The role of nature in the self-ownership proviso

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2021.e78304

Palavras-chave:

Self-ownership, Proviso, Nature, Erick Mack

Resumo

Eric Mack defends a version of John Locke’s proviso. Mack applies his proviso to original appropriations, uses, and systems of private property. His proviso precludes severely disabling the world-interactive powers of others. Mack specifically warns against using concrete features of the natural world as a baseline for determine whether the proviso has been violated. While his proviso is plausible, I argue that he cannot. eschew employing the receptivity of the natural, unowned world to the extent that he suggests. We cannot determine whether one’s powers are disabled or diminished without knowing how receptive the world would be to those powers had a system of private property not arisen. The upshot of this paper is that the requirements of a well-formulated proviso is an empirical matter.

Biografia do Autor

Lamont Rodgers, Houston Community College

Professor at Department of Philosophy at Houston Community College, Stafford (USA). E-mail: lamont.rodgers@hccs.edu

Referências

BARNES, Gordon. Wilt Chamberlain Redux? Philosophia vol. 44, no. 1 2016, pp. 79-85.

BLOCK, Walter. Evictionism is Libertarian; Departurism is Not: Critical Comment on Parr Libertarian Papers vol. 3. 2011. Art. 36.

COHEN, G.A. Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality Cambridge University Press, 1995.

FRIED, Barbara. Wilt Chamberlain Revisited: Nozick’s “Justice in Transfer” and the Problem of Market-Based Distribution. Philosophy & Public Affairs 24(3) 1995, pp. 226-245: 230n.

LOCKE, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Kansas: Digireads.com 2005.

MACHAN, Tibor. Self-ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(1) 2009, pp. 93-98.

MACK, Eric. Distributive justice and the tensions of Lockeanism. Social Philosophy and Policy 1 1983, pp. 132–150.

MACK, Eric. Moral individualism: Agent-relativity and deontic constraints. Social Philosophy & Policy 7(1) 1989, pp. 81-111.

MACK, Eric. Self-Ownership and the Right of Property. The Monist 73 (4) 1990, pp. 519–543.

MACK, Eric. The Self-ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso. Social Philosophy & Policy 12(1) 1995 pp.186-218.

MACK, Eric. Deontic Restrictions are not agent-relative restrictions. Social Philosophy & Policy 15(2) 1998, pp. 61-83.

MACK, Eric. The Self-ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso. Social Philosophy & Policy 12(1). 1995, pp. 186-218.

MACK, Eric Self-ownership, Marxism, and egalitarianism: Part I: Challenges to Historical Entitlement. Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 1(1) 2002, pp. 75-108. (Mack 2002a).

MACK, Eric. Self-ownership, Marxism, and egalitarianism: Part II: Challenges to the Self-ownership Thesis. Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 1(2) 2002, pp. 237-27 (Mack 2002b).

MACK, Eric. John Locke on Property. 2013. In Liberty Matters. Available at: https://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/lm-locke.

MACK, Eric. Libertarianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2018.

NOZICK, Robert. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

ROARK, Eric. Applying Locke’s Proviso to Unappropriated Natural Resources. Political Studies 60(3) 2012, pp. 687-702.

RODGERS, Lamont and Rodgers, Travis Joseph. Wilt Chamberlain Redux: Thinking Clearly About Externalities and the Promises of Justice. Reason Papers 39, no. 2 Winter 2017, pp. 90-104.

SCHMIDTZ, David. The Institution of Property. Social Philosophy and Policy 11(2), 1994, pp. 42-62.

STEINER, Hillel. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

THOMSON, Judith Jarvis. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

WALDRON, Jeremy. Enough and as Good Left for Others. The Philosophical Quarterly 29(117) 1976, pp. 319-328.

WENDT, Fabian. “The Sufficiency Proviso.” In Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by J. BRENNAN, B. VAN DER VOSSEN, and D. SCHMIDTZ, 169–83. Routledge: New York, 2018.

ZWOLINSKI, MATT. “Property Rights, Coercion, and the Welfare State: The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income for All.” The Independent Review 19(4) (1995), pp. 515-529.

Publicado

2021-04-30

Edição

Seção

Artigos - Fluxo Contínuo