Virtue-based Approaches to Professional Ethics: a Plea for More Rigorous Use of Empirical Science
Palavras-chave:Empirical Ethics, Professional Ethics, Professional Virtues, Science-based Ethics, Teleological Virtue Theory, Virtue Ethics
Until recently, the method of professional ethics has been largely principle-based. But the failure of this approach to take into sufficient account the character of professionals has led to a revival of virtue ethics. The kind of professional virtue ethics that I am concerned with in this paper is teleological in that it relates the virtues of a profession to the ends of this profession. My aim is to show how empirical research can (in addition to philosophical inquiry) be used to develop virtue-based accounts of professional ethics, and that such empirically well-informed approaches are more convincing than traditional kinds of professional virtue ethics. The paper is divided into four sections. In the first, I outline the structure of a teleological approach to virtue ethics. In Section 2, I show that empirical research can play an essential role in professional ethics by emphasizing the difference between conceptual and empirical matters. Section 3 demonstrates the relevance of virtues in professional life; and the last section is concerned with some meta-ethical issues that are raised by a teleological account of professional virtues.
Airaksinen, T. (2012). Professional ethics. In R. Chadwick (ed.). Encyclopedia of applied ethics, vol. 3, (pp. 612-623). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Annas, J. (2015). Virtue, skill and vice. Ethics & Politics, XVII, 94-106.
Banks, S. and Gallagher, A. (2009). Ethics in professional life: Virtues for health and social care. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Braunack-Mayer, A. (2005). What makes a good GP? An empirical perspective on virtue in general practice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 82–87.
Catlett, S. and Lovan, S. R. (2011). Being a good nurse and doing the right thing: A replication study. Nursing Ethics, 18, 54–63.
Chen, S. Y. and Hsu, H. C. (2015). Nurses’ reflections on good nurse traits: Implications for improving care quality. Nursing Ethics, 22, 790–802.
DeRosa, G. R. (2006). Professionalism and virtues. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 449, 28-33.
Doukas, D. J. (2003). Where is the virtue in professionalism? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 12, 147–154.
Driver, J. (2001). Uneasy virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, C. E. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 153-164.
Hedgecoe, A. M. (2004). Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics, 18, 120-143.
Hursthouse, R. (1991). Virtue theory and abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20, 223-246.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurtz, G. M. and Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
Jansen, L. A. (2000). The virtues in their place: Virtue ethics in medicine. Theoretical Medicine 21, 261–276.
Jordan, A. E. and Meara, N. M. (1990). Ethics and the professional practice of psychologists: The role of virtues and principles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 107-114.
Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P. L., Murtha, T., and Goff, M. (1995). Personality and intelligence in industrial and organizational psychology. In D. H. Saklofske and M. Zeidner (eds.). International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum.
Korsgaard, C. M. (1983). Two distinctions in goodness. The Philosophical Review, 92, 169-97.
Louden, R. B. (1984). On some vices of virtue ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21, 227-236.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.
Matthews, G. and Deary, I. J. (1998). Personality traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyers, C. (2013). Professional ethics. In H. LaFollette (ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics, vol. 7, (pp. 4121-4234). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Miller, C. B. (2014). Character and moral psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oakley, J. and Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., and Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
Pellegrino, E. D. (1995). Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5, 253-277.
Pellegrino, E. (2002). Professionalism, profession and the virtues of the good physician. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 69, 378-384.
Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C. (1993). The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
. (1996). The Christian virtues in medical practice. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Sellman, D. (1997). The virtues in the moral education of nurses: Florence Nightingale revisited. Nursing Ethics, 4, 3-11.
Smith, K. V. and Godfrey, N. S. (2002). Being a good nurse and doing the right thing: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics, 9, 301-312.
Sockett, H. (2009). Dispositions as virtues: The complexity of the construct. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 291-303.
Stovall, P. (2011). Professional virtue and professional self-awareness: A case study in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 109-132.
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swanton, C. (2013). The definition of virtue ethics. In D. C. Russell (ed.). The Cambridge companion to virtue ethics (pp. 315-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szűcs, É. U. (2009). The role of teachers in the 21st century. Revue Internationale, 10, 1-8.
Van Zyl, L. (2013). Virtue ethics and right action. In D. C. Russell (ed.). The Cambridge companion to virtue ethics (pp. 172-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Von Wright, G. H. (1963). The varieties of goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
This obra is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional