Wh-constructions in Brazilian Portuguese: syntactic ‘doublets’ or stylistic variation

Authors

  • Mary Aizawa Kato UNICAMP

Keywords:

Wh-questions, Brazilian Portuguese, Syntactic “doublets”, Optionality, Diachrony, Wh-movement, Clefting

Abstract

This chapter contains my overview of diachronic and synchronic studies on Brazilian Portuguese wh-questions, and discusses the intriguing problem of apparent syntactic doublets, or optionality, in this domain. However, a careful examination of the diachronic order in which these patterns appear, and the variation exhibited in contemporary written and spoken corpora lead us to conclude that the co-occurring patterns do not constitute syntactic “doublets.”

References

ARONOFF, M. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 1. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1976.

BARBOSA, P. On Inversion in Wh-questions. In: HULK, A.; POLLOCK, J.-Y (Ed.) Romance Inversion. New York: Oxford, 2001, p. 2-59.

BELLETTI, A. Aspects of the low IP area. In: RIZZI, L. (Ed.) The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. New York: OUP, 2004, p. 16-51.

BRITTO, H. Syntactic codification of categorical and thetic judgments in Brazilian Portuguese. In: KATO, M. A.; NEGRÃO, E. V. (Ed.) Brazilian Portuguese and he Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt: Vervuert/Iberoamericana, 2000, p. 195-222.

CHENG, L.; J. ROORYCK, J. Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax, 3,1, p. 1-19, 2000.

DUARTE, M. E. L. A perda da ordem V(erbo) S(ujeito) no português do Brasil. DELTA. Número Especial. P. 37-52, 1992.

DUARTE, M. E. L; KATO, M. A. A Diachronic Analysis of Brazilian Portuguese Wh-Questions. Santa Barbara Portuguese Studies, v. VI, p. 326-339, 2002.

HORNSTEIN, N.; NUNES, J.; GROHMAN, K. K. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

HUANG, C. T. J. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. MIT: PH.D. Dissertation, 1982.

KATO, M. A. Inversão da ordem SV em interrogativas no português. DELTA.,3, 2, p. 243-252, 1987.

KATO, M. A. The distribution of null and pronominal objects in Brazilian Portuguese. In: ASHBY, W.; MITHUN, M.; PERISSINOTO, G.; RAPOSO, E. (Ed.) Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Currents Issues in Linguistic Theory Series), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993, p. 225-235.

KATO, M. A. Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. PROBUS, Berlin, Editora Mouton de Gruyter, 1999, p. 1-37.

KATO, M. A. The partial pro-drop nature and the restricted VS order in Brazilian Portuguese. In: KATO, M. A.; E.V. NEGRÃO, E. V. (Ed.) Brazilian Portuguese and the Null subject Parameter. Frankfurt: Vervuert/ Iberoamericana, 2000a, p. 223-258.

KATO, M. A. A restrição de mono-argumentalidade da ordem VS no português do Brasil. Fórum Lingüístico, Florianópolis, 2,1, p. 97-127, 2000b.

KATO, M. A. Free and dependent small clauses in Brazilian Portuguese. DELTA, 23 (Especial): Homenagem a Lucia Lobato, 85-111, 2007.

KATO, M. A. Deriving wh-in-situ through movement. In: CAMACHO-TABOADA, V.; GIMENEZ-FERNANCEZ, A.; MARTIN-GONZALES, J.; REYES-TEJEDOR, M. (Ed.) . 175-191. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2013a.

KATO, M. A. WH-movement in the history of Brazilian Portuguese. STIL, vol 5. 59-76, 2013b.

KATO, M. A. Focus and WH-questions in Brazilian Portuguese. In: DION, N.; LAPIERRE, A.; CACOULLOS, R. T. (Ed.). Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory. New York/London: Routledge, 2014, 111-130.

KATO, M. A. Morphological doublets in Brazilian Portuguese wh-constructions. In: REPETTI, L.; ORDOÑEZ, F. (Ed.) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Filadelfia. John Benjamins, 2018, p. 135-152.

KATO, M. A.; MIOTO, C. A multi-evidence study of European and Brazilian wh-questions. In: KEPSER, S.; REIS, M. (Ed.) Linguistic evidence: empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 2005, p. 307-328.

KATO, M. A.; RAPOSO, E. European and Brazilian word order: questions, focus and topic constructions. In: PARODI, C.; QUICOLI, A.C.; SALTARELLI, M.; ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. (Ed.) Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Washing ton: Georgetown U.Press, 1996, p. 267-277.

KATO, M. A.; RIBEIRO, I. Cleft sentences from Old Portuguese to Modern Brazilian Portuguese. In: DUFTER, A.; JACOB, D. (Ed.). Focus and Background in Romance Languages. Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John. Benjamins, 2009, p. 123-154.

KAYNE, R. The Antysymmetry of Syntax. Cabridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1994.

KAYNE, R. Pronouns and their antecedents. In: EPSTEIN, S.; SEELY, D. (Ed.) Derivation and explanations in in the Minimalist program. Malden, M A: Blackwell, 2001, p. 133-166.

KAYNE, R.; POLLOCK, J-Y. Stylistic Inversion, Successive Cyclicity and Move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9: 595-621, 1978.

KROCH, A. Morphosyntactic variation. In: BEALS, K. et al (Ed.) Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory, 1994, p. 180-201.

LOPES-ROSSI, M. A. 1996. A Sintaxe Diacrônica das Interrogativas-Q do Português. UNICAMP: Tese de doutorado, 1996.

KURODA, S-Y. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language, 9, p. 153-185, 1972.

MARTINS, A. M. 1994. Clíticos na História do Português. Universidade de Lisboa: Tese de Doutorado, 1994.

MIOTO, C.; FIGUEIREDO SILVA, M. C. Wh que = Wh é que? DELTA, 11, Vol 2, p. 301-311, 1995.

ORDOÑEZ, F.; OLARREA, A. Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish. Probus, v. 18.3. p. 59-97, 2006.

PILATI, E. Sobre a ordem verbo-sujeito no português brasileiro: 30 anos em mirada crítica. Revista Linguística, v. 12, n. 2. p.183-205, 2016.

RIZZI, L. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: HAEGEMAN, L. (Ed.) Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluver, 1997, p. 281-337.

URIAGEREKA, J. An F position in Western Romance. In: KISS, K. E. (Ed.) Discourse Configurational Languages, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 153-175.

VERGNAUD, J. R.; ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. The Representation of Focus and its Implications: towards an alternative account of some ‘intervention effects. In: BROEKHUIS, H.; CORVER, N.; HUYBREGTS, R.; KLEINHENZ, U.; KOSTER, J. (Ed.) Organizing Grammar- Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 641-60. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.

Published

2025-08-27