Rancière´s archives: the aesthetes-workers of the nineteenth century and the issue of emancipation in human formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2024.e91342Palavras-chave:
Emancipation, Workers' narratives, Historical project, ArchivesResumo
This paper aims to investigate the relation between the path Jacques Rancière builds up through the workers’ archives from the nineteenth century in France and the following conceptualization of emancipation. From aesthetic “narratives”, from a storytelling of lonely words and impossible identifications with conscious principles of the great proletarian collective discourse this paper intends to show how the sense of emancipation changes: from social collectivity to intellectual individuality. Question of method it will say Rancière. It´s on the attempt to think about the importance of the archive to the construction of such “rancierean methodology” that this paper will focus. By analyzing that the Proletarian nights were not simply made of miseries of an exhaustive subjection of working bodies, but also of poems, chants and prose, it made it possible thinking in an aesthetic that includes the workers, in aesthetes-workers. Not from the perspective of a “popular aesthetic”, always hostage of its parallel of an “erudite aesthetic”, but only from one and same aesthetic. The ancestral separation between the hands of working and the vision/contemplation of the beauty and the following hierarchical subordination of the former by the latter is, then, unsettled. The question of emancipation, therefore, reassumes by aesthetic a new centrality. And the notion of archive is fundamental to think of how this conceptual re-elaborations proposed by Rancière in aesthetic and politics arise from the use of thinking based on witnesses, letters and narratives registered in “class” journals, in a memorial word which before preserving a sacred truth, unique, from a time, gives us proofs of a polyphony and a poligraphy capable of disturbing the right conviction in which is based all attempts to erase the contradictions on behalf of a conscious historical project, either in political philosophy or in philosophy of education.
Referências
AGAMBEM, G. Remnants of Auschwitz: the witness and the archive New York: Zone Books, 2002.
AGAMBEM, G. Ce qui reste d´Auschwitz. L´archive et le témoin. Homo Sacer III, Paris: Éditions Payot, 1999.
VILELA, E. Silêncios tangíveis. Corpo, resistência e testemunho nos espaços contemporâneos do abandono. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 2010.
RANCIÈRE, J. Disagreement: politics and philosophy. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.
RANCIÈRE, J. (ed.) Le philosophe plébéien. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 1983.
RANCIÈRE, J. The nights of labor. The workers´ dream in Nineteenth Century France. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais e direitos de publicação sobre suas obras, sem restrições.
Ao submeterem seus trabalhos, os autores concedem à revista ethic@ o direito exclusivo de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International. Essa licença permite que terceiros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho publicado, desde que seja dado o devido crédito de autoria e à publicação original neste periódico.
Os autores também têm permissão para firmar contratos adicionais, separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho neste periódico (por exemplo: depositar em repositório institucional, disponibilizar em site pessoal, publicar traduções ou incluí-lo como capítulo de livro), desde que com reconhecimento da autoria e da publicação inicial na revista ethic@.
