Modernity: A new axial (era) culture?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p20Abstract
The proposition of an axial age, lasting roughly from 800 to 200 B.C. and occurring in major civilizations (China, India, Near East) independent of each other, first introduced by Alfred Weber and Karl Jaspers, then further developed by Robert Bellah and S. N. Eisenstadt among others, implied from the outset the question whether there has been a second axial age, leading to modernity, and if so, whether this second axial age consists in a secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. In this article it is argued that the notion of a second axial age is meaningful, but that the emergence of modernity can›t be accounted for in terms of secularization of the achievements of the first axial age. Rather, a new axial principle was institutionalized which separates the modern from the premodern world. This new principle is spelled out with reference to Hans Blumenberg, Charles Taylor and especially Max Weber. The emphasis is on the dialectics of disenchantment and the place of religion in a secular ageDownloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and publishing rights to their works without restrictions.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors grant Revista Política & Sociedade the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work in this journal (for example, depositing it in an institutional repository, posting it on a personal website, publishing translations, or including it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the original publication in Revista Política & Sociedade are properly acknowledged.
