Industry 4.0: a comparative analisys of German, American, Chinese, South Korean and Japanese experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2020v35n75p113Abstract
The paper presents a comparative analysis of industrial policy strategies of major nations associated with the technological dispute over industry 4.0 emergence (United States, Germany, China, Japan, and South Korea). The national strategies of the selected countries are analyzed based on a cross-sectional and multidimensional approach. It is hypothesized that recent initiatives by central countries for industry 4.0 represent deliberate efforts to push ahead the technological frontier against China's threat to its productive and technological leadership, as well as Chinese consolidation as a central actor in the economic international system.
References
ALLEN, B. G. C. Understanding China ’ s AI Strategy : Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Artificial Intelligence and National Security. n. February, 2019.
ANDREONI, A. Varieties of industrial policy: models, packages and transformation cycles. Columbia university press, 2016.
ARBIX, G. et al. O Brasil e a nova onda de manufatura avançada: o que aprender com a Alemanha, China e Estados Unidos. Novos Estudos - Cebrap, v. 36, n. 3, 2017.
BAILY, M. N.; BOSWORTH, B. P. US Manufacturing: Understanding Its Past and Its Potential Future. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 28, n. 1, p. 3–26, 2014.
BASTASIN, C. Germany: A Global Miracle and a European Challenge. Global Working Papers, n. May, p. 44, 2013.
CHANG, H.-J. ; A. A. M. K. International industrial policy experience and the lessons of the UK. [s.l: s.n.].
CHANG, H.-J.; ANDREONI, A.; KUAN, M. L. International industrial policy experiences and the lessons for the UK. Future of Manufacturing Project, v. 4, p. 76, 2013.
CHEN, S. et al. A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges, and opportunities with China Perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, v. 1, n. 4, p. 349–359, 2014.
CINTRA, M. A.; PINTO, E. C. China em transformação: transição e estratégias de desenvolvimento. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, v. 37, n. 2, p. 381-400, 2017.
COHEN, M. et al. Off- , On- or Reshoring : Benchmarking of Current Manufacturing Location Decisions. Insights from the Global Supply Chain Benchmark Study 2015, n. March, p. 1–75, 2016.
DAUDT, G. M.; WILLCOX, L. D. Reflexões críticas a partir das experiências dos Estados Unidos e da Alemanha em manufatura avançada. BNDES Setorial, n. 44, p. 5–45, 2016.
HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. “Industry 4.0" as Promising technology: Emergence, semantics and ambivalent character. Digitization of manufacturing and industrial work/ “Industry 4.0”., n. October, 2016.
IEDI. Estratégias Nacionais Para a industria 4.0. [s.l: s.n.]. Disponível em: http://www.iedi.org.br/artigos/top/estudos_industria/20180705_estrategias_nacionais_para_a_industria_4_0.html.
JABBOUR, Elias Marco Khalil; DANTAS, Alexis. Estado, mercado, setor privado e planificação no desenvolvimento econômico recente da China. Geosul, Florianópolis, v. 33, n. 68, p. 12-35, set. 2018.
JAMES MANYIKA et al. Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation. McKinsey Global Institute, n. November, p. 184, 2012.
JASPERNEITE, J. Industrie 4.0: Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? [s.l: s.n.]. v. 12
LI, L. China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n. May, p. 0–1, 2017.
LI, Y. Direction of Chinese Global Investments: Implications for Brazil. p. 357, 2017.
LIAO, Y. et al. The impact of the fourth industrial revolution: a cross-country/region comparison. Production, v. 28, n. 0, 2018.
LIST, Friedrich. Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie (The national system of political economy). Stuttgart, W Germany: JG Cotta, 1841.
LIU, F. et al. China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy, v. 40, n. 7, p. 917–931, 1 set. 2011.
LIU, F. C. et al. China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy, 2011.
MAJEROWICZ, E.; MEDEIROS, C. A. DE. Chinese Industrial Policy in the Geopolitics of the Information Age: the Case of Semiconductors. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–28, 2018.
MÓDOLO, D. B.; HIRATUKA, C. The impact of Chinese competition on third markets: An analysis by region and technological category. Development Policy Review, v. 35, n. 6, p. 797–821, 2017.
NEW ROBOT. Japan’s Robot Strategy - Vision, Strategy, Action Plan // The Headquarters for Japan’s Economic Revitalization. 2015. 90 r. –http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2015/pdf/0123_01b.pdf
ROBLEK, V.; MEŠKO, M.; KRAPEŽ, A. A Complex View of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open, v. 6, n. 2, 2016.
SCHWAB, K. N. D. Aplicando a Quarta Revolução Industrial. [s.l: s.n.].
SHROUF, F.; ORDIERES, J.; MIRAGLIOTTA, G. Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, v. 2015–Janua, p. 697–701, 2014.
VARGHESE, A.; TANDUR, D. Wireless requirements and challenges in Industry 4.0Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics, IC3I 2014. Anais...2014.
WANG, S. et al. Towards smart factory for Industry 4.0: A self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, v. 101, p. 158–168, 2015.
XU, L. DA; XU, E. L.; LI, L. Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, v. 7543, p. 1–22, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
