Industry 4.0 and global networks in technology intensive services: a critical approach and notes for industrial policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2023.e89975

Keywords:

Technical-Economic Paradigm, Industry 4.0, Global Productive Networks, Industrial and Technology Policy

Abstract

This paper analyzes the emergence of Industry 4.0 from a critical approach that, despite recognizing the important changes underway, rejects the understanding of this phenomenon as the advent of the 4th. Industrial Revolution. The analysis proposes guidelines for the design of national industrial and technological policies based on the understanding that the core technologies of this new technical-economic paradigm are developed within the scope of different configurations of globalized networks. A typology for these global networks is then proposed with ramifications on the different approaches to policy strategies.

 

Author Biographies

Antonio Carlos Diegues, Instituto de Economia / Unicamp

Bacharel, Mestre e Doutor pelo Instituto de Economia / Universidade Estadual de Campinas (IE-Unicamp). Professor Associado do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (IE-Unicamp)

José Eduardo Roselino, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (DGTH-UFSCar)

Bacharel em Economia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Mestre e Doutor em Economia pelo Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (IE-Unicamp). Professor Associado do Departamento de Geografia, Turismo e Humanidades da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (DGTH-UFSCar)

References

ANDERSON, C. (2006). A Cauda Longa - Do Mercado de Massa para o Mercado de Nicho, Editora Campus.

ATHREYE, S., The Indian Software Industry, in Arora, Ashish., & Gambardella, Alfonso (org), From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China, India Ireland, and Israel, Oxford University Press, 2005.

BIELSCHOWSKY, R. (2014). Estratégia de desenvolvimento e as três frentes de expansão no Brasil: um desenho conceitual, In: Calixtre, A.; Biancarelli, A.; Cintra, M. A.. (Org.). Presente e Futuro do Desenvolvimento Brasileiro. 1ed. Brasília: Ipea (pp. 195-225).

BRESNAHAN, T. & GREESTEIN, S. Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry. The Jounal of Indústrial Economics, Volume XLVII, March, 1999.

BROEDNER, P. Industrie 4.0 und Big Data–wirklich ein neuer Technologieschub?. In: Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2015. p. 232-251.COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, v. 99, n. 397, p. 569-596, set. 1989.

COUTINHO, L.; A Terceira revolução industrial e tecnológica, Revista Economia e Sociedade número 1, Instituto de Economia - Unicamp, 1992.

COUTINHO, L.; KUPFER, D. (2015). As Múltiplas Oportunidades de desenvolvimento e o Futuro da Indústria Brasileira, in ADBI, Dez anos de política industrial balanço & perspectivas – 2004-2014.

CHANDLER, A. Scale and Scope. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (1990).

CHESNAIS, F. A Mundialização do Capital, Xamã Editora, São Paulo, 1996.

CUSUMANO, M. A. & GAWER, A. Driving High-Tech Innovation: The Four Levers of Platform Leadership. Paper 152, Center for e-Business@MIT, October, 2001.

ERNST, D. The Economics of Electronics Industry: Competitive Dynamics and Industrial Organization, East-West Center Working Papers, Economics Series No. 7, October, 2000.

ERNST, D. & KIM, L. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, n. 31, p. 1417-1429, 2002.

GAWER, A. & CUSUMANO, M. A.. Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, 2002.

GAWER, A. & CUSUMANO, M. A.. & HENDERSON, R. Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel, NBER Working Paper 11852, Cambridge, December, 2005.

HIRATUKA, et. al. (2008) Importância Socioeconômica da Cadeia de Serviços de Saneamento Básico no Brasil, Encontro da Anpec.

HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. Industry 4.0 as promising technology: emergence, semantics and ambivalent character. digitization of manufacturing and industrialwork. Soziologisches Arbeitspapier Nr. 48, 2016.

LAZONICK, W & SULLILIVAN, M.O. Maximizining shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, vol.29 n.1, pp. 13-35, 2000.

ROSELINO, J.E.S. (2006). A INDÚSTRIA DE SOFTWARE: O ‘modelo brasileiro’ em perspectiva comparada. Tese de Doutoramento. Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas: Campinas.

ROSELINO, J. E.; GARCIA, R. (2002). The Informatics Law and its Effcts on the Brazilian Electronic Complex Industry ? A Critical Evaluation. In: 6th Annual EUNIP (European Network on Industril Policy) Conference.

SANTOS, Felipe Lucena Andrade, China e a Indústria 4.0, uma análise comparativa. Dissertação de mestrado, Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Economia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – UFSCar, 2019.

SARTI, Fernando; HIRATUKA, Célio. (2017) Desempenho recente da indústria brasileira no contexto de mudanças estruturais domésticas e globais. Campinas: Unicamp. IE. TD290.

STURGEON, T. J. T, “Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization”. Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 3, pp. 451-496, 2002.

SUZIGAN, W.; FURTADO, J. (2006). Política Industrial e Desenvolvimento. Revista de Economia Política, vol. 26, nº 2 (102), pp. 163-185 abril-junho.

ZYSMAN, J., MURRAY, J., FELDMAN, S., NIELSEN, N. C., & KUSHIDA, K. E. Services with everything: The ICT-enabled digital transformation of services, BRIE Working Paper 187a, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-15

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 86 (2023): Geopolítica: mundo, nações e regiões

Section

Artigos

License

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.