Múltiplas representações e análise conceptual dinâmica em dados não controlados
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2021.e74461Resumo
A semântica cognitiva possui diferentes métodos de pesquisa, como introspecção, análise de corpora, análise de interações e experimentos. A análise de "dados produzidos em situações não-controladas" (corpora e interações) geralmente é baseada em teorias, mas raramente no cenário atual dos resultados de pesquisa experimental sobre linguagem e cognição. Este artigo tem dois objetivos, o primeiro é enfatizar a possibilidade e importância de diminuir a distância entre teoria, evidência empírica e análise de dados linguísticos no estudo da cognição. O segundo é sugerir que recorrer ao estado da arte de pesquisas empíricas sobre linguagem e cognição permite análises mais flexíveis, que podem superar os limites de teorias atuais. Para esse fim, (i) fornecemos uma visão geral atual de resultados de pesquisas neuro e psicolinguísticas sobre o “grounding” de conceitos concretos e abstratos, (ii) discutimos como esses resultados podem apoiar as análises de dados linguísticos e (iii) enfatizamos as tendências em direção a teorias de múltiplas representações e sistemas dinâmicos.
Referências
AMSEL, B. D.; URBACH, T. P.; KUTAS, M. Empirically grounding grounded cognition: The case of color. Neuroimage, v. 99, p. 149-157, 2014.
ANTONUCCI, S. M.; ALT, M. A lifespan perspective on semantic processing of concrete concepts: does a sensory/motor model have the potential to bridge the gap? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, v. 11, n. 4, p. 551-572, 2011.
BARROS-LOSCERTALES, A. et al. Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, v. 22, n. 11, p. 2554-2563, 2012.
BARSALOU, L. W. Challenges, and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition. Journal of Cognition (in press), 2020.
BARSALOU, L. W.; DUTRIAUX, L.; SCHEEPERS, C. Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 373, n. 1752, p. 20170144, 2018.
BARSALOU, L. W. On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1122-1142, 2016.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounding knowledge in the brain’s modal systems. In: UK COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS CONFERENCE. 4., 2012. p. 3.
BARSALOU, L. W. The human conceptual system. In: SPIVEY, M.; MCRAY, K. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p 239-258.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in cognitive science, v. 2, n. 4, p. 716-724, 2010.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., v. 59, p. 617-645, 2008.
BARSALOU, L. W.; WIEMER-HASTINGS, K. Situating abstract concepts. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, p. 129-163, 2005.
BARSALOU, L. W. Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, v. 22, n. 4, p. 637-660, 1999. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149. Access in: sept. 2020.
BEHUNIAK, S. M. The living dead? The construction of people with Alzheimer's disease as zombies. Ageing & Society, v. 31, n. 1, p. 70-92, 2011.
BERGEN, B. K. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning.New York: Basic Books (AZ), 2012.
BOLOGNESI, M.; BURGERS, C.; CASELLI, T. On abstraction: decoupling conceptual concreteness and categorical specificity. Cognitive Processing, p. 1-17, 2020.
BOLOGNESI, M.; STEEN, G. Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing, and Modeling. In: Perspectives on abstract concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 1-13, 2019.
BORGHI, A. M. et al. Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2018. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121. Access in: sept. 2020.
BORTFELD, H.; MCGLONE, M. S. The continuum of metaphor processing. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 16, n. 1-2, p. 75-86, 2001.
BUNDGAARD, P. F. The structure of our concepts: A critical assessment of Conceptual Metaphor Theory as a theory of concepts. Cognitive Semiotics, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2019.
BUNDGAARD, P. F. Are cross-domain mappings psychologically deep, but conceptually shallow? What is still left to test for conceptual metaphor theory. Cognitive Semiotics, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 400-407, 2013.
CIPORA, K. et al. A Minority pulls the sample mean: on the individual prevalence of robust group-level cognitive phenomena – the instance of the SNARC effect. PsyArXiv, 2019. Available in: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bwyr3. Access in: sept. 2020.
CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic structures, The Hague: Mouton, 1957.
CROFT, W.; CRUISE, D. A. Cognitive linguistics. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
CRUTCH, S. J.; WARRINGTON, E. K. Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, v. 128, n. 3, p. 615-627, 2005.
CUCCIO, V.; GALLESE, V. A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 373, n. 1752, p. 20170128, 2018.
DAVIS, C. P.; ALTMANN, G. T. M; YEE, E. Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, p. 1-12, 2020.
DEL PRADO MARTÍN, F. M; HAUK, O.; PULVERMÜLLER, F. Category specificity in the processing of color-related and form-related words: An ERP study. Neuroimage, v. 29, n. 1, p. 29-37, 2006.
DESAI, R. H.; REILLY, M.; VAN DAM, W. The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 373, n. 1752, p. 20170122, 2018.
DI PAOLO, E. A.; CUFFARI, E. C.; DE JAEGHER, H. Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Massachusetts: Mit Press, 2018.
FELDMAN, J. From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006.
FIGUEIREDO, N. M.; SIMAN, J H. Questões atuais sobre corpo e linguagem: cognição corporificada, agenda empírica e enativismo linguístico. Conjectura: filosofia e educação, v. 25, 2020 (forthcoming).
FLUSBERG, S. J.; MATLOCK, T.; THIBODEAU, P. H. War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2018.
FODOR, J. A. The language of thought. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1975.
FRAME INDEX. 2020. Disponível em: https://framenet2.icsi.berkeley.edu/fnReports/data/frameIndex.xml?frame=Sharing. Access in: sept. 2020.
GALETZKA, C. The story so far: how embodied cognition advances our understanding of meaning-making. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 8, p. 1315, 2017.
GALLESE, V.; LAKOFF, G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive neuropsychology 22, n. 3-4, p. 455-479, 2005.
GARCÍA, A. M. et al. How meaning unfolds in neural time: Embodied reactivations can precede multimodal semantic effects during language processing. NeuroImage, v. 197, p. 439-449, 2019.
GARCÍA, A. M.; IBÁÑEZ, A. A touch with words: dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, v. 68, p. 59-95, 2016.
GEORGE, D. R.; WHITEHOUSE, P. J. The war (on terror) on Alzheimer’s. Dementia, v. 13, n. 1, p. 120-130, 2014.
GIBBS JR, R.. Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive linguistics, v. 11, p. 347-358, 2001.
GIBBS JR, R. W. The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, v. 40, p. 45-52, 2013.
GIBBS JR, R. W. Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
GIBBS JR, R.. W. Metaphor as dynamical–ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol, v. 34, n. 1, p. 33-44, 2019.
GLENBERG, A. M. et al. Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, v. 61, n. 6, p. 905-919, 2008.
GOLDINGER, S. D. et al. The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 959-978, 2016.
GONZÁLEZ, J. et al. Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, v. 32, n. 2, p. 906-912, 2006.
GRADY, J. Foundations of Meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística), University of California, Berkeley, 1997.
HOLYOAK, K. J.; STAMENKOVIĆ, D. Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological bulletin, v. 144, n. 6, p. 641, 2018
IJZERMAN, H. et al. The Human Penguin Project: Climate, Social Integration, and Core Body Temperature. Collabra: Psychology, v.4, n.1, p. 37. 2018. Available in: http://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.165. Access in: sept. 2020.
KIEFER, M. et al. The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience, v. 28, n. 47, p. 12224-12230, 2008.
KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000.
KÖVECSES, Z.; PALMER, G. B.; DIRVEN, R. Language and emotion: The interplay of conceptualisation with physiology and culture. In: Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, Berlim: De Gruyter Mouton, 2003, p. 133-159.
KÖVECSES, Z. Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse, v., p. 19-33, 2019.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1980.
LAKOFF, G. How metaphor structures dreams: The theory of conceptual metaphor applied to dream analysis. Dreaming, v. 3, n. 2, p.77, 1992.
LAKOFF, G; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books, 1999.
LAKOFF, G. The neural theory of metaphor. In: GIBBS, R. W. (ed). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 17-38.
LANE, H. P.; MCLACHLAN, S.; PHILIP, J. The war against dementia: are we battle weary yet?. Age and ageing, v. 42, n. 3, p. 281-283, 2013.
LESHINSKAYA, A.; CARAMAZZA, A. For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic bulletin & review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 991-1001, 2016.
MAHON, B. Z. The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, v. 69, n. 2, p. 172, 2015.
MARTIN, A.; CHAO, L. L. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current opinion in neurobiology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 194-201, 2001.
MARTIN, A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol., v. 58, p. 25-45, 2007.
MARTINS, S. A Doença de Alzheimer e suas manifestações na linguagem: um estudo sobre a divulgação científica brasileira e norte-americana à luz da Linguística Cognitiva. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.
MCGLONE, M. S. What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?. Language & Communication, v. 27, n. 2, p. 109-126, 2007.
MITCHELL, M. Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford University Press, 2009.
NGATCHA-RIBERT, L. Alzheimer disease and society: an analysis of its social representation. Psychologie & neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement, v.2, n.1, p. 49-66, 2004.
ONNIS, L.; SPIVEY, M. J. Toward a new scientific visualization for the language sciences. Information, v. 3, n. 1, p. 124-150, 2012.
PAIVIO, A. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, 1986.
PECHER, D.; ZEELENBERG, R.; BARSALOU, L. W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 164-167, 2004.
PULVERMÜLLER, F. Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in neurobiology, v. 160, p. 1-44, 2018.
PULVERMÜLLER, F. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 17, n. 9, p. 458-470, 2013.
PULVERMÜLLER, F; FADIGA, L. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature reviews neuroscience, v. 11, n. 5, p. 351-360, 2010.
PULVERMÜLLER, F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature reviews neuroscience, v. 6, n. 7, p. 576-582, 2005.
ROTH, M. A. Representation, philosophical issues about. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, v. 1, n. 1, p. 32-39, 2010.
SAUCIUC, G-A.. The role of metaphor in the structuring of emotion concepts. Cognitive Semiotics, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 244-267, 2009.
SEMINO, E.; DEMJÉN, Z.; DEMMEN, J. An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, v. 39, n. 5, p. 625-645, 2016.
SIMAN, J. H. Os frames de Doença de Alzheimer. 2015. Dissertação (mestrado em Linguística) – Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2015.
SIMAN, J. H. Metáforas sobre doença de alzheimer: no pensamento e no mundo social. Revista do SETA, v. 9, p.1-19, 2019.
SPIVEY, M. The continuity of mind.Oxford Local: Oxford University Press, 2006.
STEEN, G. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2017.
THIBODEAU, P. H.; BORODITSKY, L. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS one, v. 6, n. 2, p.1-11, 2011.
TOMASELLO, R. et al. Brain connections of words, perceptions and actions: A neurobiological model of spatio-temporal semantic activation in the human cortex. Neuropsychologia, v. 98, p. 111-129, 2017.
VARELA, F. J.; THOMPSON, E.; ROSCH, E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2016.
VAN GORP, B.; VERCRUYSSE, T. Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: a framing analysis of media content. Social Science & Medicine, v.8, n. 74, p. 1274-1281, 2012.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Fórum Linguístico
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser de direito da Revista Fórum Linguístico, ficando sua reimpressão, total ou parcial, sujeita à autorização expressa da Comissão Editorial da revista. Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Esta publicação está regida por uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
