.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/%25xAbstract
This work aims at presenting some theoretical considerations about thediscourse of legal sentences from cases of violence against women. Legal discourse is a dominant, hierarchical kind of discourse, based on a structure of exclusion and discrimination of several non-powerful social minorities, such as poor people, blacks, homosexuals, women, etc. Hence the importance of carrying out a critical analysis of legal texts, thus helping to demystify the aura of objectivity and impartiality that involves the law. The linguistic analysis of legal decisions from cases of violence against women, for instance, may help us to understand how women are described in these texts, as well as what subject positions this type of discourse establishes for men and women, and for legal practitioners (judges, etc). By investigating the ideologies that underlie legal texts, and the social relations that these texts construct for its producers and its consumers, this work hopes to encourage a critical reading of, and a form of resistance to, legal decisions (be it by linguists, by lawyers, by language students, by legal students, etc).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons

