Some Remarks On Woman’s Nature In The Family And Political Community According To Plato, Aristotle And Hegel

Authors

  • Marina Dos Santos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2018v17n2p159

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine, comparatively, women’s place within the political systems of Plato, Aristotle and Hegel from a brief sketch of their conceptions about human nature and feminine nature. It will be intended to indicate to what extent there is a relation, sometimes of tension, sometimes of complementarity, in the way descriptive and prescriptive elements function to circumscribe the space of women from the household private sphere, from Aristotelian and Hegelian perspectives, and how the subordination of descriptive elements to prescriptive elements allow woman to ascend in the public sphere under the Platonic perspective. After tracing this sketch, it will be suggested how this tension, in the political philosophy of Hegel, will result, in a way, in an explicit denial of women's political rights and, in another way, in the possibility of envisioning civil and political equality between men and women from an internal and inherent device of the Hegelian system, the notion of “second nature” as ethical reposition of the natural.

Author Biography

Marina Dos Santos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Master degree (2006) and PhD (2011) in Philosophy at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, focusing her studies in the philosophy of Aristotle and Ancient Philosophy. She is Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

References

ARENDT, H. A condição humana. Tradução de Roberto Raposo. Forense Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 10a edição, 2001.

ARISTOTE. L’Éthique à Nicomaque. Tradução, notas e comentários de R. Gauthier & J. Jolif. 2 tomos. Peeters, Leuven, 2002.

ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. [Edición trilingue por Valentín García Yebra]. Madrid, Gredos, 1998.

ARISTÓTELES. Política. Tradução para a língua portuguesa de António Campelo de Amaral e Carlos de Carvalho Gomes, Vega, Lisboa, 1998.

ARISTOTLE. De Anima. Tradução de R. D. Hicks, Prometheus Books, New York, 1991.

ARISTOTLE. “Generation of animals”. In: BARNES, J. (org.). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press, 1995, pp.1111-1218.

BEAUVOIR, S. Le Deuxième Sexe. (2 vol.) Gallimard, Paris, 1976.

DOS SANTOS, M. “Notas sobre a prova aristotélica do ato sobre a potência em Metafísica Theta 8”. In: STORCK, A. & ZILLIG, R. (Orgs). Aristóteles: Ensaios de Ética e Metafísica, Linus, Porto Alegre, 2011.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Enciclopédia das ciências filosóficas em epítome. 3 volumes. Tradução para a língua portuguesa de Artur Morão, Edições 70, Lisboa, 1989.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Principes de la philosophie du droit. Gallimard, Paris, 1989.

JAEGER, W. Paidéia: A formação do homem grego. Tradução de Artur Parreira. Martins Fontes, São Paulo, 2001.

KERVÉGAN, J. “Toute vraie philosophie est un idéalisme - L’esprit et ses ‘natures’ ”. In: MALER, H. (Org.). Hegel passé, Hegel à venir, Harmattan, Paris, 1995, pp. 11-28.

NEWMAN, W. L. The politics of Aristotle. 4 Vol., Ayer Company, New Hampshire, 1991.

NUSSBAUM, M. “Aristotle on human nature and the foundations of ethics”. In: ALTHAM, J. & HARRISON, R. (Orgs.). World, Mind, and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge, CUP, 1995, pp. 86-131.

PLATÃO. A República. Tradução para a língua portuguesa de Maria Helena da Rocha Pereira, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa, 1985.

WOOD, A. Hegel’s ethical thought. Cambridge, CUP, 1990.

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

Dossiers