Experiences that tangent the (un) visible and mobility: ethnographies in dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n366982Abstract
The process of cross-referencing perspectives and analyzes of two researchers is the focus
of the discussion of this text. It discusses the requests issues during the ethnographic work, characterized by the long duration, both between the Dogon (in Mali) and between the Tsonga (in the south of Mozambique). New understandings emerge from experiences linked to madness, reproductive incapacity, migration and a set of endogenous knowledge dynamics in situations of crisis and individual and social suffering. In the analysis, the authors look for the movement of the imaginary and the creativity, assuming, in a complementary way, a reflexive re-reading as a way to fulfill epistemological crossings to the understanding of dense questions of sense and ambiguities that emerged in field studies. It became relevant for both researchers to use sensitive strategies for access to the imaginal world – drawing, photography and film construction –, inscribing expressive productions in anthropological interpretation as intercultural possibilities in the context of ethnographic work. Cultural and epistemic references generate contrasting perceptions, sometimes unintelligible, requiring the use of non-linear languages in terms of the notions related to the domains of non-visible and forms of elaboration of mobility in the midst of the shadows cast in intersubjective constructions.
Downloads
References
ABU-LUGHOD, Lila. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
ADICHIE, Chimamanda. “O perigo de uma única história”. TED, 07/10/2009. Disponível em https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Ihs241zeg.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. O que é o contemporâneo? e outros ensaios. Chapecó: Argos, 2009.
AUGÉ, Marc. Les guerres des rêves. Exercices d’ethno-fiction. Paris: Seuil, 1997.
BARROS, Denise Dias. Itinerários da loucura em territórios Dogon. Rio de Janeiro: EDFIOCRUZ, 2004. (Coleção Loucura & Civilização) Disponível em http://books.scielo.org/id/97dxr/pdf/barros-9788575413326.pdf.
BARROS, Denise Dias. “Liens ville-village et changements sociaux face à la migration saisonnière. Le mouvement de personnes entre Songho (Région Dogon) et Bamako, Mali”. Anthopos, n. 105, p. 471-488, 2010.
BARROS, Denise Dias; ABDALLA, Mustafa. “The Resonance of Travel in a Dogon Village. Pilgrimage Experience, Mobility and Social Change in Songho, Mali”. In: ABDALLA, Mustafa; BARROS, Denise Dias; BERTHET, Marina (Orgs.). Spaces in Movement. New Perspectives on Migration in African Settings. 1. ed. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2014. p. 57-78.
BARROS, Denise Dias; BAHI, Aghi; MORGADO, Paula. “Dogonicité et internet: une lecture critique de la substantivation des identités”. Anthropologie et Société, n. 35, p. 69-86, 2011.
BAYART, Jean-François. “Préface à la nouvelle édition: ‘Comme vous en Afrique’ ou l’hégémonie dans l’extraversion”. In: BAYART, Jean-François. L’État en Afrique. La politique du ventre. Paris: Fayard, 2006.
BATESON, Gregory. La Nouvelle Communication. Paris: Seuil, 1981.
BEWAJI, John Ayotunde Isola. Black Aesthetics: Beauty and Culture. New Jersey: Africa World Press, 2013.
BOURDIEU, Pierre; WACQUANT, Loïc. Pour une anthropologie réflexive. Paris: Seuil, 1992.
BOURRIAUD, Nicolas. Formas de vida: a arte moderna e a invenção de si. Tradução de Dorothée de Bruchard. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011a. (Coleção Todas as Artes)
BOURRIAUD, Nicolas. Radicante: por uma estética da globalização. Tradução de Dorothée de Bruchard. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011b. (Coleção Todas as Artes)
CANEVACCI, Massimo. Sincretika: explorações etnográficas sobre artes contemporâneas. São Paulo: Studio Nobel, 2013.
CARVALHO, Ruy Duarte de. Actas da Maianga …dizer das guerras, em Angola… Lisboa: Cotovia, 2003.
CLIFFORD, James. “Sobre a autoridade etnográfica”. In: CLIFFORD, James. A experiência etnográfica: antropologia e literatura no século XX. Rio de Janeiro: EDUFRJ, 1998. p. 17-62.
CLIFFORD, James; MARCUS, George E. (Orgs.). Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
COMAROFF, Jean; COMAROFF, John. “Etnografia e imaginação histórica”. Tradução de Iracema Dulley e Olívia Janequine. Revista Proa, v. 1, n. 2, 2010. Disponível em http://www.ifch.unicamp.br/proa. Acesso em 13/10/2018.
CRAPANZANO, Vincent. Imaginative horizons: an essay in literary-philosophical anthropology. Chicago e Londres: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
DEVISCH, René. Weaving the Threads of Life: The Khita Gyn-Eco-Logical Healing Cult Among the Yaka. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia do oprimido. 34. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2002.
GANDA Amaji – Rêves d´un jeune Dogon à Bamako. Direção: Gianni Puzzo, Denise Dias barros. Mali/Brasil. Anthares multimeios/Casa das Áfricas [mombo, francês], 70min, 2006. (Audiovisual vinculado a projeto de pesquisa de Denise Dias Barros).
GELL, Alfred. Art and Agency: an anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
HOUSEMAN, Michael; SEVERI, Carlo. Navenou le Donner à Voir. Essai d’Interprétation de l’Action Rituelle. Paris: CNRS-Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1994.
KLEIN, Renate Duelli. “How to do What we want to Do”. In: BOWLES, Gloria; KLEIN, Renate Duelli (Orgs.). Theories of Women Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.
MAFEJE, Archie. Anthropology in post-independence Africa: end of an era and the problem of selfredefinition. Kenya: Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2001.
MAFFESOLI, Michel. Elogio da razão sensível. Tradução de Albert Christophe Migueis Stuckenbruck. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1998.
MARCUS, George. Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University, 1998.
MARCUS, George. “O intercâmbio entre arte e antropologia: como a pesquisa de campo em artes cênicas pode informar a reinvenção da pesquisa de campo em antropologia”. Rev. Antropol., São Paulo, USP, v. 47, n. 1, p. 133-158, 2004. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ra/v47n1/a04v47n1.pdf.
MARCUS, George; FISCHER, Michael. Anthropology as a Cultural Critique: An experimental moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago & London: Chicago University Press, 1986.
MARIANO, Esmeralda. “Ser antropóloga entre local e global”. Revista de Antropologia, v. 60, n. 30, p. 65-88, 2017. (Dossiê: Olhares cruzados para a África: trânsitos e mediações)
MARIANO, Esmeralda. “The ‘Unsaying’ of Reproductive Affliction in Mozambique Witchcraft and Local Reproductive Knowledge”. The Oriental Anthropologist, v. 16, n. 2, p. 261-278, 2016.
MATEBENI, Zethu. “Perspectivas do Sul sobre relações de gênero e sexualidades: uma intervenção queer”. Revista de Antropologia, v. 60, n. 30, p. 26-44, 2017. (Dossiê: Olhares cruzados para a África: trânsitos e mediações)
MBEMBE, Achille. The “thing” and its double in Cameroonian cartoons”. In: BARBER, Karin (Org.). Readings in African Popular Culture. Oxford: James Currey, 1997. p. 151-163.
MBEMBE, Achille. Sortir de la grande nuit. Paris: La Découverte, 2010.
MORIN, Edgar. Método I: a natureza da natureza. Mira Sintra: Europa-América, 1987.
NEVES, Paulo Sérgio da Costa; MOUTINHO, Laura; SCHWARCZ, Lilia Katri Moritz. “Herança colonial confrontada: reflexões sobre África do Sul, Brasil e Estados Unidos”. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 27, n. 3, e66960, 2019.
NJOKU, Francis O. C. “The Originality of African Philosophy as a Hermeneutical Problem in Okere”. In: OGUEJIOFOR, Josephat Obi; ONAH, Godfrey Godfrey Igwebuike (Eds.). African Philosophy and the Hermeneutics of Culture. Essays in Honour of Theophilus Okere. Munster: Studies in African Philosophy, 2005. p. 93-111.
NORA, Pierre. “Présentation”. In: NORA, Pierre (Org.). Les Lieux de Mémoire, v. I. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1984.
NOOTER, Mary H. “Secrecy: African Art That Conceals and Reveals”. African Arts, v. 26, n. 1, p. 54-69, 1993.
NYAMNJOH, Francis B. “Delusions of development and the enrichment of witchcraft discourses in Cameroon”. In: MOORE, Henrietta L.; SANDERS, Todd (Orgs.). Magical interpretations, material realities: modernity, witchcraft, and the occult in postcolonial Africa. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. p. 97-117.
ROSALDO, Renato. “Grief and the headhunter’s rage”. In: BRUNER, Jerome (Org.). Text, play and story. Washington: American Ethological Society, 1984. p. 178-195.
SCHMIDT, Maria Luisa Sandoval. “Pesquisa participante: alteridade e comunidades interpretativas”. Psicol. USP, v. 17, n. 2, p. 11-41, 2006. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-65642006000200002&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt.
THORNTON, Robert. “The transmission of knowledge in South African Traditional Healing”. Africa, v. 79, n. 1, p. 17-34, 2009. Disponível em https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/africa/article/transmission-of-knowledge-in-south-african-traditional-healing/AB7496C545C21C7A2045083D7DFC359B.
TIRIBA, Thais Henriques; MOUTINHO, Laura. “Olhares compartilhados: (des)continuidades, interseccionalidade e desafios da relação Sul-Sul. Entrevista com Zethu Matebeni”. Revista de Antropologia, v. 60, n. 3, p. 181-185, 2017. (Dossiê Olhares cruzados para a África: trânsitos e mediações)
THIONG’O, Ngugi Wa. Decolonising the Mind: the politics of language in African literature. London: Heinemann, 1986.
WEST, Harry G. Kupilikula: o poder e o invisível em Mueda, Moçambique. Lisboa: ICS, 2009.
WEST, Harry G. “Governem-se vocês mesmos!”. Democracia e carnificina no Norte de Moçambique. Análise Social, v. XLIII (2º), p. 347-368, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Revista Estudos Feministas is under the Creative Commons International 4.0 Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The license allows:
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any support or format) and/or adapting (remixing, transforming, and creating from the material) for any purpose, even if commercial.
The licensor cannot revoke these rights provided the terms of the license are respected. The terms are the following:
Attribution – you should give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. This can be done in several ways without suggesting that the licensor has approved of the use.
Without additional restrictions – You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that prevent others from doing something allowed by the license.


