Sexual Selection and the Brotherhood of Humans: Does the argument of The Descent of Man confirm The sacred cause thesis?

Santiago Ginnobili

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90604

Authors

Santiago Ginnobili CEFHIC, UNQ – CONICET – UBA , A RGENTINA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90604

Keywords:

Charles Darwin, Race, Sexual selection, Descent of Man, Adrian Desmond, James Moore

Abstract

Desmond and Moore point out that the key to understanding Darwin’s The Descent of Man is his abolitionist motivation and his advocacy that races constitute subspecies. Roberta Millstein raises some doubts about the importance of this motivation. She points out that the inclusion of the extensive section devoted to non-human animals is not justified by Darwin’s treatment of humans per se, because his explanation of the origin of races is peculiar. In this sense, she argues that Darwin’s specific explanation of the origin of races does not confirm the central importance that Desmond and Moore give to Darwin’s abolitionism. In this paper I have two different aims. On the one hand, to show that the human case actually is based on the treatment of nonhuman animals, and consequently, Darwin’s argument is not as poor as Millstein believes. My second goal, taking Millstein’s challenge seriously, is to show that Darwin’s explanation of the origin of races does confirm the Desmond and Moore thesis in a deeper sense than the one they propose themselves. For the anti-slavery motivation could not only explain the fact that Darwin sees all humans as forming the same species, but the specific explanation he gives for the origin of races.

References

Alter, S. G. 2007a. Race, Language, and Mental Evolution in Darwin’s Descent Of Man. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 43(3): 239-255.

Alter, S. G. 2007b. Separated at Birth: The Interlinked Origins of Darwin’s Unconscious Selection Concept and the Application of Sexual Selection to Race. Journal of the History of Biology 40(2): 231-258.

Beatty, J. 2006. Replaying Life’s Tape. The Journal of Philosophy 103(7): 336-362.

Borkovic, B. & Russell, A. 2014. Sexual selection according to Darwin: A response to Padian and Horner’s interpretation. Comptes Rendus Palevol 13(8): 701-707.

Blanco, D.; Ginnobili, S.; Lorenzano, P. 2019. La capacidad unificadora de las teorías científicas. Una propuesta alternativa desde el estructuralismo metateórico al enfoque kitchereano de patrones explicativos. Theoria 34(1): 111-131.

Caponi, G. 2020. El estatuto de las “razas humanas” en contextos monogenistas, poligenistas y evolucionistas (siglos XVIII y XIX). Revista Helius 3(1): 508-562.

Cronin, H. 1991. The Ant and the Peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crook, J. H. 1972. Sexual Selection, Dimorphism, and Social Organization in the Primates. In: B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual Selection and The Descent of Man - 1871-1971, p.231-281. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Darwin, C. R. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1872a. On the origin of species by means of natural selection (6th ed.). London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1872b. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1874. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1877a. The Various Contrivances by which Orchids are Fertilised by Insects. London: John Murray

Darwin, C. R. 1877b. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. R. 1882. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (2nd ed.). London: John Murray.

Dawkins, R. 2003. Light Will Be Throw - Foreword to a new Student Edition of Darwin’s Descent of Man. In A Devils’s Chaplain, p.63-77. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Desmond, A. & Moore, J. 2009. Darwin’s Sacred Cause - Race, Slavery and the Quest for Human Origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press:

Eiseley, L. 1972. The intellectual antecedents of The Descent of Man. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871-1971, p.1-16. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Gayon, J. 2010. Sexual Selection: Another Darwinian process. Comptes Rendus Biologie 333(2): 134-144.

Ginnobili, S. 2010. La teoría de la selección natural darwiniana. Theoria 25(1): 37-58.

Ginnobili, S. 2014. La inconmensurabilidad empírica entre la teoría de la selección natural darwiniana y el diseño inteligente de la teología natural. Theoria 29(3): 375-394.

Ginnobili, S. 2016. Missing concepts in natural selection theory reconstructions. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38(3): 1-33.

Ginnobili, S. 2022a. Darwinian Functional Biology. Theoria 37(2): 233-255.

Ginnobili, S. 2022b. El origen del rubor. Culturas Científicas 3(1): 20-43.

Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley / London: University of California Press.

Gould, S. J. 1982. Natural Selection and the Human Brain - Darwin vs. Wallace. In The Panda’s Thumb, p.47-58. New York: Norton & Company.

Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful Life. New York: Norton & Company.

Gould, S. J. 1996a. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Gould, S. J. 1996b. The Moral State of Tahiti-and of Darwin. In The Mismeasure of Man, p.413-424. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Kitcher, P. 1981. Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science 48(4): 507-531.

Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kottler, M. J. 1980. Darwin, Wallace, and the Origin of Sexual Dimorphism. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124(3): 203-226.

Kuhn, T. S. 1970. Postscript—1969. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), p.174-210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mayr, E. 1972. Sexual selection and natural selection. In B. C. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871-1971, p.87-104. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Millstein, R. L. 2012. Darwin’s explanation of races by means of sexual selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(3): 627-633.

Moore, J. & Desmond, A. 2004. Introduction. In The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, p.xi–lviii. New York: Penguin Books.

Padian, K. & Horner, J. R. 2014. Darwin’s sexual selection: Understanding his ideas in context. Comptes Rendus Palevol 13(8): 709-715.

Perez Sheldon, M. 2021. Sexual selection as race making. BJHS Themes 6: 9-23.

Richards, E. 2017. Darwin and the Making of Sexual Selection. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Ruse, M. 1975. Darwin’s debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6(2): 159-181.

Schwartz, J. S. 1984. Darwin, Wallace, and the “Descent of Man.” Journal of the History of Biology 17(2): 271-289.

Sommer, M. 2021. The meaning of absence: The primate tree that did not make it into Darwin’s The Descent of Man. BJHS Themes 6: 45-61.

Veuille, M. 2010. Darwin and sexual selection: one hundred years of misunderstanding. Comptes Rendus Biologie 333(2): 145-156.

Wallace, A. R. 1864. The Origin of Human Races and the Antiquity of Man Deduced From the Theory of “Natural Selection.” Anthropological Society of London 2: 158-186.

Wallace, A. R. 1869. Sir Charles Lyell on geological climates and the origin of species. Quarterly review (cxxvi): 359-394.

Wallace, A. R. 1889. Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of the Theory of Natural Selection with some of its Applications. London: Macmillan & Co.

White, C. 1799. An Account of The Gradation in Man and in Different Animals and Vegetables and from The Former to The Latter. London: Printed for C. Dilly.