Impacto del reconocimiento de instrumentos financieros medidos a un valor razonable sobre la volatilidad del resultado

Autores/as

  • Laís Manfiolli Figueira Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)
  • Marcelo Augusto Ambrozini Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Controladoria e Contabilidade (PPGCC) e Professor-Associado do Departamento de Contabilidade da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n38p57

Resumen

Con el fin de verificar si el reconocimiento de instrumentos financieros medidos a valor razonable en el resultado llevó a una mayor volatilidad de los beneficios contables, se adoptaron testes estadísticos que analizaron la diferencia entre las variaciones de los beneficios netos que consideran instrumentos financieros evaluados a valor razonable ya costo amortizado, en el período entre 2010 y 2016, de las empresas brasileñas de capital abierto no financieras y Bancos con mayor Presencia en Bolsa. Después de analizar el efecto sobre el beneficio neto de las beneficios y pérdidas no realizadas de instrumentos financieros, se constató una tendencia a suavización, tanto para las empresas no financieras y para los Bancos, y no de aumento de la volatilidad como argumentó por los críticos la adopción del valor razonable. Esta tendencia puede tener un impacto positivo en la evaluación de estas empresas por el mercado de capitales y los acreedores, ya presentan una preferencia por beneficios consistentes a lo largo del tiempo, debido a su aversión al riesgo.

Biografía del autor/a

Laís Manfiolli Figueira, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)

Mestra em Controladoria e Contabilidade pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)

Marcelo Augusto Ambrozini, Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Controladoria e Contabilidade (PPGCC) e Professor-Associado do Departamento de Contabilidade da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)

Doutor em Administração de Organizações pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-RP/USP)

Citas

ABDEL-KHALIK, A. R. An empirical analysis of CEO risk aversion and propensity of smoothing earnings volatility. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, v. 22, n. 2, p. 201-235, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0702200209.

ALLEN, F; CARLETTI, E. Mark-to-market accounting and liquidity pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 45, n. 2-3, p. 358-378, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.02.005.

BARTH, M. E. Fair value accounting: evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. The Accounting Review, p. 1-25, 1994.

BARTH, M. E. Fair values and financial statement volatility. In: BORIO, C.; HUNTER, W. C.;

KAUFMAN, G. G.; TSATSARONIS, K. (Org.). The market discipline across countries and industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. Cap. 25, p. 323-334.

BARTH, M. E.; BEAVER, W. H.; LANDSMAN, W. R. Value-relevance of banks’ fair value disclosures under SFAS 107. The Accounting Review, p. 513–537, 1996.

BARTH, M. E.; BEAVER, W. H.; LANDSMAN, W. R. Are banks’ SFAS No. 107 fair-value disclosures relevant to investors? Bank Accounting and Finance, v. 10, p. 9-15, 1997.

BARTH, M. E.; BEAVER, W. H.; LANDSMAN, W. R. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, n. 1-3, p. 77-104, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2.

BARTH, M. E.; LANDSMAN, W. R.; WAHLEN; J. M. Fair value accounting: Effects on banks’ earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 19, p. 577-605, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(94)00141-O.

BARTON, J. Does the use of financial derivatives affect earnings management decisions? The Accounting Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.1.

CHOY, J. J.; MAO, C. X.; UPADHYAY, A. D. Earnings Management and Derivative Hedging with Fair Valuation: Evidence from the Effects of FAS 133. The Accounting Review, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1437-1467, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50972.

CPC – Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. CPC 38 – Instrumentos Financeiros: Reconhecimento e Mensuração. 2009.

CPC – Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. CPC 39 – Instrumentos Financeiros: Apresentação. 2009.

CPC – Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. CPC 40 (R1) – Instrumentos Financeiros: Evidenciação. 2012.

CPC – Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. CPC 48 – Instrumentos Financeiros. 2016.

CVM – Comissão de Valores Mobiliários. Disponível em: <http://www.cvm.gov.br>. Acesso entre agosto de 2016 e julho de 2017.

DARGENIDOU, C.; MCLEAY, S. The Impact of Introducing Estimates of the Future on International Comparability in Earnings Expectations. European Accounting Review, v. 19, n. 3, p. 511-534, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2010.496550.

DECHOW, P. M.; SLOAN, R. G.; SWEENEY, A. P. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, v. 70, n. 2, p. 193-225, 1995.

DUH, R. R.; HSU, A. W.; ALVES, P. A. P. The impact of IAS 39 on the risk-relevance of earnings volatility: Evidence from foreign banks cross-listed in the USA. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, v. 8, n. 1, p. 23-38, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2012.03.002.

ECKEL, N. The income smoothing hypothesis revisited. Abacus, v. 17, n. 1, p. 28-40, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1981.tb00099.x.

ECONOMÁTICA. Banco de Dados. Disponível em: <http://www.economatica.com.br>. Acesso em: julho de 2017.

EMERSON, D. J.; KARIM, K. E.; RUTLEDGE, W. R. Fair Value Accounting: A Historical Review Of The Most Controversial Accounting Issue In Decades. Journal of Business & Economics Research, v. 8, n. 4, p.77-86, 2010. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v8i4.705.

ENRIA, A.; CAPPIELLO, L.; DIERICK, F.; GRITTINI, S.; HARALAMBOUS, A.; MADDALONI, A.; MOLITOR, P. A. M.; PIRES, F.; POLONI, P. Fair value accounting and financial stability. European Central Bank (ECB) Occasional Paper, n. 13, p. 3-48, 2004.

FASB – Financial Accounting Standards Board. SFAS 133 – Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. 1998.

FÁVERO, L. P. L.; BELFIORE, P. P.; CHAN, B. L.; SILVA, F. L. Análise de Dados: Modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009.

FIECHTER, P. The Effects of the Fair Value Option under IAS 39 on the Volatility of Bank Earnings. Journal of International Accounting Research, v. 10, n. 1, p. 85-108, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2011.10.1.85.

GEBHARDT, G. Financial instruments in non-financial firms: what do we know? Accounting and Business Research, v. 42, n. 3, p. 267-289, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.681859.

GEBHARDT, G.; REICHARDT, R.; WITTENBRINK, C. Accounting for financial instruments in the banking industry: Conclusions from a simulation model. European Accounting Review, v. 13, n. 2, p. 341-371, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000204733a.

GOEL, A. M.; THAKOR, A. V. Why Do Firms Smooth Earnings? The Journal of Business, v. 76, n. 1, p. 151-192, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1086/344117.

GUTHRIE, K.; IRVING, J. H.; SOKOLOWSKY, J. Accounting choice and the fair value option. Accounting Horizons, v. 25, n. 3, p. 487-510, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50006.

GWILLIAM, D.; JACKSON, R. H. G. Fair value in financial reporting: Problems and pitfalls in practice A case study analysis of the use of fair valuation at Enron. Accounting Forum, v. 32, p. 240–259, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.01.003.

HAIL, L.; LEUZ, C.; WYSOCKI, P. Global Accounting Convergence and the Potential Adoption of IFRS by the U.S (Part I): Conceptual Underpinnings and Economic Analysis. Accounting Horizons, v. 24, n. 3, p. 355-394, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.355.

HAIR J. F.; BLACK, W. C.; BADIM, B. J.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L. Análise Multivariada de Dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.

HEALY, P. M.; PALEPU, K. G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 405-440, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0.

HODDER, L. D.; HOPKINS, P. E.; WAHLEN, J. M. Risk-relevance of fair-value income measures for commercial banks. The Accounting Review, v. 81, n. 2, p. 337-375, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.337.

IASB – International Accounting Standards Board. IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. 1998.

IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards. IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments. 2014.

JAGER, P. Fair value accounting, fragile bank balance sheets and crisis: A model. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 39, n. 2, p. 97-116, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.004.

KAMIN, J. Y.; RONEN, J. The smoothing of income numbers: Some empirical evidence on systematic differences among management-controlled and owner-controlled firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 3, n. 2, p. 141-157, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(78)90022-3.

KILIC, E.; LOBO, G. J.; RANASINGHE, T.; SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K. The impact of SFAS 133 on income smoothing by banks through loan loss provisions. The Accounting Review, v. 88, n. 1, p. 233-260, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50264.

LANDSMAN, W. R. Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum, p. 19-30, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730081.

LAUX, C.; LEUZ, C. The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 34, n. 6-7, p. 826-834, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.003.

LEV, B.; KUNITZKY, S. On the association between smoothing measures and the risk of common stocks. The Accounting Review, v. 49, n. 2, p. 259-270, 1974.

MOHD, E. Accounting for software development costs and information asymmetry. The Accounting Review, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1211-1231, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1211.

PETERSEN, M. A.; THIAGARAJAN, S. R. Risk measurement and hedging: With and without derivatives. Financial Management, v. 29, n.4, p. 5-29, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/3666367.

PINCUS, M.; RAJGOPAL, S. The interaction between accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and gas firms. The Accounting Review, v. 77, n. 1, p. 127-160, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.1.127.

PLANTIN, G.; SAPRA, H.; SHIN, H. S. Marking‐to‐Market: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Journal of Accounting Research, v. 46, n. 2, p. 435-460, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00281.x.

POWER, M. Fair Value Accounting, Financial Economics and Transformation of Reliability. Accounting and Business Research, v. 40, n. 3, p. 197-210, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663394

PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS (PwC). Point of View: A Proposal to Improve Fair Value Accounting. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/point-of-view/assets/pwc_pointofview_fairvalue_012009.pdf

RYAN, S. G. Fair value accounting: Understanding the issues raised by the credit crunch. Council of Institutional Investors, n. julho, p. 1-24, 2008.

SMITH, C. W.; STULZ, R. M. The determinants of firms' hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, v. 20, n. 4, p. 391-405, 1985. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330757.

SONG, C. J. An evaluation of FAS 159 fair value option: Evidence from the banking industry. Working Paper, Setembro, 2008. Disponível em: < http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279502>. Acesso em: abril de 2016.

TAYLOR, A.; GOODHART, C. Procyclicality and volatility in the financial system: The implementation of Basel II and IAS 39. In: Procyclicality of financial systems in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 2006. p. 9-37.

TRUEMAN, B.; TITMAN, S. An explanation for accounting income smoothing. Journal of accounting research, v. 26, Suplemento, p. 127-139, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491184.

WHALEN, R. C. The Subprime Crisis — Cause, Effect and Consequences. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, v. 17, n. 3, p. 219-235, 2008.

WILSON, J. O.; CASU, B.; GIRARDONE, C.; MOLYNEUX, P. Emerging themes in banking: recent literature and directions for future research. The British Accounting Review, v. 42, n. 3, p. 153-169, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.05.003.

ZHANG, H. Effect of derivative accounting rules on corporate risk-management behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 47, n. 3, p. 244-264, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.007.

Publicado

2019-03-31

Cómo citar

Figueira, L. M., & Ambrozini, M. A. (2019). Impacto del reconocimiento de instrumentos financieros medidos a un valor razonable sobre la volatilidad del resultado. Revista Contemporânea De Contabilidade, 16(38), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n38p57

Número

Sección

Artigos