Economia como Matching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n43p14Resumo
Recentemente, uma nova definição da economia apareceu onde o conceito de match ocupa um lugar central. Matching significa que existem algumas questões específicas relacionadas à associação efetiva de um determinado recurso a uma determinada pessoa. O match pode, portanto, parecer uma extensão da questão tradicional relacionada à distribuição da riqueza; contra essa aparência, o presente artigo enfatiza que algo mais está em jogo quando se trata de entender como o match é realmente implementado. A primeira parte do artigo é dedicada a explicar o que se entende por match no estado atual da economia, com ênfase especial nas obras de Alvin Roth. A segunda parte é sobre os fundamentos sociológicos da abordagem através do match em relação às questões econômicas, mostrando como ela é diferente do mercado. Finalmente, a terceira parte conecta a economia como match à compreensão de pastorado de Michel Foucault, focalizando as mudanças trazidas pela enorme quantidade de dados e a tecnologia necessária para implementar uma nova forma de governamentalidade, aquela em que, na esteira do antigo preceito religioso, requer que o líder governe a população como um todo e cada indivíduo em particular (“omnes et singulatim” nos termos de Foucault).
Referências
ABDULKADIROĞLU, A, 2013. School Choice. In:VULKAN, N.; ROTH, A. E.; NEEMAN, Z (ed.). Handbook of Market Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 138-169.
AGENCE DE LA BIOMÉDECINE,2013. Procédures d’application des règles de répartition et d’attribution des greffons prélevés sur personne décédée. Saint-Denis: Agence de la Biomédecine, 2013.
AGENCE DE LA BIOMEDECINE. Le rapport médical et scientifique du prélèvement et de la greffe en France – rein. Saint-Denis: Agence de la Biomédecine, 2014a.
AGENCE DE LA BIOMEDECINE.Rapport Annuel: Réseau, Epidémiologie, Information, Néphrologie. Saint-Denis : Agence de la Biomédecine, 2014b.
AGENCE DE LA BIOMÉDECINE. Du don à la greffe. L’attribution des greffons. Les journées de l’Agence de la Biomédecine 2015. Saint-Denis: Agence de la biomédecine, 2015.
BECKER, G. S. [1973]. A Theory of Marriage.In: BECKER, G. S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1978. p. 205-250.
CISION PRW.Results Of 2016 NRMP Main Residency Match Largest On Record As Match Continues To Grow.2016. Available at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/03/prweb13277506.htm Accessed on: aug. 11th 2019.
COLEMAN, J. S.Introducing Social Structure into Economic Analysis.American Economic Review, v. 74, n. 2, p. 84-88, 1984.
COLEMAN, J. S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard: The Belknap Press, 1990.
DESROSIÈRES, A. La politique des grands nombres. Une histoire de la raison statistique.Paris: La Découverte, 1993.
DUPREZ, J.-M.; BARBUT, M.Apprécier l’homogénéité dans la formation des paires. Similitudes et liens sociaux dans le choix du partenaire en aïkido.Revue française de sociologie, v. 48, n. 2, p. 333-367, 2007.
EVANS, D. S.; SCHMALENSEE, R.Matchmakers. The New economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2006.
FAUST, K.;WASSERMAN, S. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
FOUCAULT, M. Omnes et singulatim: vers une critique de la raison politique. In:FOUCAULT, M. Dits et écrits. Paris: Gallimard, 1981. p. 953-980.
FOUCAULT, M. [1981-1982]. L’herméneutique du sujet. Cours au Collège de France. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2001.
FOUCAULT, M. Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France, 1977-1978. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004a.
FOUCAULT, M. Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978-1979. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004b.
FRANÇOISE, F.; GUILLAUME, H.; IEHLE, V. Appariement: des modèles de Lloyd Shapley à la conception des marchés d’Alvin Roth. Revue d’économie politique, v. 123, n. 5, p. 663-696, 2013.
GALE, D.; SHAPLEY, L.College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage.The American Mathematical Monthly, v. 69, n. 1, p. 9-15, 1962.
Granovetter, M. Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Harvard University Press, 1974, 179 pp.
HAUTE AUTORITE DE LA SANTE. Transplantation rénale. Accès à la liste d’attente nationale. Méthode Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Saint-Denis: Haute Autorité de la Santé, 2015.
HAYEK, F.Law, Legislation and Liberty:The Mirage of Social Justice.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.
HEALY, K.Last Best Gift.Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organ. Chicago: Chicago university Press, 2006.
HILLER, V.; TERCIEUX, O.Choix d’école en France. Une évaluation de la procédure Affelnet.Revue économique, v. 65, n. 3, p. 619-656, 2014.
JACQUELINET, C.; AUDRY, B.; GOLBREICH, C.; ANTOINE, C.; REBIBOU, J.-M.; CLAQUIN, J.; LOTY, B.Changing Kidney Allocation Policy in France: the Value of Simulation.AMIA Symposium Proceeedings, p. 374-378, 2006.
JACQUELINET, C.?. Organ Sharing and Allocation Criteria. In:RICARD, R. (ed.). Transplant Coordination Manual. Barcelona: Donation and Transplant Institute, 2007. p. 28-42.
JACQUELINET, C.; AUDRY, B.; PESSIONE, F.; CORINNE, A.; LOTY, B.; CALMUS, Y. Règles d’attribution des greffons hépatiques.La presse médicale,v. 37, n. 12, p. 1782-1786, 2008.
JACQUELINET, C.; HOURMANT, M.Le nouveau score rein. Saint-Denis: Agence de la Biomédecine, 2015.
KARPIK, L. Valuing the Unique. The Economy of singularities. English translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
LORRAIN, F.; WHITE, H. C.Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, v. 1, p. 49-80, 1971.
MARSHALL, A. [1920]. Principles of Economics. Variorum edition. London: MacMillan, 1961.
MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K.Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live. Work and Think. London: John Murray, 2013.
MOGELL, S.; ROTH, A. E.Sorority Rush as a Two-Sided Matching Mechanism.American Economic Review, v. 81, n. 3, p. 441-464, 1991.
MORTENSEN, D. T.Matching: Finding a Partner for Life or Otherwise. American Journal of Sociology.Supplement, p. 215-240, 1988.
PARKER, G. G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M. W.; CHOUDARY, S. P. Platform Revolution. How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York: Norton, 2016.
PENTLAND, A.Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread. Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Books, 2013.
QUETELET, A. [1835].Sur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés ou essai de physique sociale. Paris: Fayard, 1991.
ROTH, A. E. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory.Journal of Political Economy, v. 92, n. 2, p. 991-1016, 1984.
ROTH, A. E. A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom.American Economic Review, v. 81, n. 3, p. 415-440, 1991.
ROTH, A. E. The economist as engineer: game theory, experimental economics and computation as tool for designing economics.Econometrica, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1341-1378, 2002.
ROTH, A. E.The origins, history, and design of the resident match.Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 289, n. 7, p. 909-912, 2003.
ROTH, A. E. Repugnance as a constraint on markets.Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 21, n. 3, p. 37-58, 2007.
ROTH, A. E. Deferred acceptance algorithms: history, practice and open questions.International Journal of Game Theory, v. 36, p. 537-569, 2008.
ROTH, A. E. What Have We Learned from Market Design?.In:VULKAN, N.; ROTH, A. E.; NEEMAN, Z (ed.). Handbook of Market Design. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2013. p. 1-50.
ROTH, A. E.; PERANSON, E. The Redesigning of the Matching Market for American Physicians. Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design”, American Economic Review, v. 89, n. 4, p. 748-780, 1999.
ROTH, A. E.; SAIDMAN, S.Increasing the Opportunity of Live Kidney Donation by Matching for Two-and Three-Way Exchanges.Transplantation, v. 81, n. 5, p. 773-782, 2006.
ROTH, A. E.; SÖNMEZ, T.; ÜNVER, U. M.Kidney Exchange.Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 119, n. 2, p. 457-488, 2004.
ROTH, A. E.; SÖNMEZ, T.; ÜNVER, U. M.A Kidney Exchange Clearinghouse in New England.AmericanEconomic Review, v. 95, n. 2, p. 376-380, 2005.
ROTH, A. E.; ROTH; VANDE VATE, J. H.Random Path to Stability in Two-Sided Matching.Econometrica, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1475-1480, 1990.
RYSMAN, M.The Economics of Two-Sided Markets.Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 23, n. 3, p. 125-143, 2009.
SMITH, A. [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and the Cause of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1981.
SÖNMEZ, T.; ÜNVER, U. M.Market Design for Kidney exchange.In: VULKAN, NIR, ROTH, A. E.; NEEMAN, Z. (ed.). Handbook of Market Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2013. p. 93-137.
STEINER, P. Foucault, Weber and the history of the economic subject. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,v. 15, n. 3, p. 503-527, 2008.
STEINER, P. Market or Gift-Giving. Economists and the performation of organ commerce.Journal of Cultural Economy, v. 3, n. 2, p. 243-249, 2010a.
STEINER, P. La transplantation d’organes: un commerce nouveau entre les êtres humains. Paris; Gallimard, 2019b.
STEINER, P. The creator, human conduct and the maximisation of utility in Gossen’s economic theory”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, v. 18, n. 3, p. 353-379, 2011.
STEINER, P.Altruísmo, dons e troca simbólica. São Carlos: Editora UNESP, 2016.
STOVEL, K.; FOUNTAIN, C. Matching. In:HEDSTRÖM, P.; BEARMAN, P. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2009. p. 365-390.
TERVEEN, L.; MCDONNALD, D. W.Social Matching: A Framework and Research Agenda.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, v. 12, n. 3, p. 401-434, 2005.
THALER, R. H.; SUNSTEIN, C. R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness,Yale, Yale university Press, 2008.
TIROLE, J.Economie du bien commun. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2016.
TURGOT, A.R. J.Réflexions sur la formation et la distribution des richesses.In:TURGOT, A. R. J. [1766]. Œuvres de Turgot et documents le concernant. Paris: Alcan, 1914. vol. II. p. 1-29.
WALRAS, L. [1900]. Eléments d’économie politique pure. Œuvres complètes de Léon Walras, vol. VIII. Paris:Economica, 1988.
WHITE, H. C. Identity and Control. A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton: Princeton university Press, 1992.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os artigos e demais trabalhos publicados em Política & Sociedade, periódico vinculado ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da UFSC, passam a ser propriedade da revista. Uma nova publicação do mesmo texto, de iniciativa de seu autor ou de terceiros, fica sujeita à expressa menção da precedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se a edição e data dessa publicação.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
