The Hiatus of Law within Law: Exclusion from Continued Benefit Payments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802011000100005Abstract
This article examines the process of “structural selectivity” from the conception of a basic constitutional right to the provision of social assistance related to Continued Benefit Payments (BPC), and the effectiveness of the management of this need and the determination of the eligibility for the benefits. To do so, it analyzes the evolution of the legislation that defines eligibility criteria and “denials” of the benefit for those requesting social assistance, a process marked by advances and setbacks in the application of the law. It also considers the effects of this evolution on social spending and trends in the contemporary debate in the realm of the policy field. In this movement, it highlights the decisive role of the courts in guaranteeing citizenship rights. Continued Payment Benefits. Social rights. Social assistance in the courts.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyrights for articles published in this journal are the author's, with first publication rights for the journal. Due to appearing in this Public Access Magazine, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational, professional and public management applications. The Magazine adopted the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This license allows you to copy, distribute and reproduce in any medium, as well as adapt, transform and create from this material, provided that for non-commercial purposes and that due credit is given to the authors and the source, a link to the Creative License is inserted. Commons and whether changes have been made. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or a book chapter).