On the metaphysics of (epistemological) logical anti-exceptionalism
A recent logical anti-exceptionalist trend proposes that logical theories are revisable in the same manner as scientific theories, either on grounds of the method of theory selection or on what counts as evidence for this revision. Given this approximation of logic and science, the present essay analyzes the commitments of both these varieties and argues that, as it currently stands, this kind of anti-exceptionalism is committed to scientific realism, that is, to realism about some unobservable entities evoked in logical theories. The essay argues that anti-exceptionalism cannot be separated into metaphysical and epistemological varieties, and proposed rather to label anti-exceptionalists views either broadly in terms of theory revision, or narrowly in terms of logic’s affinity with science.
Bonjour, L. and M. Devitt (2014). Is There a priori Knowledge?. In: M. Steup, J. Turri and E. Sosa, eds., Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chakravartty, Anjan (2017). Scientific Realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2017 Edition. Available online.
Douven, Igor (2017). Abduction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2017 Edition. Available online.
Hjortland, Ole Thomasen (2017). Anti-exceptionalism About Logic, Philosophical Studies, 174(3), pp 631–658. DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0701-8
Hjortland, Ole Thomasen and Ben Martin (2019). “Varieties of Anti-Exceptionalism”. Presented at the conference Anti-Exceptionalism and Pluralisms: from Logics to Mathematics, IUSS Pavia (Italy), April.
Hlobil, Ulf. Limits of Abductivism About Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. DOI 10.1111/phpr.12707
Maddy, Penelope (2002). A Naturalistic Look at Logic. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76(2), pp 61-90. DOI 10.2307/3218629
McSweeney, Michaela M. (2018). Logical Realism and the Metaphysics of Logic. Philosophy Compass, 14(1). DOI 10.1111/phc3.12563
Peregrin, Jaroslav (2018). “Logic as a (Natural) Science”. In: I. Sedlár and M. Blicha, eds., The Logica Yearbook 2018. London: College Publications. Available online.
Priest, G. (2006). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Priest, G. and N. Thomason (2007). 60% Proof: Lakatos, Proof, and Paraconsistency. Australasian Journal of Logic 5, pp 89-100.
Priest, Graham (2016). Logical Disputes and the a priori. Princı́pios 23(40), pp 29-57. Available online.
Read, Stephen (2018). Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic. Australasian Journal of Logic, 16(7), pp 298-318.
Resnik, Michael (2004). “Revising Logic”. In: G. Priest, J.C. Beall, J.C., and B. Armour-Garb, eds., The Law of Non-contradiction. Oxford: Clarendon.
Rodrigues, Cassiano T. (2011). The Method of Scientific Discovery in Peirce’s Philosophy: Deduction, Induction, and Abduction. Logica Universalis 5(127) 5, pp 127–164.
Rorty, Richard (1990). “Is Natural Science a Natural Kind?”. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Russell, Bruce (2017). A priori Justification and Knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2017 Edition. Available online.
Russell, Gillian (2014). Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic. Philosophical Studies, 171(1). DOI 0.1007/s11098-013-0255-y
Russell, Gillian (2018). Deviance and Vice: Strength as a Theoretical Virtue in the Epistemology of Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, forthcoming. DOI 10.1111/phpr.12498
Tajer, Diego. Kuhnian Anti-exceptionalism about Logic. Unpublished manuscript.
Williamson, Timothy (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI 10.1002/9780470696675
Williamson, Timothy (2017). “Semantic Paradoxes and Abductive Methodology”. In: B. Armour-Garb, ed, Reflections on the Liar. Oxford: Oxford UP. DOI 10.1093/oso/9780199896042.003.0013
Woods, Jack (2017). Logical Partisanhood. Philosophical Studies 176(5), pp 1203–1224. DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1054-2
Copyright (c) 2021 Evelyn Fernandes Erickson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.