Convergences and dissonances between Luhmann and Bourdieu: the operational limits of anomie and autopoiesis

Authors

  • Stephan Treuke Postgraduate Program in Social Sciences, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador/BA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2178-4582.2017v51n1p34

Abstract

The present text consists in a reflection on the policy protection for children and youth performed by the Portuguese state. The locus of the research was the city of Évora – Alentejo/Portugal Region. It is a case study of qualitative nature, in which the investigation method used as instruments of collection the documental analysis and the semi-structured interview with seven subjects of the area of children and youth involved in the management of equipment aimed at prevention, care and accountability. The research is centered in an exploratory position since it tries to interpret the events starting from the social actors. Impartially understand this social environment. Thus, it is perceived an effort of many entities (governmental and non-governmental) to establish a prevention policy, monitoring and assistance to children and youth in Portuguese territory.  However, the data points to the economic difficulties that Portugal has faced reflect on the financing of the children and youth social protection policy.

Author Biography

Stephan Treuke, Postgraduate Program in Social Sciences, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador/BA

Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais, Universidade Federal da Bahia. Mestre em Geografia Humana e em Filologia Românica pela Justus-Liebig Universität, Alemanha.

References

BÜHL, W. L. Luhmanns Flucht in die Paradoxie. In: MERZ-BENZ, P.-U.; WAGNER, G. (Orgs.) Zur Kritik der systemtheoretischen Systemtheorie von Niklas Luhmann. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, 2000, p. 225-256.

BOURDIEU, P. Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis: auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1979, 493 p.

HARTARD, C. Differenz der Differenz. Luhmann und Bourdieu: Zwei Soziologen des Unterschieds. In: HARTARD, C. (Orgs.) Kunstautonomien. Luhmann und Bourdieu. München: Verlag Silke Schreiber, 2010, p. 1-69.

LUHMANN, N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1987, 675 p.

LUHMANN, N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1998, 1164 p.

NEVES, C. E. B.; NEVES, F. M. O que há de complexo no mundo complexo? Niklas Luhmann e a Teoria dos Sistemas Sociais. Sociologia, Porto Alegre, v. 8, n. 15, jan/jun 2006, p. 182-207.

PETERS, G. O social entre o céu e o inferno. A antropologia filosófica de Pierre Bourdieu. Tempo Social Revista de Sociologia da USP, São Paulo, v. 24, n. 1, 2012, p. 229-261.

PETERS, G. Habitus, reflexividade e neo-objetivisimo na teoria da prática de Pierre Bourdieu. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 28, n. 83, outubro 2013, p. 47-71.

RECKWITZ, A. Kulturtheorie, Systemtheorie und das sozialtheoretische Muster der Innen-Außen-Differenz. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Bielefeld, v. 26, n. 5, 1997, p. 317-336.

VANDENBERGHE, F. “O real é relacional”: uma análise epistemológica do estruturalismo gerativo de Pierre Bourdieu. Tradução de Gabriel Peters. Sociological Theory, v. 17, n. 1, 1999, p. 32-67.

Published

2017-11-16

Issue

Section

Artigos