Controles gerenciais e fatores comportamentais como direcionadores do gerenciamento de resultados
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2022.e83462Palavras-chave:
Alavancas de controle , Gerenciamento de resultados, Criatividade , EmpoderamentoResumo
O uso das alavancas de controle gerencial pode ajudar as organizações na avaliação dos resultados e minimizar comportamentos oportunistas dos gestores. Pode moldar os fatores comportamentais ao oferecer gatilho, em determinadas ocasiões, às práticas de gerenciamento de resultados. O objetivo do estudo é analisar se o uso das alavancas de controle gerencial afeta a relação entre os fatores comportamentais de empoderamento e criatividade dos gestores e a propensão ao gerenciamento de resultados. A amostra contempla 82 respondentes (gestores de empresas brasileiras), para tratamento dos dados utilizou-se da equação estrutural. Os resultados sugerem que empresas que priorizam o uso das alavancas de controle gerencial pelos sistemas de limites e diagnóstico criam barreiras às práticas de gerenciamento de resultados. Por outro lado, empresas com uso das alavancas pelos sistemas de crenças e interativo abrem espaço para os gestores exercerem o comportamento oportunista de gerenciamento de resultados.
Referências
Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S. & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
Amabile, T. M. & Sensabaugh, S. J. (1992). High creativity versus low creativity: What makes the difference. Readings in Innovation, (240), 19.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Anthony, R. N. & Govindarajan, V. (2008). Management Control Systems. AMGH Editora.
Arjaliès, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003
Barton, H. & Barton, L. C. (2011). Trust and psychological empowerment in the Russian work context. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.001
Bertero, C. O. (1996). Cultura organizacional e instrumentalização do poder. Cultura e Poder nas Organizações, 2, 29-44.
Beuren, I. M. & Vaz, P. V. C. (2015). Papel mediador do pacote do system de controle gerencial na relação entre estratégia ambiental e performance gerencial. In: Anais do Congresso USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Bharadwaj, S., & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovation happen in organizations: Individual creativity mechanism, organizational creativity mechanism or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 424-434.
Bushman, R. M., Indjejikian, R. J. & Smith, A. (1996). CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(2), 161-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00416-5
Casado, T. (2002). A motivação e o trabalho. As pessoas na organização. São Paulo: Gente, p. 247-258, 2002.
Cintra, Y. C. (2011). A integração da sustentabilidade às práticas de controle gerencial das empresas no Brasil (Doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo).
Corsun, D. L. & Enz, C. A. (1999). Predicting psychological empowerment among service workers: The effect of support-based relationships. Human Relations, 52(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016984802948
Cruz, A. P. C. D., Frezatti, F. & Bido, D. D. S. (2015). Estilo de liderança, controle gerencial e inovação: Papel das alavancas de controle. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 19(6), 772-794. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2015150099
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DeFond, M. L. & Park, C. W. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00004-9
Diehl, C. A. & de Souza, M. A. (2008). Alavancas de Controle: identificando o alinhamento estratégico. Revista Digital del Instituto Internacional de Costos, (2), 41-66.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P. & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040653
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Garcia Osma, B., Gomez-Conde, J. & Lopez-Valeiras, E. (2019). Management Accounting and Control Systems and Earnings Management: Effects on Future Firm Performance. Available at SSRN 3449178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449178
Gomez-Conde, J., Lunkes, R. J. & Rosa, F. S. (2019). Environmental innovation practices and operational performance. The joint effects of management accounting and control systems and environmental training. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3327
Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E. & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407916
Gkorezis, P., & Petridou, E. (2008). Employees' psychological empowerment via intrinsic and extrinsic rewards. Academy of Health Care Management Journal, 4(1).
Gonzalez, L. P., Jiménez, D. J. & Lorente, Á. R. M. (2013, September). Total Quality Management and its relationship with empowerment and commitment: their effects on firm performance. Proceedings in EIIC-The 2nd Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference (No. 1).
Greenfield, A. C., Norman, C. S. & Wier, B. (2008). The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earnings management behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9629-4
Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
Hair, J. F.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hanlon, M. & Shevlin, T. (2005). Book-tax conformity for corporate income: An introduction to the issues. Tax Policy and the Economy, 19, 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/tpe.19.20061897
Healy, P. (1985). The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 85-107.
Healy, P. M. & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems 2016, 116, 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hope, O. K. & Wang, J. (2018). Management deception, big-bath accounting, and information asymmetry: Evidence from linguistic analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.02.004
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F. & Rajan, M. V. (1997). The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. Accounting Review, 231-255.
Kleba, M. E. & Wendausen, A. (2009). Empowerment: the process of strengthening the subjects in the areas of social participation and political democratization. Saúde e Sociedade, 18(4), 733-743.
Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F. & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00879.x
Kruis, A. M., Speklé, R. F. & Widener, S. K. (2016). The levers of control framework: An exploratory analysis of balance. Management Accounting Research, 32, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.12.002
Martinez, A. L. & Martins, V. A. M. (2016). Alavancagem financeira e agressividade fiscal no Brasil. Revista de Contabilidade da UFBA, 10(3), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.9771/rc-ufba.v10i3.18383
Merchant, K. A. (1989). Rewarding results: Motivating profit center managers. Harvard Business School Press.
Merchant, K. A. & Rockness, J. (1994). The ethics of managing earnings: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)90013-2
Merchant, K. A. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Pearson Education.
Mills, P. K. & Ungson, G. R. (2003). Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925254
Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.005
Nisiyama, E. K. & Oyadomari, J. C. T. (2012). Sistemas de controle gerencial e o processo de inovação. Revista de Administração e Inovação (RAI), 9(1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v1i1.634
Noreen, E. (1988). The economics of ethics: A new perspective on agency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90010-4
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Validity. Psychometric Theory, 3, 99–132.
Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M. & Peek, E. (2010). Business analysis and valuation: text and cases. South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Pardo Del Val, M. P. & Lloyd, B. (2003). Measuring empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310463297
Pettigrew, A. M. (1996). A cultura das organizações é administrável. Cultura e poder nas organizações. São Paulo: Atlas, 145-153.
Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Ricco, M. F. F. (2004). Construindo perfis comportamentais em ambiente organizacional: os estilos de mobilização dos gestores brasileiros (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).
Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D. & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003
Schipper, K. (1989). Earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3(4), 91.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J. & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B. & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self‐regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304398
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Speklé, R. F., Van Elten, H. J. & Widener, S. K. (2017). Creativity and control: A paradox -Evidence from the levers of control framework. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51759
Tessier, S. & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ Levers of Control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.003
Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
Tuuli, M. M. & Rowlinson, S. (2009). Performance consequences of psychological empowerment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1334-1347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000103
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados neste periódico são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a Revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta Revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais, de exercício profissional e para gestão pública. A Revista adotou a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional - CC BY NC ND. Esta licença permite acessar, baixar (download), copiar, imprimir, compartilhar, reutilizar e distribuir os artigos desde que com a citação da fonte, atribuindo os devidos créditos de autoria. Nesses casos, nenhuma permissão é necessária por parte dos autores ou dos editores. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou um capítulo de livro).
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
