Influence of the characteristics of the board of directors in the informal assimetry of companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n39p24

Abstract

The present research had the objective of analyzing the influence of the characteristics of the board of directors in the informational asymmetry of companies. The methodology was descriptive, documentary and quantitative. The companies analyzed corresponded to the 100 listed in the IBRx100 index of B3 - Brazil, Exchange and Stock Exchange from 2012 to 2016. The data collection was done in the Thomson database and these were analyzed through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression - OLS. The results revealed the presence of information asymmetry between executives and investors, in which the decrease of such asymmetry was observed, due to the greater size of the board of directors and the independence of the members, besides the size of the company and its profitability. Thus, it was found that the monitoring control of the board of directors to carry out its responsibilities to the symmetry of information and decrease of agency costs needs to present certain characteristics, in which only its implementation does not guarantee this intention. The study has contributed to demonstrate that corporate governance mechanisms such as the board of directors, if projected with quality, can reduce agency problems, and can mitigate external users' concerns about asymmetric information and increase their confidence in the company.

Author Biographies

Alini da Silva

Doutoranda em Ciências Contábeis e Administração no PPGCC na Universidade Regional de Blumenau

Paulo Roberto da Cunha, Professor do PPGCC na Universidade Regional de Blumenau

Doutor em Ciências Contábeis e Administração no PPGCC na Universidade Regional de Blumenau

References

ANGLIN, P.; EDELSTEIN, R.; GAO, Y.; TSANG, D. How does corporate governance affect the quality of investor information? The curious case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Research, v. 33, n. 1, p.1-23, 2011.

ARMSTRONG, C. S.; GUAY, W. R.; WEBER, J. P. The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-234, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001

BEASLEY, M. S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, p. 443-465, 1996.

BEBCHUK, L. A.; WEISBACH, M. S. The state of corporate governance research. The Review of Financial Studies, v. 23, n. 3, p. 939-961, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121

BUSHMAN, R.; CHEN, Q.; ENGEL, E.; SMITH, A. Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 37, n. 2, p. 167-201, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005

CAI, J.; LIU, Y.; QIAN, Y. Information asymmetry and corporate governance. Drexel College of Business Research Paper, n. 2008-02, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139215500147

CHENG, S. Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 87, n. 1, p. 157-176, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006

COLES, J. L.; DANIEL, N. D.; NAVEEN, L. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, v. 87, n. 2, p. 329-356, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008

CORMIER, D.; LEDOUX, M.-J.; MAGNAN, M.; AERTS, W. Corporate governance and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, v. 10, n. 5, p. 574-589, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011085553

DOYLE, J. T.; GE, W.; MCVAY, S.. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, v. 82, n. 5, p. 1141-1170, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141

DUTRA, M. G. L.; SAITO, R. Conselhos de administração: análise de sua composição em um conjunto de companhias abertas brasileiras. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 6, n. 2, p. 9-27, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552002000200003

EISENHARDT, K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 1, p. 57-74, 1989. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

ELBADRY, A.; GOUNOPOULOS, D.; SKINNER, F. Governance quality and information asymmetry. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, v. 24, n. 2-3, p. 127-157, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12026

GILLAN, S. L. Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, v. 12, p. 381– 402, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.11.002

GOH, B. W.; LEE, J.; NG, J.; OW YONG, K. The effect of board independence on information asymmetry. European Accounting Review, v. 25, n. 1, p. 155-182, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.990477

GOODSTEIN, J.; GAUTAM, K.; BOEKER, W. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, v. 15, n. 3, p. 241-250, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305

HAN, S. H.; KIM, M.; LEE, D. H.; LEE, S. Information asymmetry, corporate governance, and shareholder wealth: Evidence from unfaithful disclosures of Korean listed firms. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, v. 43, n. 5, p. 690-720, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12064

HILL, C. WL; JONES, T. M. Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, v. 29, n. 2, p. 131-154, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x

HOFSTEDE, G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, v. 2, n. 1, p. 8, 2011. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

IBGC - Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. Os papéis do Conselho de Administração nas empresas listadas no Brasil, 2010.

JENSEN, M. C.; MECKLING, W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

JIANG, H.; HABIB, A.; HU, B. Ownership concentration, voluntary disclosures and information asymmetry in New Zealand. The British Accounting Review, v. 43, n. 1, p. 39-53, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.10.005

KANAGARETNAM, K.; LOBO, G. J.; WHALEN, D. J. Does good corporate governance reduce information asymmetry around quarterly earnings announcements?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, v. 26, n. 4, p. 497-522, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.003

LEUZ, C. IAS versus US GAAP: information asymmetry–based evidence from Germany's new market. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 41, n. 3, p. 445-472, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00112

MARQUES, L. Assimetria de informação e qualidade da auditoria independente. 126 f. (Dissertação de mestrado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Brasil, 2016.

MOURA, G. D.; BEUREN, I. M. Conselho de Administração das Empresas de Governança Corporativa Listadas na BM&Fbovespa: análise à luz da entropia da informação da atuação independente. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 13, n. 29, p. 11, 2011. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8077.2011v13n29p11

OLIVEIRA, M. C.; COSTA, P. P. O comitê de auditoria nas companhias abertas brasileiras: um estudo multicaso. Fortaleza, UNIFOR, 2004.

PAULO, E. Manipulação das informações contábeis: uma análise teórica e empírica sobre os modelos operacionais de detecção de gerenciamento de resultados. 269 f. Tese (Doutorado em Contabilidade) - Departamento de Contabilidade e Atuária da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007.

REZENDE, C. V.; ALMEIDA, N. S.; LEMES, S. Impacto das IFRS na assimetria de informação evidenciada no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 9, n. 24, p. 18-30, 2015. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v9i24.55524

ROTH, K.; O'DONNELL, S. Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, v. 39, n. 3, p. 678-703, 1996. https://doi.org/10.5465/256659

RUTHERFORD, M. A.; BUCHHOLTZ, A. K. Investigating the relationship between board characteristics and board information. Corporate Governance: An International Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 576-584, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00589.x

SHIVDASANI, A. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 167-198, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90009-5

WATRIN, C.; ULLMANN, R. Improving earnings quality: the effect of reporting incentives and accounting standards. Advances in Accounting, v. 28, n. 1, p. 179-188, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2012.03.001

XIE, B.; DAVIDSON, W. N.; DADALT, P. J. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, v. 9, n. 3, p. 295-316, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8

Published

2019-10-21

How to Cite

Silva, A. da, & Cunha, P. R. da. (2019). Influence of the characteristics of the board of directors in the informal assimetry of companies. Revista Contemporânea De Contabilidade, 16(39), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n39p24

Issue

Section

Articles