Critique, Ideology and Aufklärung according to Michel Foucault

Authors

  • Pedro Diego Karczmarczyk Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) / Consejo nacional de Investigaciones científicas y técnicas (CONICET) Argentina
  • Norma Beatriz Rodríguez Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) - Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8951.2011v12n100p3

Abstract

We analyze Michel Foucault’s question for the status of critique and its reflexive return over Foucault himself: How Foucault’s discourse, qua critique, should be understood? We will drive two paths: (i) the refusal of the notion of ideology, where the question is: How to think of critique without ideology and truth?; (ii) the Foucauldian recovery of the “critical attitude” (in the texts on Kant’s answer to the question Was ist Aufklärung?) and of the problem of modernity,  along the lines of a “historical ontology of the present”. There is a crossroad of (i) and (ii), since the remarks on a “politics of truth” (as opposite to an “ideology critique” committed with an aseptic truth) reinforces mutually with the problem of the government, faced along the lines of an art of the “voluntary inservitude”. In both cases, practice of criticism that subjectifies desubjugating, poses the question of liberty.

Author Biographies

Pedro Diego Karczmarczyk, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) / Consejo nacional de Investigaciones científicas y técnicas (CONICET) Argentina

Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) /
Consejo nacional de Investigaciones científicas y técnicas (CONICET)
Argentina

Norma Beatriz Rodríguez, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) - Argentina

Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) - Argentina

Published

2011-07-26

Issue

Section

Articles