Fly and Worms in Science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8034.2021.e68281

Abstract

Many studies on material culture of science reconstruct processes of choice and transformation of certain organisms into experimental models in the life sciences. Such stories address how living organisms have been shaped, standardized, linked to laboratory devices and converted into preferred instruments for certain types of research. This happened with the drosophila in classical genetic research, for Kohler; with the worm C. elegans in molecular genetics, for Chadaverian. This article revisits these narratives and gives a new version of these histories, emphasizing the contribution of organisms, their bodies and behaviors to the research. But it is not so much about telling the story from the animals point of view as it is about showing how humans and other living beings have shaped and affected each other in science.

Author Biography

Iara Maria de Almeida Souza, Universidade Federal da Bahia

Porfessora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da UFBA, desenvolve pesquisa nas áreas de antropologia da ciência e relação humano animal.

References

CASSIDY, Rebeca; MULLIN, Molly. Where the wild things are now: domestication reconsidered. Oxford: Berg, 2007.

CHADAREVIAN, Soraya. Of Worms and Programmes: Caenorhabditis Elegans and the Study of Development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 81–105, 1998.

CLARKE, Adele; FUJIMURA, Joan. The Right tools for the job: at work in twentieth-century life sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

CREAGER, Angela. The Life of a Virus – Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930 – 1965. Chicago: The University Chicago Press, 2002.

KOHLER, R. E. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1994.

KOHN, Eduardo. How Forests Think: toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. 267 p.

KNORR-CETINA, Karin. (1997). Sociality with Objects – Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 14(4): 1 -30.

LANDECKER, Hannah. Culturing life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

LATOUR, Bruno. Reagregando o Social. Salvador: Edufba, Edusc, 2012.

LOGAN, Cheryl A. ‘Before There Were Standards: The Role of Test Animals in the Production of Empirical Generality in Physiology’. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(2): 329–63, 2002.

LÖWY, Ilana; GUADILLIERE, Jean-Paul. Disciplining Cancer: Mice and the Practice of Genetic Purity. In The Invisible Industrialist - Manufactures and the Production of Scientific Knowledge, organizado por Jean-Paul Guadilliere e Ilana Löwy. New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 1998.

NIMMO, Richie. Actor-network theory and methodology: social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(3) 108-119, 2011.

PICKERING, Andrew. The Mangle of Practice – Time, Agency & Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

RADER, Karen A. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

RHEINBERGER, H. J. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.

STENGERS, Isabelle. 2011. Comparison as a Matter of Concern. Common Knowledge, 17 (1): 48-63.

TSING, Anna Lowenhaupt. Viver nas Ruínas: paisagens multiespécies no Antropoceno. Brasília: IEB Mil Folhas, 2019.

Published

2021-06-16

How to Cite

SOUZA, Iara Maria de Almeida. Fly and Worms in Science. Ilha Revista de Antropologia, Florianópolis, v. 23, n. 2, p. 27–46, 2021. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8034.2021.e68281. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/68281. Acesso em: 26 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles