El potencial científico de las redes sociales para llenar lagunas biogeográficas de conocimiento de la biodiversidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2022.e84123Palabras clave:
Conservación, Etnoecología, Datos científicos, Redes sociales, InstagramResumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar cómo la información disponible en bases de datos científicas combinada con datos de redes sociales puede ser prometedora para llenar los vacíos geográficos existentes en la biodiversidad, ya que existe una falta de información sobre la distribución real de especies para el estudio de la conservación. Los nombres científicos de cinco conocidas especies neotropicales fueron consultados como palabras clave en bases de datos científicas y redes sociales. La distribución de K. rupestris [DC = 547; RS = 21], P. bicolor [DC = 326; RS = 40] y T. teguixina [DC = 580; RS = 78] tuvo un aumento severo en los datos de las redes sociales, mientras que B. variegatus [DC = 1186; RS = 100] y C. caudata [DC = 1470; RS = 34], aunque muestran nuevos datos geográficos, no cubren grandes áreas nuevas. Abandonar los datos de las redes sociales puede resultar en la pérdida de información relevante para la conservación de lós animales de lo Brasil.
Citas
AHUMADA, J. A., et al. Monitoring the Status and Trends of Tropical Forest Terrestrial Vertebrate Communities from Camera Trap Data: A Tool for Conservation. PLoS ONE, [s. l.], v. 8, ed. 9, p. 6-9, 2013. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073707. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/76aaa037-28a4-3248-a8f5-75ea3bdd7a6f/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B102f47f8-89c2-4617-8b28-8e6b46fb9d0a%7D. Acesso em: 24 set. 2021.
ARDOIN, N. M.; BOWERS, A. W.; GAILLARD, E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, Australia, v. 241, p. 2-13, 2020. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320719307116?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021
BLICHARSKA, M.; ORLIKOWSKA, E. H.; ROBERGE, J.M.; GRODZINSKA-JURCZAK, M. Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the Natura 2000 network. Biological Conservation, Kraków, Poland, v. 199, p. 110-122, 2016. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007. Disponível em: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/biological-conservation. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
BUTCHART, S. H. M. et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, [s. l.], v. 328, ed. 5982, p. 1164-1168, 2012. DOI 10.1126/science.1187512. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ccd0f31e-f58a-38b3-8a3a-ac0e1d812c63/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B27c9d009-a54f-4846-a901-d39a874eeb3b%7D. Acesso em: 24 set. 2021.
DIRZO, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, [s. l.], v. 345, ed. 6165, p. 401-406, 2014. DOI 10.1126/science.1251817. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3f289e06-362a-3c1a-93ce-34c6d89b0b0c/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B587ab197-56c9-4fc6-809d-2409ec331b62%7D. Acesso em: 24 set. 2021.
DRURY, J. P.; BARNES, M.; FINNERAN, A. E.; HARRIS, M.; GRETHER, G. F. Continent-scale phenotype mapping using citizen scientists’ photographs. Ecography, Los Angeles, USA.,v. 42, p. 1-10, 2019. DOI 10.1111/ecog.04469. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.04469. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
ESRI. 2010 ArcGIS Desktop release: 10.1.
FREITAS, T. M. S.; MONTAG, L. F. A.; DE MARCO, P.; HORTAL, J. How reliable are species identifications in biodiversity big data? Evaluating the records of a neotropical fish family in online repositories. Systematics and Biodiversity, [s. l.], p. 1-11, 2020. DOI 10.1080/14772000.2020.1730473. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14772000.2020.1730473. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
MITTERMEIER, J. C.; ROLL, U.; MATTHEWS, T. J.; GRENYER, R. A season for all things: Phenological imprintsin Wikipedia usage and their relevance toconservation. PLOS Biology, [s. l.], p. 1-13, 2019. DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000146. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331533210_A_season_for_all_things_Phenological_imprints_in_Wikipedia_usage_and_their_relevance_to_conservation. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
MARSHALL, B. M. et al. An inventory of online reptile images. ZOOTAXA, [s. l.], v. 4896, ed. 2, p. 251-264, 2020. DOI 10.11646/ZOOTAXA.4896.2.6. Disponível em: https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.4896.2.6. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
MOREIRA, D.; MENDES, S. L. O status do conhecimento sobre a fauna de mamíferos do Espírito Santo baseado em registros de museus e literatura científica Article. Biota Neotropica, [s. l.], v. 8, ed. 2, p. 163-173, 2008. DOI 10.1590/S1676-06032008000200017. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228822965_O_status_do_conhecimento_sobre_a_fauna_de_mamiferos_do_Espirito_Santo_baseado_em_registros_de_museus_e_literatura_cientifica. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
MUTKE, J.; WEIGEND, M. Mesoscale patterns of plant diversity in Andean South America based on combined checklist and GBIF data. Berichte der Reinhold-Tüxen-Gesellschaft, Hannover, v. 29, p. 83-97, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321051459_Mesoscale_patterns_of_plant_diversity_in_Andean_South_America_based_on_combined_checklist_and_GBIF_data. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
PIMM, S. L.; RAVEN, P. H. The state of the world’s biodiversity. In: RAVEN, P.; MCIVOR, A. L. Biological Extinction: New Perspectives. [S. l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2019. p. 80-112. ISBN 9781108482288. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3a2174fc-809e-30e1-adb8-00549b4819d2/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B1db7b68d-77a9-4112-994f-d92c2bafee41%7D. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
VAZ, A. et al. Earth observation and social media: Evaluating the spatiotemporal contribution of non-native trees to cultural ecosystem services. Remote Sensing of Environment, [s. l.], v. 230, p. 111-193, 2019. DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.012. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fca03555-51e8-383a-aea8-e49cb03be2a5/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7Bc1277222-5d1a-452d-90b5-042591d12051%7D. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021
VOHLAND, K. et al. The Science of Citizen Science. 1. ed. [S. l.]: Springer, 2017. 520 p. ISBN 978-3-030-58277-7. DOI 10.1145/3022198.3022652. Disponível em: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fc1f04d3-e67e-3da5-9ce0-3688efbfbd4f/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7Bc9bc79ad-8199-46a9-ad81-bb4b72c764f1%7D. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
SCHUTTLER, S. et al. Citizen Science in Schools: Students Collect Valuable Mammal Data for Science, Conservation, and Community Engagement. BioScience, [s. l.], v. 69, ed. 1, p. 69-79, 2019. DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy141. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329659274_Citizen_Science_in_Schools_Students_Collect_Valuable_Mammal_Data_for_Science_Conservation_and_Community_Engagement. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.
TURNER, W. R. et al. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience, [s. l.], v. 54, ed. 6, p. 585-590, 2004. DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0585:GUATSO]2.0.CO;2. Disponível em: http://www.mendeley.com/research/b2453942-9943-3dce-b0b9-d55163d0e5c8/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B659f83e8-515e-4e88-8d18-338cf8ffb94e%7D. Acesso em: 24 set. 2021.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
![Licença Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.