Mill’s view about rights and the Rawls’ criticisms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2022.e87871

Keywords:

Justification of rights, Mill, Utilitarianism, Rawls

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to articulate an interpretation of Mill's theory about the foundation of rights that is capable of responding to Rawls' criticisms. First, the most general aspects of Mill's view of rights are presented. Then, the interpretation of the Millian thesis is articulated, taking into account Rawls' criticism that utilitarianism cannot justify rights. It is concluded that the Millian thesis is capable of attributing rights equally, that they have the reasonable moral force, and that the theory is capable of attributing legal rights based on a single principle.

Author Biography

Bruno Aislã Gonçalves Santos, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO/PR)

Mestre e Doutor pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Fez estágio doutoral na University of St. Andrews (Scotland) sob a supervisão do Professor Tim Mulgan com apoio do Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Atualmente ocupa a posição de Professor Colaborador na Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO) no Paraná.

References

BENTHAM, J. Anarchical Fallacies: A Critical Examination of the Declaration of Rights. In: HAYDEN, P. (ed). The Philosophy of Human Rights. Saint Paul (MN/EUA): Paragon House, 2001.

BERGER, F.R. Happiness, Justice and Freedom. The moral and political philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Los Angeles: University of Califórnia Press, 1984.

BONELLA, A. Utilitarismo e Ética. In: OLIVEIRA, N. F.; SOUZA, D. G. (orgs). Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2003.

BRANDT, R. Utilitarianism and rights. In: Morality, utilitarianism, and rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

BRINK, D. Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/mill-moral-political/>

CRISP, R. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. Londres: Routledge, 2006.

DWORKIN.R. Levando os direitos a sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.

GONTIJO, F. B. Por que interpretar a teoria ética de Mill como um tipo de utilitarismo de atos. In: ethic@, v. 20, n.1, p. 387-407, 2021.

KYMLICKA,W. Filosofia política contemporânea. Uma introdução. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.

LYONS, D. Utility as a possible ground of rights. In: Noûs, v.14, n°1, p. 17-28, 1980.

MILL, J.S. Sobre a liberdade/Utilitarismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.

NUSSBAUM, M. Mill entre Aristóteles e Bentham. FUNDAMENTO – Revista de Pesquisa em Filosofia, n. 4, jan–jun – 2012.

RAWLS, J. Uma Teoria da Justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

RAWLS, J. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy”. Editado por Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008a.

SUMNER, L.W. Mill’s theory of rights. In: The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.

URSOM, J. O. Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J.S.Mill. In: The Philosophical Quarterly, v.3. n.1, 1953. p. 33-39.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-04

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Dossiê A recepção de À Paz Perpétua / The reception of Toward Perpetual Peace

Section

Articles - Continuous Flow

License

 

Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.

Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.

Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.