Conexões sociais e rotatividade involuntária do CEO: evidências do mercado brasileiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2021.e76116Resumo
Este estudo teve como objetivo investigar se as conexões sociais entre os membros do conselho de administração (CA) e o Chief Executive Officer (CEO) diminuem a probabilidade de rotatividade involuntária do CEO no contexto brasileiro. A partir dos dados do Formulário de Referência entre 2012 e 2018 das empresas listadas na Bolsa Brasil Balcão [B]3, desenvolveu-se um Índice de Conexão Social (ICS). Os resultados da regressão logística indicam que a probabilidade de rotatividade involuntária do CEO diminui quando o ICS aumenta, consistente com estudos precedentes. O resultado se manteve mesmo na presença de indicadores de governança corporativa e de demais controles. Os resultados evidenciam, assim, que as conexões sociais afetam o monitoramento do CA quanto à rotatividade, bem como que a análise agregada dos dados através do ICS proposto captura melhor este efeito no mercado brasileiro.
Referências
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The journal of finance, 62(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
Alexandre, N. M. C., & Coluci, M. Z. O. (2011). Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16, 3061-3068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
Balsam, S., Kwack, S. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2017). Network connections, CEO compensation and involuntary turnover: The impact of a friend of a friend. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 220-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.001
Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M., & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 12(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00318.x
Black, B., Carvalho, A. G., Khanna, V., Kim, W., & Yurtoglu, B. (2017). Corporate governance indices and construct validity. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(6), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12215
Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão [B3]. (2018). Regulamento do novo mercado. Disponível em http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/regulacao/estrutura-normativa/listagem/
Brookman, J., & Thistle, P. D. (2009). CEO tenure, the risk of termination and firm value. Journal of Corporate finance, 15(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.002
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2004). Corporate governance and firm performance. Available at SSRN 586423. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.586423
Bushman, R., Dai, Z., & Wang, X. (2010). Risk and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.001
Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the financial aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee & Co. Ltd., London, United Kingdom
Campbell, S. M., Braspenning, J. A., Hutchinson, A., & Marshall, M. (2002). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11(4), 358-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.4.358
Campbell, T. C., Gallmeyer, M., Johnson, S. A., Rutherford, J., & Stanley, B. W. (2011). CEO optimism and forced turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 695-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.004
Céspedes, J., González, M., & Molina, C. A. (2010). Ownership and capital structure in Latin America. Journal of business research, 63(3), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.010
Chahine, S., & Goergen, M. (2013). The effects of management-board ties on IPO performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.02.001
Chahine, S., & Goergen, M. (2014). Top management ties with board members: How they affect pay–performance sensitivity and IPO performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.007
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell‐side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409-1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01574.x
Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2014). Co-opted boards. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(6), 1751-1796. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu011
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2016). Métodos de Pesquisa em Administração-12ª edição. McGraw Hill Brasil.
Crisóstomo, V. L., de Freitas Brandão, I., & López-Iturriaga, F. J. (2020). Large shareholders’ power and the quality of corporate governance: An analysis of Brazilian firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101076
Fracassi, C., & Tate, G. (2012). External networking and internal firm governance. The Journal of finance, 67(1), 153-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01706.x
Gao, H., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2017). CEO turnover–performance sensitivity in private firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 583-611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000126
Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in nursing & health, 20(3), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3%3C269::AID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO;2-G
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria básica-5. Amgh Editora.
Guo, L., & Masulis, R. W. (2015). Board structure and monitoring: New evidence from CEO turnovers. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(10), 2770-2811. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv038
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797-1832. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl030
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 96-118.
Hoitash, U. (2011). Should independent board members with social ties to management disqualify themselves from serving on the board?. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0660-5
Hoitash, U., & Mkrtchyan, A. (2019). Directors’ ties to non-CEO executives: Information advantage or entrenchment?. Available at SSRN 3372471. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3372471
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90
Hu, J., & Kim, J. B. (2019). The relative usefulness of cash flows versus accrual earnings for CEO turnover decisions across countries: The role of investor protection. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 34, 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.02.005
Hwang, B. H., & Kim, S. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of financial economics, 93(1), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.07.005
IBGC - Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2015). Código das melhores práticas de governança corporativa.
Interagentes, G. (2016). Código brasileiro de governança corporativa. Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa–IBGC.
Ishii, J., & Xuan, Y. (2014). Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(3), 344-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.007
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. Bmj, 311(7001), 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376
Kang, J. K., Liu, W. L., Low, A., & Zhang, L. (2018). Friendly boards and innovation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 45, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.09.007
Kaplan, S. N., & Minton, B. A. (2012). How has CEO turnover changed? International Review of Finance, 12(1), 57-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2011.01135.x
Khedmati, M., Sualihu, M. A., & Yawson, A. (2020). CEO-director ties and labor investment efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101492
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561-1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht020
Krishnan, G. V., Raman, K. K., Yang, K., & Yu, W. (2011). CFO/CEO-board social ties, Sarbanes-Oxley, and earnings management. Accounting horizons, 25(3), 537-557. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50028
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Silva, A. L. P. D., Lana, J., & Marcon, R. (2018). Agreeing and impacting: The effect of the shareholders' agreement on firms' market value. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.1.6
Liu, Y. (2014). Outside options and CEO turnover: The network effect. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.004
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Martins, G. (2006). Sobre confiabillidade e validade. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios-RBGN, 8(20), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v8i20.51
McGuinness, P. B. (2018). IPO firm performance and its link with board officer gender, family-ties and other demographics. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 499-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3295-3
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Nguyen, B. D. (2012). Does the Rolodex matter? Corporate elite's small world and the effectiveness of boards of directors. Management science, 58(2), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1457
OECD - Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo. (2016). Directrices de la OCDE sobre el Gobierno Corporativo de las Empresas Públicas.
Parrino, R. (1997). CEO turnover and outside succession a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 46(2), 165-197.
Perlin, M., Kirch, G., & Vancin, D. (2018). Accessing financial reports and corporate events with GetDFPData. Available at SSRN 3128252. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128252
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Renneboog, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Director networks, turnover, and appointments. European Financial Management, 26(1), 44-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12213
Schmidt, B. (2015). Costs and benefits of friendly boards during mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 424-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.007
Sutton, C., Veliyath, R., Pieper, T. M., Hair Jr, J. F., & Caylor, M. (2018). Secondary agency conflicts: A synthesis and proposed measurement model. Long Range Planning, 51(5), 720-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.004
Tung, F. (2011). The Puzzle of Independent Directors: New Learning. Boston University Law Review, 91(3), 1175-1190.
Vieira, C. A., & Martins, O. (2018). Influência da estrutura do conselho de administração e do controle corporativo no turnover do CEO das empresas abertas no Brasil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 15(34), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2018v15n34p181
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of management Journal, 42(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.5465/256871
Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of management studies, 45(1), 196-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados neste periódico são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a Revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta Revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais, de exercício profissional e para gestão pública. A Revista adotou a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional - CC BY NC ND. Esta licença permite acessar, baixar (download), copiar, imprimir, compartilhar, reutilizar e distribuir os artigos desde que com a citação da fonte, atribuindo os devidos créditos de autoria. Nesses casos, nenhuma permissão é necessária por parte dos autores ou dos editores. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou um capítulo de livro).
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
