The problem of technological knowledge: a general epistemological characterization of biotechnology

Authors

  • Roberto López Mas Universidad de las Islas Baleares

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2018v24n3p551

Keywords:

Technological knowledge, applied science, prescriptive nature, tacitness, biotechnology

Abstract

The technology as applied science approach constituted, since the middle of the 20th century, the hegemonic view regarding the issue of technological knowledge. Although several alternatives to this more traditional proposal have been developed since the 1970s, the nature of the knowledge required to design and produce bioartefacts still has not been studied in sufficient depth. This article addresses the matter of technological knowledge with the aim of proposing a general epistemological characterization of biotechnology. The results show that biotechnological knowledge is formed by different types of knowledge that incorporate, on the one hand, prescriptive and, to some extent, tacit content and, on the other one, representational knowledge that is not necessarily provided by previous scientific research. The conclusion is that a characterization of the nature of biotechnological knowledge that exceeds the technology as applied science thesis is feasible by means of the analysis of the prescriptive knowledge from biotechnology that is not limited by a set of technological rules, its fundamental tacitness in contexts of design innovation, and the representational knowledge that may be generated in the process itself of creating bioartefacts.

Author Biography

Roberto López Mas, Universidad de las Islas Baleares

Universidad de las Islas Baleares, España

References

Bunge, M. 1966. Technology as applied science. Technology and culture 7(3): 329-47.

Bunge, M. 1969. La investigación científica: su estrategia y su filosofía. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Callaway, E. 2016. Dolly at 20: the inside story on the world's most famous sheep. Nature 534(7609): 604-08.

Campbell, K. H. S.; McWhir, J.; Ritchie, W. A.; Wilmut, I. 1996. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380(6569): 64-6.

Cuevas, A. 2000. Caracterización del conocimiento tecnológico y su desarrollo: hacia una epistemología de las ciencias ingenieriles (Tesis doctoral). UPV-EHU.

Cuevas, A. 2005. A model-based approach to technological theories. Techné: research in philosophy and technology 9(2). https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v9n2/cuevas-badallo.html

De Vries, M. J. 2003. The nature of technological knowledge: extending empirically informed studies into what engineers know. Techné: research in philosophy and technology 6(3). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v6n3/devries.html

Houdebine, L. 2003. Animal transgenesis and cloning. [Versión Adobe Acrobat Document]. doi:10.1002/0470867280

Houkes, W. 2009. The nature of technological knowledge. In: A. W. M. Meijers (ed.) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, pp.309-50. Ámsterdam: Elsevier.

Meijers, A. W. M.; De Vries, M. J. 2009. Technological knowledge. In: J. K. B. Olsen; S. A. Pedersen; V. F. Hendricks (eds.) A companion to philosophy of technology, pp.70-4. Singapur: Wiley-Blackwell.

National Research Council 2002. Animal biotechnology: science-based concerns. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Newell-McGloughlin, M.; Re, E. 2006. The evolution of biotechnology: from natufians to nanotechnology. Dordrecht: Springer.

Nightingale, P. 1998. A cognitive model of innovation. Research policy 27(7): 689-709.

Nightingale, P. 2009. Tacit knowledge and engineering design. In: A. W. M. Meijers (ed.) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, pp.351-74. Ámsterdam: Elsevier.

Norström, P. 2011. Technological know-how from rules of thumb. Techné: research in philosophy and technology 15(2): 96-109.

Pitt, J. C. 2011. Doing philosophy of technology. Essays in a pragmatist spirit. [Versión Adobe Acrobat Document]. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0820-4

Polanyi, M. 1965. The structure of consciousness. Brain 88(4): 799-810.

Polanyi, M. 1969. Knowing and being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Quintanilla, M. A. 2005. Tecnología: un enfoque filosófico. Y otros ensayos de filosofía de la tecnología. México: FCE.

Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. Londres: Hutchinson's University Library.

Scharff, R. C. 2009. Technology as Applied Science. In: J. K. B. Olsen; S. A. Pedersen; V. F. Hendricks (eds.) A companion to philosophy of technology, pp.160-4. Singapur: Wiley-Blackwell.

Smart, J. 1963. Philosophy and scientific realism. Londres: Routledge.

Vermaas, P.; Kroes, P.; Light, A.; Moore, S. (eds.). 2008. Philosophy and design. From engineering to architecture. [Versión Adobe Acrobat Document]. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0

Vermaas, P.; Kroes, P.; Van de Poel, I.; Franssen, M.; Houkes, W. 2011. A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. [Versión Adobe Acrobat Document]. doi:10.2200/S00321ED1V01Y201012ETS014

Vincenti, W. G. 1990. What engineers know and how they know it: analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Westhusin, M. E.; Long, C. R.; Shin, T.; Hill, J. R.; Looney, C. R.; Pryor, J. H.; Piedrahita, J. A. 2001. Cloning to reproduce desired genotypes. Theriogenology 55(1): 35-49.

Wilmut, I.; Beaujean, N.; De Sousa, P. A.; Dinnyes, A.; King, T. J.; Paterson, L. A.; ... Young, L. E. 2002. Somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature 419(6907): 583-7.

Wilmut, I.; Schnieke, A. E.; McWhir, J.; Kind, A. J.; Campbell, K. H. S. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385(6619): 810-3.

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles