A Dilemma for Relational Quantum Mechanics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e97337

Keywords:

Relational Quantum Mechanics, Solipsism, Locality, Explanation

Abstract

Relational quantum mechanics (RQM) is an interesting alternative to the standard responses to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. But it suffers from a distinctive kind of epistemic solipsism: an observer can’t in principle know anything beyond their immediate present experience. This makes RQM self-undermining: it takes away the evidence we have for believing in quantum mechanics in the first place. Recently, Adlam and Rovelli have proposed a solution to this problem in the form of a new postulate they call cross-perspective links. Here I argue that this postulate does indeed solve the skeptical problem, but it also removes those aspects of RQM that make it distinctively relational. Nevertheless, the result of equipping RQM with cross-perspective links is an interesting interpretation in its own right.

References

Adlam, Emily. 2022a. Two roads to retrocausality. Synthese 200: 422.

Adlam, Emily. 2022b. Does science need intersubjectivity? The problem of confirmation in orthodox interpretations of quantum mechanics. Synthese 200: 522.

Adlam, Emily; Rovelli, Carlo. 2022. Information is physical: Cross-perspective links in relational quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Physics 1: 4.

Bell, John S. 1964. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200. Reprinted in Bell (2004), 14–21.

Bell, John S. 1975. The theory of local beables. CERN preprint. https://cds.cern.ch/record/980036/files/197508125.pdf. Reprinted in Bell (2004), 52–61.

Bell, John S. 1987. Are there quantum jumps?. In: C. W. Kilmister (ed.), Schrödinger: Centenary Celebration of a Polymath, p.41–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Bell (2004), 201–212.

Bell, John S. 2004. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Di Biagio, Andrea; Rovelli, Carlo. 2022. Relational quantum mechanics is about facts, not states: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner. Foundations of Physics 52: 62.

Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris; Rosen, Nathan. 1935. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 47: 777–780.

Friederich, Simon; Evans, Peter W. 2019. Retrocausality in quantum mechanics. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/qm-retrocausality/.

Kochen, Simon; Specker, E. P. 1967. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17: 59–87.

Laudisa, Federico; Rovelli, Carlo. 2021. Relational quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/qm-relational/.

Lewis, Peter J. 2016. Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin-Dussaud, Pierre; Rovelli, Carlo; Zalamea, Federico. 2019. The notion of locality in relational quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics 49: 96–106.

Pienaar, Jacques. 2021. A quintet of quandaries: Five no-go theorems for relational quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics 51: 97.

Price, Huw. 1994. A neglected route to realism about quantum mechanics. Mind 103: 303–36.

Price, Huw. 2012. Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says “Maybe”?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43: 75–83.

Price, Huw; Wharton, Ken. 2015. Disentangling the quantum world. Entropy 17: 7752–7767.

Rovelli, Carlo. 1996. Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35: 1637–1678.

Silberstein, Michael; Stuckey, William Mark; McDevitt, Timothy. 2018. Beyond the Dynamical Universe: Unifying Block Universe Physics and Time as Experienced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stacey, Blake C. 2022. The de-relationalizing of relational quantum mechanics. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.03230

Tumulka, Roderich. 2006. A relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber model. Journal of Statistical Physics 125: 821–840.

Wharton, K. B.; Argaman, N. 2020. Colloquium: Bell’s theorem and locally mediated reformulations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 92: 021002.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-18

Issue

Section

Special Issue: 13th Principia International Symposium