The Presence of Physiology in Adam Smith's Theory: Organic Metaphor in the Roots of Economic Thought

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e95159

Keywords:

Adam Smith, Political Economy, Physiology, Animal Economy, Organic Metaphor

Abstract

This paper analyzes Adam Smith's ideas about physiology and how these ideas influenced and are present in his economic-political theory through the use of the organic metaphor. To do so, firstly, I will attempt to show that such a resource was not exceptional. However, great precursors and exponents of economic-political thought, such as Hobbes, Petty, or Quesnay, frequently used such metaphor. Secondly, I will show that Adam Smith's use of the organic metaphor reveals relevant aspects of his thought concerning both animal economy and political economy, as well as important metaphysical commitments. Finally, I conclude that the role of such a trope was not merely rhetorical and heuristic but an important means of reflection and inquiry.

 

Author Biography

Daniel Labrador-Montero, Universidad de Salamanca

Daniel Labrador Montero es Doctor en Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia. Actualmente, es Profesor Asociado en el Departamento de Filosofía, Lógica y Estética de la Facultad de Filosofía en la Universidad de Salamanca (España). BA en Filosofía y MA en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Su ámbito de investigación e interés académico es interdisciplinar, pero se ha centrado, especialmente, en Historia de la Ciencia, Filosofía de la Ciencia y Estudios de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad.

References

Balan, B. 1975. Premières recherches sur l’origine et la formation du concept d’économie animale. Revue d’histoire des sciences 28(4): 289–326.

Banzhaf, H.S. 2000. Productive Nature and the Net Product: Quesnay's Economies Animal and Political. History of Political Economy 32(3): 517-551.

Bassiri, N. 2013. The Brain and the Unconscious Soul in Eighteenth-Century Nervous Physiology: Robert Whytt's "Sensorium Commune". Journal of the History of Ideas 74(3): 425-448.

Black, M. 1966. Modelos y Metáforas. Madrid: Tecnos.

Bonnet, C. 1764. Contemplation de la nature. Tome 2. Amsterdam: Marc Michel-Rey.

Boyd, R. 1993 [1979]. Metaphor and theory change: What is "metaphor" a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, p.481-532. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bryan, J.D. 2020. Beyond Metaphor Corporeal Sociability and the Language of Commerce in Eighteenth-Century Britain and France. Contributions to the History of Concepts 15(2): 29-50.

Cantillon, R. 1755. Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. Londres: Fletcher Gyles.

Caponi, G. 2004. Georges Cuvier ¿un nombre olvidado en la historia de la fisiología?. Asclepio 56(1): 169-207.

Charleton, W. 1659. Oeconomia Animalis, Novis in Medicina Hypothesibus Superstructa, & Mechanice Explicata. London: R. Danielis and J. Redmanni.

Christensen, P.P. 1989. Hobbes and the Physiological Origins of Economic Science. History of Political Economy 21(4): 689-709.

Christensen, P.P. 1994. Fire, Motion, and Productivity: The Proto-Energetics of Nature and Economy in Francois Quesnay. In P. Mirowski (ed.), Natural Images in Economic Thought, p.249-288. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, I.B. 1994. An Analysis of Interactions between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. In I.B. Cohen (ed.), The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, p.1-99. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cullen, W. 1772. Institutions of Medicine. Part I, Physiology. Edinburgh.

Davidson, D. 1978. What Metaphors Mean. Critical Inquiry 5(1): 31-48.

De Baecque, A. 1997. The Body Politic: Corporeal Metaphor in Revolutionary France, 1770–1800. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

De Chambaud, M. 1765. Oeconomia animale. In D. Diderot; J. d'Alembert (ed.), Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, Vol.11, p.360–366. Vol. 11. Paris: Briasson.

D’Hombres, E. 2012. The ‘Division of Physiological Labour’: The Birth, Life and Death of a Concept. Journal of the History of Biology 45(1): 3–31.

Eriksen, C.B. 2017. Circulation of Blood and Money in Leviathan – Hobbes on the Economy of the Body. In J. Bek-Thomsen; C. Christiansen; S. Gaarsmand Jacobsen; M. Thorup (ed.), History of Economic Rationalities. Ethical Economy, p.31-41. Cham: Springer.

Fench, R.K. 1969. Robert Whytt, the Soul, and Medicine. Londres: The Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine.

Fetscher, I. 1979. Filosofía moral y política de J.J. Rousseau. Revista de estudios políticos (8): 7-32.

Fiori, S. 2001a. Visible and Invisible Order. The Theoretical Duality of Smith’s Political Economy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8(4): 429-448.

Fiori, S. 2001b. Ordine, mano invisible, mercato. Una rilettura de Adam Smith. Turín: Utet Librería.

Fiori, S. 2021. Machines, Bodies and Invisible Hands. Cham: Springer.

Foley, V. 1973. An Origin of the Tableau Oeconomique. History of Political Economy 5(2): 121-150.

Forget, E.L. 2003. Evocations of Sympathy: Sympathetic Imagery in Eighteenth- Century Social Theory and Physiology. History of Political Economy 35 (annual supplement): 282-308.

Franson, C. 2014. 'Nothing is so soon forgot as pain': Reading Agony in Adam Smith's “The Theory of Moral Sentiments”. In M.J. Coyer; D.E. Shuttleton (ed.), Scottish Medicine and Literary Culture, 1726-1832, p.23-47. Clio Medica Online, Vol. 94. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

García López, D.J. 2016. Fragmentos de la metáfora orgánica en el pensamiento político moderno. Pensamiento 72(272): 735-760.

Goldschmidt, V.E. 1983. Anthropologie et politique: les principes du système de Rousseau. París: Vrin.

Gruber, H. 1984. Darwin sobre el hombre. Un estudio psicológico de la creatividad científica. Madrid: Alianza.

Haraway, D.J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_ Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Harrison, P. 2011. Adam Smith and the History of the Invisible Hand. Journal of the History of Ideas 72(1): 29-49.

Harvey, W. 1936 [1628]. Del movimiento del corazón y de la sangre en los animales. México: UNAM.

Hesse, M. 1970. Models and Analogies in Sciences. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Hesse, M. 1988. The Cognitive Claims of Metaphor. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2(1): 1-16.

Hobbes, T. 1980 [1651]. Leviatán. Madrid: Grefol Editora Nacional.

Humboldt, A. von. 1827. Ensayo político sobre la Nueva España. Vol. 1. París: En casa de Jules Renouard.

Hume, D. 1987. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (1741-1777). Indianápolis: Liberty Fund.

Hume, D. 2004. Mi propia vida. México: UNAM.

Hutter, M. 1994. Organism as a metaphor in German economic thought. In P Mirowski (ed.), Natural Images in Economic Thought, p.289-321. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. 2011 [1790]. Crítica del Juicio. Madrid: Tecnos.

Kerr, C. E.; Milne, I.; Kaptchuk, T.J. 2008. William Cullen and a Missing Mind-Body Link in the Early History of Placebos. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101(2): 89-92.

Kreager, P. 2017. Adam Smith, the Division of Labor, and the Renewal of Population Heterogeneity. Population and Development Review 43(3): 513–539.

Lakoff, G.; Johnson, M. 1991. Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.

Lawrence, C. 1979. The Nervous System and Society in the Scottish Enlightenment. In B. Barnes; S. Shapin (ed.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, p.19-40. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Limoges, C. 1994. Milne-Edwards, Darwin, Durkheim and the Division of Labour: A Case Study in Reciprocal Conceptual Exchanges Between the Social and the Natural Sciences. In I.B. Cohen (ed.), The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, p.317-343. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Lomonaco, J. 2002. Adam Smith's "Letter to the Authors of the Edinburgh Review". Journal of the History of Ideas 63(4): 659-676.

López Lloret, J. 2021. Adam Smith y la hipótesis del desarrollo. Teorema XL(3): 101-119.

Luoma-aho, M. 2002. Body of Europe and Malignant Nationalism: A Pathology of the Balkans in European Security Discourse. Geopolitics 7(3):117-142.

Maasen, S.; Weingart, P. 1995. Metaphors—Messengers of Meaning: A Contribution to an Evolutionary Sociology of Science. Science Communication 17: 9–31.

Maasen, S.; Weingart, P. 2003. Metaphors and the Dinamic of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

Marcos, A. 1995. Biología, Realismo y Metáfora. Ágora. Papeles de filosofía 14(1): 77-97.

Marx, K. 1909. Capital. A critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co.

Masters, R. 1976. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Meek, R. L. 2003. The Economics of Physiocracy. Essays and Translations. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.

Milne-Edwards, H. 1827a. Nerfs. In Dictionnaire classique d’histoire naturelle, tome onzième, p.529-534. París: Rey et Gravier.

Milne-Edwards, H. 1827b. Organisation. In Dictionnaire classique d’histoire naturelle, tome douzième, p.332-34. París: Rey et Gravier.

Milne-Edwards, H. 1834. Histoire naturelle des crustacés. París: Roret.

Milne-Edwards, H. 1851. Introduction à la zoologie générale. París: Chez Victor Masson.

Mirowski, P. 1995. More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nokkala, E.P. 2009. The machine of state in Germany - The case of Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi (1717-1771). Contributions to the History of Concepts 5(1): 71–93.

O'Hagan, T. 2004. Taking Rousseau Seriously. History of Political Thought 25(1): 73-85.

Ortega y Gasset, J. 2010. España invertebrada. Madrid: Planeta DeAgostini.

Packham, C. 2012. Eighteenth-Century Vitalism - Bodies, Culture, Politics. Palgrave MacMillan.

Pearce, T. 2010. “A Great Complication of Circumstances” — Darwin and the Economy of Nature. Journal of the History of Biology (43): 493-528.

Petty, W. 1899 [1691]. The Political Anatomy of Ireland. In C.H. Hull (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, p.121-231. Vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pintor Ramos, A. 2007. El dualismo antropológico en Rousseau. Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía 34: 113-154.

Polo-Blanco, J. 2016. Economía y biología. La decisiva influencia del naturalismo en la construcción teórica de la Economía Política. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía (69): 93-108.

Quesnay, F. 1974 [1759]. El “Tableau economique” y otros escritos fisiócratas. Barcelona: Fontamara.

Rasmussen, D.C. 2018. El infiel y el profesor. David Hume y Adam Smith, la amistad que forjó el pensamiento moderno. Barcelona: Arpa.

Reynolds, A.S. 2018. The Third Lens Metaphor and the Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Rorty R. 1987. Unfamiliar Noises, Hesse and Davidson on Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volumes 61: 283-296.

Rousseau, J.J. 1985 [1755]. Discurso sobre la economía política. Madrid: Tecnos.

Russell, E.S. 1916. Form and Function. Londres: Murray.

Schweninger, L. 2016. A Return to Nature’s Order: Indigenous Peoples and the Politics of Alexander von Humboldt’s Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain. Elohi, 9: 87-102.

Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. Economic Doctrine and Method. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schweber, S.S. 1980. Darwin and the Political Economist: Divergence of Character. Journal of the History of Biology 13(2): 195-289.

Smith, A. 1987 [1776, 16 de junio]. Letter to David Hume. In E. Campbell Mossner; I. Simpson Ross (ed.), The Correspondence of Adam Smith, p.201-202. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

Smith, A. 1987 [1774, 20 de septiembre]. Letter to William Cullen. In E. Campbell Mossner; I. Simpson Ross (ed.), The Correspondence of Adam Smith, p.173-179. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

Smith, A. 1904. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Vol. 1. London: Edwin Cannan.

Smith, A. 2004 [1759]. La teoría de los sentimientos morales. Madrid: Alianza.

Smith, A. 2011 [1776]. La riqueza de las naciones. Madrid: Alianza.

Sontag, S. 2007 [1978]. La enfermedad y sus metáforas. Buenos Aires: Taurus.

Stafford, B.M. 1991. Body Criticism: Imaging the Unseen in Enlightenment Art and Medicine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Taka, T. 2011. Instinct as a Foundational Concept in Adam Smith’s Social Theory. The History of Economic Thought 53(2): 1-20.

Thoben, H. 1982. Mechanistic and Organistic Analogies in Economics Reconsidered. Kyklos 35(2): 292-306.

Turgot, A. R. J. 1898 [1769]. Reflections on the Formation and the Distribution of Riches. New York: The MacMillan Co.

Van der Weele, C. 1999. Images of Development: Environmental Causes in Ontogeny. Albany: SUNY Press.

Whytt, R. 1751. An Essay on the Vital and other Involuntary Motions of Animals. Edinburgh.

Wild, W. 2006. The Changing Voice of Illness in Eighteenth-Century British Consultation Letters and Literature. Clio Medica, Volume 79. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Wright, J.P. 1990. Metaphysics and physiology: Mind, body and the animal economy in eighteenth-century Scotland. In M.A. Stewart (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, p.251-302. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wright, J.P. 2017. Custom and Habit in Physiology and the Science of Human Nature in the British Enlightenment. Early Science and Medicine 22: 183-207.

Zirkle, C. 1941. Natural Selection Before de Origin of Species. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 84(1): 71-123.

Published

2024-12-11

Issue

Section

Articles