.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/%25xAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to present the contribution by three authors: J. C. Ferretti, R. Bohslavsky and J. P. Sartre with regard to the definition of "human choice" and its relation to the professional aspect. In this sense we are going to clear up - with regard to each of these authors - his critiques, basic definitions and the elements involved in the problem. At the same time, we are going to relate them one with another, in order to point at their compatibilities and/ or incompatibilities as well as the pertinence of their reflections for the advancement of psychology in the field of vocational guidance. To clear "what is an human choice", as far as this is possible, as far as this represents a fallacy, which elements make it up or, in other words, which determinants play a role when we take this approach: all theseare theoretical and practical issues of vital importance when we work or research in the field of vocational guidance.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons
