The role of research and development (R&D) in the energy transition: a comparative analysis for OECD countries

Authors

Keywords:

Investment in R&D, Energy transition , Multivariate analysis

Abstract

This article aimed to investigate the main conditions that encouraged the adoption of renewable energies (RE) in the 42 (forty-two) member and associated countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), based on the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) for the years 2000, 2010 and 2019. The main result of this work verified the relevance of investments in Research and Development (R&D) for the energy transition of nations. Furthermore, an association was observed between R&D and other conditions (e.g., carbon dioxide emissions, per capita income, and environmental innovation), which boosted the expansion of RE, in the respective years. It is worth noting that countries such as Denmark and New Zealand have achieved promising results, attributed to the decarbonization targets established in climate cooperation agreements. It was concluded that the adoption of some instruments was essential for the promotion of competitiveness and the development of renewable technologies.

Author Biographies

Lindomayara Ferreira, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-graduação em Economia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (PPGE/UFJF), Mestra em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS), Pós-graduada em Gestão de Finanças (UNIFAVIP Wyden), Graduada em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE/CAA) e Profissional certificada CPA-20 (ANBIMA). Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas de pesquisa: Inovação, Meio ambiente e Desenvolvimento Regional, com ênfase em Energia Renovável.

Jamaika Prado, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-graduação em Economia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (PPGE/UFJF), Mestrado em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL), Bacharel em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Bacharel em Matemática pela Universidade de Uberaba (UNIUBE). Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas de pesquisa: Economia do meio ambiente e dos recursos naturais, desenvolvimento regional e demografia econômica.

Rosa Livia Gonçalves Montenegro , Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Professora Adjunta no Departamento de Economia e professora permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia  da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (PPGE/UFJF), Doutora em Economia Regional pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) e Mestre em Economia Aplicada pela UFJF, Bacharel em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas que envolvem economia aplicada:  Desenvolvimento Econômico e Regional, Inovação Ambiental, Sistemas de Inovação, Economia Industrial e Economia da Ciência e Tecnologia.

References

ANEEL. Aneel autoriza operação de duas termelétricas para abastecer o Amapá. Disponível em: <https://www.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/energia-minerais-e-combustiveis/2020/11/aneel-autoriza-operacao-de-duas-termeletricas-para-abastecer-o-amapa> visualização 16/02/23.

BRUNDTLAND, Gro Harlem. Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento: Nosso Futuro Comum. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FGV, 1991.

CHN – CLIMATE HOME NEWS. Which countries have a net zero carbon goal? Disponível em: <https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/14/countries-net-zero-climate-goal/> 17/10/22.

DELEIDI, Matteo; et al. Neither crowding in nor out: Public direct investment mobilizing private investment into renewable electricity projects. Energy Policy, v. 140, p. 111195, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111195.

FAICT, Sophie. Drivers of Renewable Energy Innovation: Why do some member states perform better than others? Desertion: Master of Science in EU-Studies, 2021.

GANTER, Alois, HECKER, Achim. Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies. Journal of Business Research, v. 67, n.6, p. 1285-1292, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.004.

GEELS, Frank. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspectives. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 31, n. 5, p. 21–40, 2014.

GIBBS, David; O’NEILL, Kirstie. Future green economies and regional development: a research agenda. Regional Studies, 2016.

GUIMARÃES, Leonam. A Geopolítica da Energia de Baixo Carbono. Caderno Opinião: FGV Energia, 2016.

GUTIERREZ, Maria. A função do estado no setor de energia nos países da OCDE: equilibrando a segurança energética, a eficiência e a sustentabilidade. Texto para discussão, n. 2667. Brasília: Ipea , 2021.

HAYAT, Sikandar; et al. Renewable energy R&D and natural resources: A success story of environmentally friendly financing in OECD economies. Resources Policy, v. 83, n. 103655, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103655

HESS, David; MAI, Quan. Renewable electricity policy in Asia: A qualitative comparative analysis of factors affecting sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.001.

HUH, Taewook; et al. Drivers and Ideal Types towards Energy Transition: Anticipating the Futures Scenarios of OECD Countries. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, n. 16, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16081441.

IRENA. Renewable Energy Employment by Country. Disponível em: <https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Benefits/Renewable-Energy-Employment-by-Country> 17/10/22.

IRENA. Policy analysis. Disponível em: <https://www.irena.org/Energy-Transition/Policy> 24/02/23.

JANNUZZI, Gilberto. Energia e Mudanças Climáticas: barreiras e oportunidades para o Brasil. Revista com ciência, 2005.

LEMA, Rasmus; et al. Green windows of opportunity: latecomer development in the age of transformation toward sustainability. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1193-1209, 2020.

LOORBACH, Derk. Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, p. 599–626, 2017.

LU, Yujie; et al. Pathways to Sustainable Deployment of Solar Photovoltaic Policies in 20 Leading Countries Using a Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 5858, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105858

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. O Estado Empreendedor: Desmascarando o Mito do Setor Público vs. Setor Privado. São Paulo: Portfolio Perguin, 2013.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change, Sussex Language Institute, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt025.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana., SEMIENIUKB, Gregor. Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 127, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.

MINGOTI, Sueli. Análise de dados através de métodos estatística multivariada: uma abordagem aplicada. Editora: Didática, 2007.

MONTENEGRO, Rosa; et al. Análise macrocomparativa da inovação ambiental (1990, 2000 e 2010). Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 17, n. 2, p. 317–344, 2018. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v17i2.8651298. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8651298. Acesso em: 04 fev. 2023.

NEWELL, Peter. Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions. Review of International Political Economy, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1511448

POPP, David; et al. Energy, teh environment, and technological chance. Handbook in Economics, v. 02, 2010.

QADIR, Sikandar; et al. Incentives and strategies for financing the renewable energy transition: A review. Energy Reports, v. 7, p. 3590-3606, 2021.

RAGIN, Charles; DAVEY, Sean. fs/QCA, version 2.5 (computer program). Tucson: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, 2009.

REN21. Renewables 2022. Paris: REN21 Secretariat, 2022a.

REN21. Renewable energy data in perspective. Paris: REN21 Secretariat, 2022b.

SEDLACEK, Sabine; et al. Collaborative governance in energy regions e Experiences from an Austrian region. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 256, 2020.

SUN, Inkyoung; KIM, So. Energy R&D towards Sustainability: A Panel Analysis of Government Budget for Energy R&D in OECD Countries (1974–2012). Sustainability, v. 9, n. 4, 617, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040617

SCHNEIDER, Carsten; WAGEMANN, Claudius. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244.

UMAR, Muhammad; SAFI, Adnan. Do green finance and innovation matter for environmental protection? A case of OECD economies. Energy Economics, v. 119, n. 106560, 2023.

WAGEMANN, Claudius. ¿Quéhay de nuevoenel Método Comparado? QCA y El análisis de los conjuntos difusos. Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, v. 1, n. 1, p. 51-75, 2012.

WEF - WORDL ECONOMIC FORUM. Disponível em: <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/how-cheap-can-renewable-energy-get/> 17/10/22.

WURSTER, Stefan; HAGEMANN, Christian. Two ways to success expansion of renewable energies in comparison between Germany's federal states. Energy Policy, 119, p. 610–619, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.059.

WURSTER, Stefan; HAGEMANN, Christian. Expansion of Renewable Energy in Federal Settings: Austria, Belgium, and Germany in Comparison. Journal of Environment & Development, v. 29, n. 1, p. 147–168, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519887488.

Published

2024-10-21

Issue

Section

Artigos