis, D. K. 1986 [1979]. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. In: Philosophical Papers. Volume II, p.32-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lorenz, E. N. 1993. The Butterfly Effect. In: The Essence of Chaos, p.179-82. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Lowe, E. J. 1994. Vague Identity and Quantum Indeterminacy. Analysis 54 (2): 110-4.
Lucas, J. R. 1970. General Arguments for and against Determinism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Montague, R. 1974 [1962]. Deterministic Theories. In: R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, p.303-59. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nagel, E. 1961. The structure of Science. New York: Harcourt/Brace/World.
Parsons, T. & Woodruff, P. 1995. Worldly indeterminacy of identity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95: 171-91.
Parsons, T. 2000. Indeterminate Identity: Metaphysics and Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. 1956. The Open Universe. Totowa: Rowman/Littlefield.
Prigogine, I. 1999. The arrow of time. Inaugural lecture of the workshop The Chaotic Universe. http://www.icra.it/publications/books/prigogine/motivation.htm. Access: 01/04/2014.
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto: Bantam.
Reichenbach, H. 1956. Determinism versus Indeterminism in Classical Physics. In: The Direction of Time, p.83-95. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Smith, P. 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Stochastic. 2009. In: The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 4th Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=stochastic&submit.x=51&submit.y=16. Access: 01/04/2014.
Stone, M. 1989. Chaos, Prediction and Laplacean Determinism. American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (2): 123-31.
Styer, D. 1999. Introduction to the Strange World of Quantum Mechanics. http://www.oberlin.edu/physics/dstyer/StrangeQM/intro.html. Access: 12/05/2019.
von Neumann, J. 1955 [1932]. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
