The Social Flow of Historical Narratives and its Many Names

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7976.2019.e61832

Palavras-chave:

Geschichtsdidaktik, Public History, Lieu de Mémoire

Resumo

This paper is a first, partial, and short exposition of a larger research project on the phenomenon of the social flow of historical narratives, which is named for the first time here. It presents a preliminary analysis of four different Western scholar traditions that arose at the end of the twentieth century to understand this phenomenon, although the representatives of these traditions were not completely aware of it: the West German tradition called it Geschichtsdidaktik (History Didactics), the British/Californian/American tradition called it Public History, the Parisian/French tradition called it Lieu de Mémoire (Places of Memory) and the Soviet/Russian tradition called it Социальная Память (Social Memory). This analysis is based on Data Science/Digital Humanities methods related to semantic networks and used Linux and Python scripts to compare these four corpora. The main goal of this project is to present the differences between the official definitions and the semantic-based definitions to help scholars from these fields to think over their tradition on further research. The main conclusion of this study is that, although these four traditions are designed to deal with the same problem (the social flow of historical narratives), the analysis of the semantic networks of their corpora indicates that they have followed completely different paths. We have also noted some inconsistencies between the official discourse of these traditions and their semantic networks, which were described throughout the text.

Biografia do Autor

Oldimar Pontes Cardoso, Netbot Humanidades Digitais Ltda

Oldimar Cardoso é doutor e mestre em Educação, bacharel e licenciado em História pela Universidade de São Paulo (1992-2007). Foi diretor de Relações Públicas da Sociedade Internacional de Didática da História (2011-2014), docente e pesquisador da Cátedra de Didática da História da Universidade de Augsburgo (2008-2012), autor de livros didáticos de História pelas editoras Ática e Escala (2003-2016), formador de professores de História em 15 estados brasileiros (1997-2010), professor de História e coordenador pedagógico na escola básica (1992-2003). É fellow da Fundação Alexander von Humboldt (desde 2008) e do Instituto Georg Eckert (desde 2009). Desde 2011, produziu como diretor da Anima Educational Transmedia 1.055 objetos educacionais digitais, 93 livros didáticos digitais e criou diversas plataformas educacionais digitais.

Referências

ANDERSEN, H.; BARKER, P.; CHEN, X. The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

БАДРЕТДИНОВ, В. З. Проблемы Функционирования Социальной Памяти. Вестник КГУ им. Н.А. Некрасова, Кострома, Специальный выпуск, [without volume and number], p. 235-237, 2008.

BARRICELLI, M.; LÜCKE, M. Handbuch Praxis des Geschichtsunterrichts. Schwalbach: Wochenschau, 2012.

BENJAMIN, W. Der Erzähler. Betrachtungen zum Werk Nikolai Lesskows In: BENJAMIN, W. Gesammelte Schriften. Band 2. Teil 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991. p. 438-465.

BERGMANN, K. Handbuch der Geschichtsdidaktik. Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer, 1997.

CAO, L. Data Science Thinking: The Next Scientific, Technological and Economic Revolution. Cham: Springer, 2018.

CARDOSO, O. Didática da História. In: FERREIRA, M.; OLIVEIRA, M. (coord.). Dicionário de Ensino de História. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, 2019. p. 79-84.

CHERVEL, A. La culture scolaire: une approche historique. Paris: Belin, 1998.

GARDNER, J.; HAMILTON, P. The Oxford Handbook of Public History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

ELÍAS, C. Science on the Ropes: Decline of Scientific Culture in the Era of Fake News. Cham: Copernicus/Springer, 2019.

KALPOKAS, I. A Political Theory of Post-Truth. Cham: Springer, 2019.

KANWAL, J.; SMITH, K.; CULBERTSON, J.; KIRBY, S. Zipf’s Law of Abbreviation and the Principle of Least Effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 165, p. 45-52, 2017.

КОЛЕВАТОВ, В. А. Социальная память и познание. Москва: [s. n.], 1984.

KOHNKE, O. It’s Not Just About Technology: The People Side of Digitization. In: OSWALD, G.; KLEINEMEIER, M. (ed.). Shaping the Digital Enterprise: Trends and Use Cases in Digital Innovation and Transformation. Cham: Springer, 2017. p. 69-91.

KUHN, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.

ЛЕОНТЬЕВ, А. Н. Развитие памяти. Москва; [s. n.], 1931.

ЛЕОНТЬЕВ, А. Н. Биологическое и социальное в психике человека. Москва: [s. n.],1960.

ЛЕВАДА, Ю.А. Историческое сознание и научный метод. Философские проблемы исторической науки, Москва, [without volume and number], p. 203-213,1969.

LORDE, A. The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. In: LORDE, A. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Berkeley: Crossing Press, 2007. p. 110-113.

ЛУРИЯ, A. Р. Об историческом развитии познавательных процессов. Москва: [s.n.], 1974.

MARCUM, J. A. From Paradigm to Disciplinary Matrix and Exemplar. In: KINDI, V.; ARABATZIS, T. Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions revisited. New York: Routledge, 2012.

MAYER, U. Wörterbuch Geschichtsdidaktik. Schwalbach: Wochenschau, 2014.

MAYER, U. Handbuch Methoden im Geschichtsunterricht. Schwalbach:

Wochenschau, 2016.

MICHAELS, D. Doubt is their product: how industry’s assault on science threatens your health. London: Oxford University Press, 2008.

МИКЛИНА, Л. И. Социальная Память Современной Российцкой Молодежи. Власть, Москва, v. 23, n. 1, p. 136-140, 2015.

MIGNOLO, W. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore, v. 26, n. 7-8, p. 1-23, 2009.

MONIOT, H. Didactique de l’Histoire. Paris: Nathan, 1993.

MORENO-SÁNCHEZ, I.; FONT-CLOS, F.; CORRAL, Á. Large-Scale Analysis of Zipf’s Law in English Texts, PLoS ONE, San Francisco/Cambridge, v. 11, n. 1, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147073. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2019.

NORA, P. Les Lieux de Mémoire. Paris: Gallimard,1984-1992.

ORESKES, N.; CONWAY, E. M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010.

PANDEL, H.-J. Handbuch Medien im Geschichtsunterricht. Schwalbach:

Wochenschau, 2011.

PETERS, M. A. et alii. Post-Truth, Fake News, Viral Modernity & Higher Education. Cham: Springer, 2018.

PROCTOR, R.; SCHIEBINGER, L. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2008.

РАФИКОВ, А. М. Социальная Память И Механизмы Ее Воспроизводства. Вестник Башкирского университета, Уфа, [without volume], n. 2, 2006.

РАГОЗИНА, Т. Э. Культурная Память Versus Историческая Память. Наука. Искусство. Культура, Белгород , v. 3, n. 15, p. 12-21, 2017.

РЕБАНЕ, Я. К. Информация и социальная память: к проблеме социальной детерминации познания. Вопросы философии, Москва, [without volume], n. 8, 1982.

РЕБАНЕ, Я. К. Принцип социальной памяти. Тарту, 1984.

СИДОРОВА, Л. О. Концептуальные Подходы К Понятию Историческая Память. Вестник Мгуки, Москва, v. 4, n. 48, p. 81-86, 2012.

SILVA, E. A.; SILVA, J. M. Ofício, Engenho e Arte: Inspiração e Técnica na Análise de Dados Qualitativos. Revista Latino-americana de Geografia e Gênero, Ponta Grossa, v. 7, n. 1, p. 132-154, 2016.

The Public Historian. Vol. 1, 1978 – Vol. 39, 2017.

WILLIAMS, J. R.; BAGROW, J. P.; REAGAN, A. J.; ALAJAJIAN, S. E.; DANFORTH, C. M.; DODDS, P. S. Zipf’s law is a consequence of coherent language production. arXiv, Ithaca, https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07969v2, 2016.

ZIPF, G. K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley, 1949.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-10-11

Edição

Seção

Artigo