Animal culture in debate: contributions from multispecies studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8034.2025.e108678

Keywords:

Culture, Archaeology, Animals, Multispecies

Abstract

This article analyzes, from the perspective of multispecies studies and multispecies archaeology, the question of culture and the material culture of non-human animals, a central theme of my Master’s dissertation in Archaeology (2011). The original research developed ethical, ontological, and epistemological reflections on the recognition of animals’ cultural and symbolic capacities, considering materiality and its discursivity in relational and multitemporal contexts, as well as the multivocality of the animal world. It was grounded in a post-processualist approach that understands landscape as material culture and in ecological-political and relational approaches from anthropology and animal studies, combining bibliographic research and ethnography with ethologists and capuchin monkeys (Sapajus) in Brazil. The article aims to update this theoretical debate, overcoming previous limitations and incorporating perspectives that recognize animals as historical and archaeological agents in hybrid or multispecies communities, conceiving culture as a relational, historical, and collective field produced through interspecific interactions.

Author Biography

Carolina Alves d' Almeida, Pesquisador Autônomo

Doutora em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (2018) e em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2019), com período de doutorado sanduíche no Centro de Humanidades da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal). Mestre em Arqueologia pelo Museu Nacional/UFRJ (2011) e graduada em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2009). Realizou pós-doutorado em História no Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da Universidade Federal Fluminense (2023). Possui formação pedagógica em História (Universidade Estácio de Sá, 2022) e pós-graduação lato sensu em Educação Patrimonial pelo Instituto de Pesquisa e Memória Pretos Novos (2022). Atua como professora de História na rede pública e desenvolve pesquisas nos campos da História das Ciências, Antropologia da Ciência e História Ambiental, com ênfase em estudos animais, estudos multiespécies, arqueologia multiespécies e humanidades ambientais.

References

BERGER, John. About Looking. São Paulo: Ed. Pantheon Books, 1980.

BIRCH, Suzanne E. Pilaar (ed.). Multispecies Archaeology. London; New York: Routledge, 2018.

BOAS, Franz. Antropologia Cultural. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, [1896] 2004. (Org. de Celso Castro)

BOESCH, C.; BOESCH, H. Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, v. 54, p. 86-99, 1990.

BOESCH, C.; TOMASELLO, M. Chimpanzee and Human Cultures. Current Anthropology, v. 39, n. 5, December, 1998.

BOESCH, C. From material to symbolic cultures: Culture in primates. In: VALSINER, Jaan (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 677-692.

CRUTZEN, Paul J.; STOERMER, Eugene F. The Anthropocene. IGBP – International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Newsletter 41, p. 17, 2000.

DALÉN, Love et al. Ancient Wolf Genome Reveals an Early Divergence of Domestic Dog Ancestors and Admixture into High-Latitude Breeds. Current Biology, 2015.

DEMINICIS, Rafael Borges; MUNIZ, Tiago Silva Alves; D’ALMEIDA, Carolina Alves. Manguebeat e arqueologia: será que dá “samba aqui”? Um ensaio etnoarqueológico por ontologias relacionais. Tessituras, Pelotas, RS, v. 10, n. 1, 2022.

DE WAAL, Frans; TYACK, Peter L. (ed.). Animal Social Complexity: Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2003.

DE WAAL, Frans. Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. 3. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.

DESPRET, Vinciane. Ethology between Empathy, Standpoint and Perspectivism: the case of Arabian babblers. [2010]. Disponível em: http://vincianedespret.blogspot.com/2010/04/ethology-between-empathy-standpoint-and.html. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2010.

DROUIN-HANS, Anne-Marie. Hierarchy of Races, Hierarchy in Gender: Anténor Firmin and Clémence Royer. Ludus Vitalis, v. XIII, n. 23, p. 163-180, 2005.

DUSSEL, Enrique. Filosofia da libertação na América Latina. Tradução de Luis Eduardo W. Kress. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.

FUENTES, A. Human-Nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to Anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, v. 2, n. 2, p. 1-11, 2006.

FUNARI, P. P. A.; HALL, M.; JONES, S. (org.). Historical Archaeology: Back from the edge. Londres: Routledge, 1999. 350p.

GALEF JR., B. G. The Question of Animal Culture. Human Nature, v. 3, n. 2, 1992.

GEERTZ, Clifford. A Interpretação das Culturas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, [1973], 1989.

GOODALL, J. Uma janela para a vida: 30 Anos com os Chimpanzés da Tanzânia. Trad: E. Francisco Alves. São Paulo: Jorge Zahar, 1991. 280p.

GOULD, Stephen Jay. A falsa medida do homem. Tradução de Vera Ribeiro. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1991.

HARAWAY, Donna. Antropoceno, Capitaloceno, Plantationoceno, Chthuluceno: fazendo parentes. ClimaCom Cultura Científica – Pesquisa, Jornalismo e Arte I, ano 3, n. 5, 2016.

HARVEY, Joy Dorothy. Almost a Man of Genius: Clémence Royer, Feminism, and Nineteenth- Century Science (Lives of Women in Science). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1997. 374p.

HIRATA, S.; WATANABE, K.; MASAO, K. “Sweet-Potato Washing” Revisited. In: MATSUZAWA, T. (ed.). Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior. Tokyo: Springer, 2008. p. 487-508.

HODDER, Ian (ed.). Archaeological theory today. Cambridge; Polity Press, Bridge Street, 2001.

HODDER, Ian. Archaeology beyond dialogue. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003.

HRDY, Sarah Blaffer. Mãe Natureza: uma visão feminina da evolução – maternidade, filhos e seleção natural. Trad: Álvaro Cabral. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2001.

IMANISHI, Kinji. The evolution of human nature (in Japanese). In: IMANISHI, Kinji (ed.). Ningen. Tokyo: Mainichi-shinbunsha, 1952. p. 36-94.

IMANISHI, Kinji. Identification: A Process of Enculturation in the Subhuman Society of Macaca fuscata. Primates, v. 1, p. 1-29, 1975a.

IMANISHI, Kinji. Social Behavior in Japanese Monkeys, Macaca fuscata. Psychologia, v. 1, p. 47-54, 1975b.

INGOLD, Tim. Humanity and Animality. In: INGOLD, Tim (org.). Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Humanity, Culture and Social Life. London: Routledge, 1994. p. 14-32.

INGOLD, Tim. The Perception of the Environment. London and New York: Routledge. 2000.

JESUS, Rodrigo Marcos de; NEGRI, Edson Cleber; CÂNDIDO, Juarid Rios (org.). Filosofia e consciência negra: desconstruindo o racismo. Cuiabá: EdUFMT, 2018. Coleção Saberes e Práticas 1.

KAWAMURA, S. The process of sub-culture propagation among Japanese macaques. Primates, v. 2, p. 43-60, 1959.

KIRKSEY, S.; HELMREICH, S. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, v. 25, n. 4, p. 545-576, 2010.

KROPOTKIN, Piotr. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, Mineola: Dover, [1902] 2012.

LARAIA, Roque de B. Cultura: um conceito antropológico. 14. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2001.

LATOUR, B. Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 1994.

LATOUR, B. Reagregando o Social. Bauru, SP; Salvador, BA: EdUSC; EdUFBA, 2012.

LATOUR, B.; WOOLGAR, S. A vida de laboratório: a produção dos fatos científicos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume & Dumará, 1997.

LESTEL, D. As Origens Animais da Cultura. Trad. M. J. Batalha Reis. Paris: Ed. Instituto Piaget, 2001.

LESTEL, D.; BRUNOIS, F.; GAUNET, F. Etho-ethnology and ethno-ethology. Social Science Information, v. 45, p. 155-177, 2010.

LEWONTIN, R. C. The Apportionment of Human Diversity. Evol. Biol., n. 6, p. 381-398, 1972.

MACGILLAVRY, T. et al. The origins and functions of bowers in the Bowerbirds: a review and synthesis. Emu – Austral Ornithology, p. 1-16, 2025.

MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Textos I. São Paulo: Edições Sociais, 1977.

MAZOYER, Marcel; ROUDART, Laurence. História das agriculturas no mundo: do neolítico à crise contemporânea. Trad. Cláudia F. F. B. Ferreira. São Paulo; Brasília, DF: Editora Unesp; NEAD, 2010.

MACGILLAVRY, T. et al. The origins and functions of bowers in the Bowerbirds: a review and synthesis. Emu – Austral Ornithology, p. 1-16, 2025.

MCGREW, W. C. Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.

MOL, A. Ontological politics: a word and some questions. In: LAW, J.; HASSARD, J. (org.). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1999. p. 74-89.

MOORE, Jason W. (org.). Antropoceno ou Capitaloceno? Natureza, história e a crise do capitalismo. Trad: Antônio Xerxenesky, Fernando S. e Silva. São Paulo: Elefante, 2022.

MORGAN, Lewis H. Ancient Society. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1877.

NAGASAWA, Miho et al. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 2015.

OTTONI, Eduardo. Uso de ferramentas e tradições comportamentais em macacos-prego (Sapajus spp). 2009. 178p. Tese (Livre Docência) – Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009.

OVERTON, N.; HAMILAKIS, Y. A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, v. 20, Issue 2, p. 111-136, 2013a.

OVERTON, N.; HAMILAKIS, Y. A multi-species archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, v. 20, Issue 2, p. 159-173, 2013b.

PASCUAL-GARRIDO, A.; CARVALHO, S.; ALMEIDA-WARREN, K. Primate archaeology 3.0. Am J Biol Anthropol., v. 183, n. 3, p. e24835, 2024.

PENA, Sérgio D. J.; BORTOLINI, Maria Cátira. Pode a genética definir quem deve se beneficiar das cotas universitárias e demais ações afirmativas? Estudos Avançados, on-line, v. 18, n. 50, 2004.

PINK, Sarah. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., [2009] 2017.

RAPCHAN, Eliane S. Por uma Teoria das Culturas de Chimpanzés: Reflexões sobre Etnografia, Primatologia e EtoArqueologia. Revista de Arqueologia, v. 24, n. 1, p. 112-129, 2011.

RILEY, E. P. Ethnoprimatology: toward reconciliation between biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, v. 2, n. 2, 2006.

SAVALLI, C.; RESENDE, B.; GAUNET, F. Eye Contact Is Crucial for Referential Communication in Pet Dogs. PLoS ONE, v. 11, n. 9, 2016.

SCHWARCZ, Lilia Moritz. O espetáculo das raças: cientistas, instituições e questão racial no Brasil – 1870-1930. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1993.

SHANKS, M.; TILLEY, C. Social Theory and Archaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 1988.

SMUTS, Barbara. Barbara Smuts. In: COETZEE, J. M. A Vida dos Animais. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2002. p. 128-145.

SOUSA, Cláudia. The use of tokens by chimpanzees [Texto policopiado]: computer controlled experiments as a way of assessing chimpanzee cognition. 2003. 76f. Tese (Doutorado em Antropologia) – Kyoto University, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto, 2003.

SOUSA, Cláudia; MATSUZAWA, Tetsuro. The use of tokens as rewards and tools by chimpanzés (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn., v. 4, p. 213-221, 2001.

STOCKHAMMER, Philipp W. Lost in Things An Archaeologist’s Perspective on theEpistemological Potential of Objects. Nature and Culture, v. 10, n. 3, p. 269-283, 2015.

TEMPLETON, A. R. Human races: a genetic and evolutionary perspective. American Anthropologist, v. 100, p. 632-650, 1999.

TILLEY, C. Interpreting material culture. In: HODDER, Ian (Ed). The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. London and New York: Routledge, 1989. p.185-194.

THOMAS, Julian. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: HODDER, Ian (ed), Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001. p. 165-186.

TSING, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.

TSING, Anna Lowenhaupt. Viver nas ruínas: paisagens multiespécies no antropoceno. Brasília, DF: IEB Mil Folhas, 2019. (Ed. Thiago Mota Cardoso, Rafael Victorino Devos)

TOTH, Nicholas; SCHICK, Kathy. The Oldowan: Tool Making of Early Hominins and Chimpanzees Compared. The Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 38, p. 289-305, 2009.

TYLOR, Edward. Primitive Culture. Londres, John Murray & Co. Nova York, Harper Torchbooks. [1871] 1958.

VAN SCHAIK, C. P., DEANER, R. O.; MERRILL, M. Y. The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. Journal of Human Evolution, v. 36, p. 719-741, 1999.

VAN SCHAIK, Carel P. V.; PRADHAN, Gauri R. A model for tool-use traditions in primates: implications for the coevolution of culture and cognition. Journal of Human Evolution, v. 44, p. 645-664, 2003.

VAN DOOREN, Thom; KIRKSEY, Eben; MÜNSTER, Ursula. Estudos multiespécies: cultivando artes de atentividade. Trad. Susana Oliveira Dias. ClimaCom, Campinas, ano 3, n. 7, p. 39-66, 2016.

WATANABE, K. A Review of 50 Years of Research on the Japanese Monkeys of Koshima: Status and Dominance. In: MATSUZAWA, T. (ed.) Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior. Tokyo: Springer, 2008. p. 405-417.

WHITEN, A. et al. Cultures in Chimpanzees. Nature, v. 399, p. 682-685, 1999.

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

ALVES D’ ALMEIDA, Carolina. Animal culture in debate: contributions from multispecies studies. Ilha Revista de Antropologia, Florianópolis, v. 27, n. 3, 2026. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8034.2025.e108678. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/108678. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles