Against the "thin air of moral theory”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2016v15n2p246Abstract
The diagnosis was already given by Wittgenstein himself, as early as in the Tractatus, and more clearly so in the Philosophical Investigations: the urge to solve certain “philosophical problems” is but a symptom of a philosophical disease. We could indeed say that Wittgenstein’s main concern all along his work was to furnish an efficient philosophical treatment to cure the philosopher’s illusions and a method (or some methods) to establish a new philosophical attitude by means of a new philosophical activity. Both the diagnosis and the suggested treatment had an enormous impact on contemporary philosophical reflection, which I would like to consider here from the point of view of the so-called “moral philosophy”, the fate of which is an open question to be reflected on in this paper. In what follows I will begin with a brief characterization of the referred Wittgensteinian attitude as it applies to some authors: especially Anscombe, Gaita and Elliott; and to try to draw a picture of an anti-theoretical and anti-metaphysical moral-philosophical activity; this picture will then be completed with the authors shared criticism of traditional moral philosophy – as first and clearly stated by Anscombe; finally, I will try to delineate some of the alternative possibilities open to the future of “moral philosophy” against mere exegesis and against the old, pedantic – and always haunting – purely speculative attitude.
References
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy 33 (1958), pp. 1-19.
BOUVERESSE, J. Le philosophe chez les autophages. Les Étidions de Minuit, 1984.
CRARY, A. Does the Study of Literature Belong Within Moral Philosophy? Reflections on the light of Ryle’s Thought. Philosophical Investigations, vol. 23, n.4, pp.316-350, out 2000.
COETZEE, J.M. A Vida dos Animais. Trad. José Rubens Siqueira. Org. Amy Gutman. São Paulo: Cia das Letras, 2002.
CRISP, R. Reasons & the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
DIAMOND, C. “Anything but Argument?”, in The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy and the Mind. MIT Press, 1995.
ELLIOT, C. A Philosophical Disease: Bioethics, Culture, and Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.
ELLIOT, C. (Ed.). Slow Cures and Bad Philosophers: Essays on Wittgenstein, Medicine, and Bioethics. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
GAITA, R. A Common Humanity: Thinking about Love and Truth and Justice. Routledge, 2013.
GAITA, R. Good and Evil. An Absolute Conception. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2004.
GAITA, R. The Philosopher’s Dog. Routledge, 2005.
GIBSON, J. & Huemer, W. The Literary Wittgenstein. Routledge, 2004.
GIBSON, J. “Reading for Life”. In The Literary Wittgenstein. Gibson, J. & Huemer, W. (eds.). New York: Routledge, 2004, pp.109-124.
MURDOCH, I. A Soberania do Bem. Tradução Julián Fuks. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2013.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press, 1990.
SATTLER, J. ‘Alternativas à “Filosofia Moral Moderna”: Considerações Wittgensteinianas, Estoicas e Literárias’. In: Ética, Linguagem e Antropologia: Perspectivas Modernas e Contemporâneas. Carmo, J.S. & Santos, R. (org.). Porto Alegre: EdiPUCRS, 2012.
SATTLER, J. L’éthique du Tractatus: non-sens, stoïcisme et le sens de la vie. (Série Dissertio-Filosofia). Pelotas: NEPFIL online, 2014. http://nepfil.ufpel.edu.br/dissertatio/acervo-livro8.php
WITTGENSTEIN, L. “A Lecture on Ethics”. The Philosophical Review. Vol.74, No. 1, pp.03-12, (Jan, 1965).
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker & J. Schulte. 4th ed. Blackwell Publishing, 2009.
WITTGENSTEIN. L. Philosophical Occasions, 1912-1951. James Carl Klagge & Alfred Norman (eds.), Hackett Publishing, 1993.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. by C.K. Ogden. Routledge, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This obra is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional