Disability discrimination in emergencies: The return of Taurek?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2023.e97052Palabras clave:
Healthcare Ethics, Prioritization, Respect, DisabilityResumen
John Taurek famously advocates an unpopular view in ethics: when deciding whom to rescue, the numbers don’t count. We should instead give everyone the same chance of surviving by choosing at random. Surprisingly little engagement has taken place between the detailed and rich literature on whether the numbers count in rescue cases, and the practical question of whether certain facts about patients are eligible for consideration in real-world prioritisation, e.g., in emergency triage during a pandemic. I suggest that a position close to Taurek’s maps on to real-world arguments by groups representing disabled individuals. Whereas Taurek is focused on equalising survival chances, some disability rights activists and scholars appear to argue in favour of equalising selection chances. I construct an argument in favour of this position by appealing to the idea of “opacity respect”. I then consider the implications of this approach for broader principles of affirmative action in healthcare.
Citas
ADAMS, Rachel. 2022. Urgent care: disability, pandemic, and the value of a life. The Lancet 399. 430-1.
AQUINO, Yves Saint James; ROGERS, Wendy A.; SCULLY, Jackie Leach; MAGRABI, Farah; CARTER, Stacy M. 2021. Ethical guidance for hard decisions: a critical review of early international COVID-19 ICU triage guidelines. Health Care Analysis.
de ARAUJO, Marcelo; AZEVEDO, Marco Antonio; BONELLA, Alcino E.; DALL’AGNOL, Darlei. 2023. Ethical guidelines for the allocation of scarce intensive care units during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Discussing a Brazilian proposal. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice: 1-10. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13924.
BOGNAR, Greg. 2020. Cost-effectiveness analysis and disability discrimination. In Cureton and Wasserman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability (OUP).
CARTER, Ian. 2011. Respect and the basis of equality. Ethics 121. 538-71.
CHEN, Bo; MCNAMARA, Donna Marie. 2020. Disability discrimination, medical rationing and COVID-19. Asian Bioethics Review 12. 511-8.
DAVIES, Ben. 2022. Healthcare priorities: The “young” and the “old”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32(2): 174-185.
FELT, Ashley Brooke; MITCHAM, Dionne; HATHCOCK, Morgan; SWIENTON, Raymond; HARRIS, Curtis. 2021. Discrimination and bias in state triage protocols toward populations with intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.
HELLMAN, Deborah; NICHOLSON, Kate M. Rationing and Disability: The Civil Rights and Wrongs of State Triage Protocols, 78 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1207 (2021).
KAMM, Frances. 1993. Morality, Mortality Volume 1: Death and Whom to Save from It. OUP.
LANG, Gerald; LAWLOR, Rob. 2016. Numbers scepticism, equal chances and pluralism: Taurek revisited. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 15. 298-315.
LIDDIARD, Kirsty. No date. Surviving ableism in Covid times. University of Sheffield: iHuman https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/ihuman/surviving-ableism-covid-times.
MCQUILLEN, Meghan; TERRY, Sharon F. 2020. Genetic and Disability Discrimination during Covid-19. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 24. 759-60.
MELLO, Michelle M.; PERSAD, Govind; WHITE, Douglas B. 2020. Respecting disability rights—toward improved crisis standards of care. New England Journal of Medicine 383. e26.
MEYER, Kirsten. 2006. How to be consistent without saving the greater number. Philosophy & Public Affairs 34(2): 136-146.
OTSUKA, Mike. 2000. Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one. Analysis 60. 288-93.
PANOCCHIA, Nicola; D’AMBROSIO, Viola; CORTI, Serafino; Lo PRESTI, Eluisa; BERTELLI, MarcO; SCATTONI, Maria Luisa; GHELMA, Filippo. 2021. COVID-19 pandemic, the scarcity of medical resources, community-centred medicine and discrimination against persons with disabilities. Journal of Medical Ethics 47. 362-6.
PETERSON, Martin. 2008. The moral importance of selecting people randomly. Bioethics 22. 321-7.
RASMUSSEN, Katharina Berndt. 2012. Should the probabilities count? Philosophical Studies 159. 205-18.
REID, Lynette. 2020. Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice. Journal of Medical Ethics 46. 526-530.
SAVULESCU, Julian; PERSSON, Ingmar; WILKINSON, Dominic. 2020. Utilitarianism and the pandemic. Bioethics 34. 620-32.
SCANLON, TM. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press.
SCULLY, Jackie Leach. 2020. Disability, disablism, and COVID-19 pandemic triage. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17. 601-5
STRAMONDO, Joseph. 2020. Disability, likelihood of survival, and inefficiency amidst a pandemic. Bioethics Today bioethicstoday.org/blog/disability-likelihood-of-survival-and-inefficiency-amidst-pandemic.
TATE, Alex Miller. Forthcoming. Rethinking the ethics of pandemic rationing. Egalitarianism and avoiding wrongs. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
TAUREK, John. 1977. Should the numbers count? Philosophy & Public Affairs 6. 293-316.
TOWN, Maria. (2020) AAPD letter, Covid-19 Response Package. Previously available at https://www.aapd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-19-Response-Package.pdf.
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
WARREN et al. (2020). Letter to Honorable Alex Azar, Seema Verma, and Roger Severino from Senator Elizabeth Warren et al., April 10 2020 Available to download at www.warren.senate.gov.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
![Licença Creative Commons](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png)
This obra is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional