Self-determination as oppression: freedom and spontaneous order in F. A. Hayek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2023.e94968Keywords:
Negative freedom, Freedom of the moderns, Liberalism, Friedrich Hayek, Benjamin Constant, Isaiah BerlinAbstract
The modern or negative conception of freedom is usually seen as one of the defining characteristics of the liberal tradition. In this paper, I intend to contrast Benjamin Constant's modern conception of freedom against Isaiah Berlin's and Friedrich Hayek's conceptions of negative freedom. I defend the thesis that not only is there no continuity between them, there is also a reversal on a crucial point: if for Constant modern freedom lacks civic participation in a self-determining community, for Hayek such a possibility of self-determination is the very source of the risk of oppression, so that there is no necessary or possible link between freedom and representative government. In doing so, I argue that Hayek offers two distinct conceptions of freedom, one negative (freedom as the absence of coercion) and one anti-positive (freedom as the absence of self-determination).
References
ANDERSON, Perry. “The pluralism of Isaiah Berlin”. Em: A Zone of engagement. Verso, 1992.
BERLIN, Isaiah. “Two concepts of liberty”. (p. 166-217). Em: Liberty. Oxford University Press, 2002.
CONSTANT, Benjamin. “De la liberté des anciens comparée à celle des modernes”. (p. 258-286). Em: Œuvres politiques. Libraires-éditeurs, 1874.
DE DIJN, Annelien. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
FERGUSON, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
HAYEK, Friedrich August von. Law, Legislation and Liberty. The University of Chicago Press, 2021.
HAYEK, Friedrich August von. The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press, 2011.
JACOBS, Struan. “Hayek, the ‘Spontaneous’ Order and the Social Objectives of Michael Polanyi”. Em: LESSON, Robert. Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Part IV: England, the Ordinal Revolution and the Road to Serfdom, 1931-1950” Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
PETSOULAS, Christina. Hayek’s Liberalism and its Origins. His idea of spontaneous order and the Scottish Enlightenment. Routledge, 2001.
SPENCER, Herbert. Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and publication rights over their works, without restrictions.
Upon submitting their work, authors grant ethic@ the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that proper credit is given to the authorship and to the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into additional contracts, separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (for example: deposit in an institutional repository, make it available on a personal website, publish translations, or include it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the initial publication in ethic@ are acknowledged.
