15 years on: Sam Harris’s Moral Landscape, a Retrospective Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2025.e103162Palavras-chave:
Sam Harris, Henry Sidgwick, Peter Singer, moral landscape, hedonistic utilitarianismResumo
In his best-selling book The Moral Landscape, Sam Harris develops a model for a universal ethics. His version of consequentialism has had some impact on the public, specifically on so-called new atheists. On the book’s 15th anniversary, I look back at and retrospectively critique Harris’s “science of morality” to see if it has stood the test of time. I first summarise the view, then identify various problems with it. Thereafter, I turn to arguably the most famous utilitarian, Peter Singer, for potential solutions to these problems. Since the publication of Harris’s book, Singer and Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek have written The Point of View of the Universe. This book looks to Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics for answers to many of utilitarianism’s perennial challenges, some of which Harris does not ostensibly overcome. My aim is to investigate whether Singer and de LazariRadek’s utilitarianism (as informed by Sidgwick) can succeed where Harris’s version seemingly does not.
Referências
APPIAH, Kwame. Science knows best. New York Times, Oct. 1, 2010. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/books/review/Appiaht.html. Accessed on: Apr. 4, 2024.
BĚLOHRAD, Radim. The is-ought problem, the open question argument, and the new science of morality. Human Affairs, v. 21, n. 3, p. 262–271, 2011.
BENATAR, David. Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
BLACKBURN, Simon. Morality without God. Prospect Magazine, 23 Mar. 2011. Available at: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/blackburn-ethics-withoutgod-secularism-religion-sam-harris. Accessed on: 24 Apr. 2024.
BLACKFORD, Russell. Review of the moral landscape, by Sam Harris. Journal of Evolution and Technology, v. 21 n. 2, p. 53–62, 2010.
BOORNAZIAN, Erik; DILLER, James. A moral compass that works. In: WOIEN, Sandra (Ed.). Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 9.
BROWN, Campbell. Minding the is-ought gap. Journal of Philosophical Logic, v. 43, n. 1, p. 53–69, 2014.
CHAMPAGNE, Marc. My life gives the moral landscape its relief. In: WOIEN, Sandra (Ed.). Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 2.
DANIELS, Norman. Justice and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
DAWKINS, Richard. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
DAWKINS, Richard; HARRIS, Sam. Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins discuss: who says science has nothing to say about morality? Richard Dawkins Foundation, 4 May 2011. Available at: https://www.richarddawkins.net/2011/05/who-says-science-has-nothingto-say-about-morality-2/. Accessed on: 20 Aug. 2024.
DE BRIGARD, Felipe. If you like it, does it matter if it’s real? Philosophical Psychology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 43–57, 2010.
DE LAZARI-RADEK, Katarzyna. On the notion of well-being. Analiza i Egzystencja v. 43, n. 1, p. 5–22, 2018.
DE LAZARI-RADEK, Katarzyna. What should a consequentialist promote? In: PORTMORE, Douglas W. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. p. 197-217.
DE LAZARI-RADEK, Katarzyna; SINGER, Peter. The objectivity of ethics and the unity of practical reason. Ethics v. 123, n.1, p. 9–31, 2012.
DE LAZARI-RADEK, Katarzyna; SINGER, Peter. The point of view of the universe: Sidgwick and contemporary ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
DE LAZARI-RADEK, Katarzyna; SINGER, Peter. Utilitarianism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
DENNETT, Daniel. Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995.
DILLER, James; NUZZOLILLI, Andrew. The science of values: the moral landscape by Sam Harris. Behavior Analyst v. 35, n. 2, p. 265–273, 2012.
DUNLOP, William. Review of the moral landscape: how science can determine human values. Bioethical Inquiry v. 11, n. 4, p. 557–561, 2014.
DUNN, Elizabeth W.; AKNIN, Lara B.; NORTON, Michael I. Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science v. 319, n. 5870, p. 1687–88, 2008.
GERT, Bernard. Neuroscience and morality. Hastings Center Report v. 42, n. 3, p. 22–28, 2012.
GORDON, David. Dark spots in Sam Harris’s moral landscape. In: WOIEN, Sandra (Ed.). Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 8.
HARE, Richard M. Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.
HARRIS, Sam. The end of faith: religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York: W.W. Norton and Co, 2005.
HARRIS, Sam. We are making moral progress. Edge, 2007. Available at: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/10416. Accessed on: 31 Mar. 2024.
HARRIS, Sam; SHETH, Sameer A.; COHEN, Mark S. Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty. Annals of Neurology v. 63, n. 2, p. 141–147, 2008.
HARRIS, Sam. The moral landscape: how science can determine human values. London: Bantam Press, 2010.
HARRIS, Sam. Toward a science of morality. HuffPost, 6 July 2011. Available at: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-science-ofmorality_b_567185. Accessed on: 3 Mar. 2024.
HARRIS, Sam. Response to critics. HuffPost, 29 Jan. 2011. Available at: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-response-to-critics_b_815742. Accessed on: 31 Mar. 2024.
HARRIS, Sam. Waking up: a guide to spirituality without religion. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2014.
HARRIS, Sam. What do you think about machines that think? Can we avoid a digital apocalypse? Edge, 2015. Available at: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26177. Accessed on: 8 Aug. 2024.
HARRIS, Sam. What is moral progress? A conversation with Peter Singer. Sam Harris, 21 Oct. 2016. Podcast, MP3 audio. Available at: https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/what-is-moral-progress. Accessed on: 3 Apr. 2024.
HARRIS, Sam. Making sense: conversations on consciousness, morality, and the future of humanity. New York: Ecco, 2020.
HELLIWELL, John F.; LAYARD, Richard; SACHS, Jeffrey D.; DE NEVE, Jan E. World happiness report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2020.
HOOKER, Brad. The demandingness objection. In: CHAPPELL, Timothy (Ed.). The problem of moral demandingness. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 148-162.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Objective happiness. In: KAHNEMAN, Daniel; DIENER, Ed; SCHWARZ, Norbert (Eds.). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999. p. 3-25.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
KAGAN, Shelly. How to count animals, more or less. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
LENMAN, James. Consequentialism and cluelessness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, v. 29, n. 4, p. 342–370, 2000.
MEACHAM, Bill. Review of the moral landscape: how science can determine human values. Philosophy Now, v. 90, n. 1, p. 42–44, 2012.
NAGEL, Thomas. The facts fetish. The New Republic, 20. Oct. 2010. Available at: http://www.tnr.com/article/books-andarts/magazine/78546/the-facts-fetish-morality-science. Accessed on: 30 Mar. 2024.
NOZICK, Robert. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
PARFIT, Derek. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
PARFIT, Derek. On what matters: volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
PERCIVAL, Ray S. The mantle of neuroscience. In: WOIEN, Sandra. (Ed.) Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 6.
PHILLIPS, David. Sidgwickian ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
RAWLS, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
RAWLS, John. Kantian constructivism in moral theory: the Dewey lectures. Journal of Philosophy, v. 77, n. 9, p. 515–572, 1980.
RAWLS, John. Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, v. 14, n. 3, p. 223–251, 1985.
RILLING, James K.; GUTMAN, David A.; ZEH, Thorsten; PAGNONI, Giuseppe; BERNS, Gregory S.; KILTS, Clinton D. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, v. 35, n. 2, p. 395–405, 2002.
SIDGWICK, Henry. Methods of ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1874/1962.
SIDGWICK, Henry. The establishment of ethical first principles. Mind, v. 4, n. 13, p. 106–111, 1879.
SINGER, Peter. The triviality of the debate over ‘is-ought’ and the definition of ‘moral’. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 10, n. 1, p. 51–56, 1973.
SINGER, Peter. Sidgwick and reflective equilibrium. The Monist, v. 58, n. 3, p. 490–517, 1974.
SINGER, Peter. Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: New York Review, 1975.
SINGER, Peter. Ethics and intuitions. Journal of Ethics, v. 9, n. 3, p. 331–352, 2005.
SINGER, Peter. Practical ethics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
SINGER, Peter. The most good you can do: how effective altruism is changing ideas about living ethically. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.
SINGER, Peter. Ethics in the real world. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023.
STREET, Sharon. A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, v. 127, n. 1, p. 109–166, 2006.
TÄNNSJÖ, Torbjörn. Hedonistic utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
VAN DER MERWE, R. Rational decision-making in a complex world: towards an instrumental, yet embodied, account. Logos and Episteme, v. 13, n. 4, p. 381–404, 2022.
VAN DER MERWE, R. How pluralistic is pluralism really? A case study of Sandra Mitchell’s integrative pluralism. Theoria, v. 38, n. 3, p. 319–338, 2023.
VAN DER MERWE, R. Stance pluralism, scientology and the problem of relativism. Foundations of Science, v. 29, n. 3, p. 625–644, 2024.
VAN DER MERWE, R. How Darwin can help post-structuralists maintain that apartheid was unconditionally unjust. The Journal of Ethics, v. 29, n. 2, p. 337–357, 2025.
VAN DER MERWE, R. Perspectives and meta-perspectives: context versus hierarchy in the epistemology of complex systems. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, v. 15, n. 14, p. 1–20, 2025.
VAN DER MERWE, R.; BROADBENT, A. A beginner’s guide to crossing the road: towards an epistemology of successful action in complex systems. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, v. 49, n. 5, p. 460–475, 2024.
VLERICK, Michael; BROADBENT, Alex. Evolution and epistemic justification. Dialectica, v. 69, n. 22, p. 185–203, 2015.
WARREN, Mark. A miserable argument. In: WOIEN, Sandra (Ed.). Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 7.
WEIJERS, Dan. Nozick’s experience machine is dead, long live the experience machine! Philosophical Psychology, v. 27, n. 4, p. 513–535, 2013.
WILLIAMS, Bernard. A critique of utilitarianism. In: SMART, James J. C.; WILLIAMS, Bernard (Eds.). Utilitarianism for and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. p. 97-98.
WOIEN, Sandra. Another red pill. In: WOIEN, Sandra (Ed.). Sam Harris: critical responses. Chicago: Carus Books, 2023. Kindle Edition. Chapter 1.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
This obra is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional
