Environmental Ethics and Responsibility

Luiz Paulo Rouanet

Resumo


This paper resumes a previous discussion on Environmental Ethics and Irreversibility, which was presented in 2005. There I first faced the problem. Now I would like to reevaluate the issue. Was my paper “catastrophist”? Or was it, instead, realistic? Which are today the main issues confronting Environmental Ethics? Plainly speaking, what can we really do? These are some of the questions I would like to bring in to the debate with my colleagues and the public. In other words, instead of focusing in the aspect of “irreversibility”, I prefer here to focus on the “responsibility” of agents and institutions. It rescues the so-called “Principle of Responsibility”, by Hans Jonas. There is also some debate with Karl-Otto Appel and Habermas. If, on one hand, there are irreversible damages to nature, as the extinction of species and even of natural locations, as rivers and other natural accidents, there are, on the other hand, many actions that can and must be taken in order to preserve or deter the grave consequences of the environmental degradation. In this paper, I try to discuss some of the problems and propose some solutions, but the more important thing is to call everyone – individuals, groups, or institutions – to responsibility face the Earth, the Human and not-human beings, and mainly the future generations.


Palavras-chave


Environmental Ethics; Global Ethics; Responsibility; Irreversibility

Texto completo:

PDF/A (English)

Referências


APEL, Karl-Otto. (1990). Diskurs und Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

APEL, Karl-Otto. (2007). Ética e responsabilidade. Trad. Jorge Telles Menezes. Lisboa : Instituto Piaget, 2007.

BOURG, Dominique. Hans Jonas et l´écologie. La Recherche, Paris: s.n, v.24, n.256, p. 886-890, jul./ago.1993.

CAPRA, F. (1983). O Tao da Física. 10ª. ed. Trans. José Fernandes Dias. São Paulo: Cultrix.

EPLER, E. Wege aus der Gefahr, Reunbeck, 1981.

GREENPEACE (2013), Point of no return – The massive climate threats we must avoid. bit.ly/XuAG7m, in http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil.

HABERMAS, J. (2007). Ética da discussão e a questão da verdade. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

HABERMAS, J. (2004). O futuro da natureza humana. São Paulo.

HABERMAS, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Polity Press.

HÖNISCH, Bärbel, RIDGWELL, Andy et al. (2012). The geological record of ocean acidification. Science, vol. 335, 2 March 2012. www.sciencemag.org., pp. 1058-1063.

JONAS, Hans. (2006). O princípio responsabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.

KANT, I. (1977 [1785]. “Grundlegung zur Metaphysyk der Sitten”, in Werkausgabe, XII Banden. Bd. VII, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

MACINTYRE, A. (2007). After Virtue – A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd. ed. Notre Dame Press.

MEADOWS, D.; RANDERS, J. & MEADOWS, D. (2012). Los límites del crecimiento [Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update). Transl. Sergio Pawlowski. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.

NOZICK, Robert. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

PASCAL, Georges. Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Du Seuil, 1963.

RAU, Greg H. ; McLEOD, Elizabeth L. ; HOEGH-GULDBERG, Ove. (2012). The need for new ocean conservation strategies in a high-carbon dioxide world. Nature Climate Change. MacMillan, www.nature.com/natureclimatechange, pp. 1-5.

SINGER, Peter [1975] (2009). Animal Liberation. Revised edition. New York: Harper Collins.

RAWLS, John. (1999). Law of people. New York: Harvard University Press.

http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/aboutcc/problems/rising_temperatures/hotspot_map/brazil.cfm , access in April 17, 2013.

http://desmatamentozero.org.br/, access in April 24, 2013.

http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil, access in April 24, 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2015v14n3p382

 

 

 

 

 

ethic@. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil, eISSN 1677-2954

Licença Creative Commons
This obra is licensed under a  Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional