Sob o governo dos outros: dominação republicana e hierarquia social
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2023.e94141Schlagworte:
Liberdade, Republicanismo, Dominação, Subordinação socialAbstract
Der Artikel analysiert das neorepublikanische Konzept der Herrschaft als mögliche Antwort auf die Frage, was in Beziehungen, in denen wir unter der Macht anderer Menschen leben, moralisch verwerflich ist. Ziel der Analyse ist es, den Begriff der republikanischen Herrschaft, wie er von neorepublikanischen Freiheitstheorien (Skinner, Pettit und Lovett) konzipiert wird, mit dem zu vergleichen, was egalitäre Gerechtigkeitstheorien als das Problem der sozialen Unterordnung (Neuhouser, Kolodny und Anderson) bezeichnet haben. In dem Artikel wird versucht, die Vorteile hervorzuheben, die eine Betonung der ungerechten Formen sozialer Unterordnung für das Verständnis von Fällen bringen würde, in denen wir unter der Macht anderer Menschen leben. Schließlich wird argumentiert, dass egalitäre Gerechtigkeitstheorien die Vielfalt der Gründe anerkennen müssen, aus denen die freie Ausübung der persönlichen Handlungsfähigkeit wertvoll ist, während sie gleichzeitig restriktive eindimensionale Theorien der Freiheit vermeiden sollten.
Literaturhinweise
ALI, N. (2022) How Rich Should the 1% Be? Proportional Justice and Economic Inequality. Routledge.
ANDERSON, E. (2012) “Equality”, in: ESTLUND, D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
ANDERSON, E (2017) “The Problem of Equality from a Political Economy Perspective”. In: SOBEL, D.; VALLENTYNE, P. & WALL, S. (eds.) Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy (Volume 3). Oxford University Press, pp. 36 – 57.
BARROS, A. R. G. (2020) “La conception de la liberté comme non-domination de Philip Pettit”. In: Révolution Française: L’Esprit des Lumières et de la Révolution (22 de julho). Acessível em: https://revolution-francaise.net/2020/07/22/748-la-conception-de-liberte-comme-non-domination-de-phi lip-pettit
BARROSO, J. (2018) “Isaiah Berlin: Agonismo, Ceticismo e Liberdade”. In: SCANZERLA, A. et ali. (ed.) O Pensamento Político em Movimento: Ensaios de Filosofia Política. PUCPress.
BERLIN, I. (2002a) “Two Concepts of Liberty”. In: HARDY, H. (ed.) Liberty. Oxford University Press, pp. 166 – 217.
BIGNOTTO, N. (org.) (2013) Matrizes do Republicanismo. Editora UFMG.
CICHERCIA, L. (2022) “Structural Domination in the Labor Market”. In: European Journal of Political Theory 21 (1), pp. 4–24.
CARDOSO, S. (org.) (2008) Retorno ao Republicanismo. Editora UFMG/Humanitas.
CHRISTMAN, J. (2005) “Saving Positive Freedom”. In: Political Theory 33 (1), pp. 79-88.
COHEN, G. A. (1998) History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx. Oxford Clarendon Press.
COHEN, G. A. (1995) “Justice, Freedom and Market transaction”. In: Self-ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge University Press, pp. 38-66.
COLLINS, P. H. (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd edition). Routledge.
DU BOIS, W. E. B. (2018) [1903] The Souls of Black Folk, with “The Telented Tenth and “The Souls of White Folks”. Penguin Books.
DWORKIN, G. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
ELAZAR, Y & ROUSSELIÈRE, G. (ed.) Republicanism and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
FAREJOHN, J. (2001) “Pettit’s Republic”. In: The Monist 84 (1), pp. 77-97.
FRANKFURT, H. (1988) The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press.
FOUCAULT, M. (1990) [1978] “Qu’est-ce que la critique ?/Critique et Aufklärung”. In: Bulletin de La Société Française de Philosophie 84, pp. 35-63.
FOUCAULT, M. (1984) “Polemics, Politics and Problematization”. In: RABINOW, P. (ed.) The Foucault Reader. Pantheon Books, pp. 381 – 390.
GOUREVITCH, A. (2013) “Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work. In: Political Theory 41 (4), pp. 591-613.
HASLANGER, S. (2012) Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford University Press.
HOBBES, T. (1991) [1651] Leviathan. Ed. By Richard Tuck. Cambridge University Press.
KRAMER, M. (2003) The Quality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
KOLODNY, N. (2014) “Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy”. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (4), pp. 287-336.
KOLODNY, N. (2019) “Being under the Power of Others. In: ELAZAR, Y & ROUSSELIÈRE, G. (ed.) Republicanism and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 94 – 114.
LARMORE, C. (2001) “A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism”. In: Philosophical Issues 11, pp. 229 – 243.
LOVETT, F. (2012) “What Counts as Arbitrary Power?”. In: Journal of Political Power 5 (1), pp. 137-152.
MANNE, K. (2018) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford University Press.
MARKELL, P. (2008) “The Insufficiency of Non-Domination”, in: Political Theory 36 (1), pp. 9 – 36.
MAXWELL, L. (2019) “Democratic Dependency: A Feminist Critique of Nondomination as Independence”, in: ELAZAR, Y & ROUSSELIÈRE, G. (ed.) Republicanism and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 77 – 93.
NASCIMENTO, B. (2021) Uma História Feita por Mãos Negras. Zahar Editora.
NEUSHOUSER, F. (2013) “Rousseau’s Critique of Economic Inequality”. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (3), pp. 193-225.
NOZICK, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
PETRONI, L. (2021) “A Pobreza é Coercitiva?”. In: Novos Estudos Cebrap 40 (3), pp. 407 – 424. Acessível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/nec/a/yHCFjVMfbMvRcQWVMgP6PkQ/abstract/?lang=pt
PETRONI, L. (2022) “Igualdade como Não-Subordinação”. In: Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura Política.
PETTIT, P. (1997a) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
PETTIT, P. (1997b) “Republican Political Theory”. In: VINCENT, A. (ed.) Political Theory: Tradition and Diversity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 112 – 131.
PETTIT, P. (1999) “Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization”, in: SHAPIRO, I. & HÁCKER-CÓRDON, C. (ed.) Democracy’s Value. Cambridge University Press, pp. 163 – 190.
PETTIT, P. (2007) “Free Persons and Free Choices”, in: History of Political Thought 28 (4), pp. 709-718.
PETTIT, P. (2011) “The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin”. In: Ethics 121 (4), pp. 693-716.
PETTIT, P. (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
PETTIT, P. (2014) Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World. W. W. Norton.
PETTIT, P. & LOVETT, F. (2009) “Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program”. In: Annual Review of Political Science 12, pp. 11-29.
PETTIT, P. & MARTÍ, J. L. (2010) A Political Philosopher in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton University Press.
RAWLS, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
RAWLS, J. (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”. In: The Journal of Philosophy 77 (9), pp. 515-572.
RAWLS, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
ROBERTS, N. (2015) Freedom as Marronage. Chicago University Press.
ROUSSEAU, J-J. (2006) O Contrato Social (tradução Eduardo Brandão). Companhia das Letras.
ROUSSEAU, J-J. (2017) [1754] A Origem da Desigualdade entre os Homens (trad. Eduardo Brandão). Penguin & Companhia das Letras.
RYAN, A. (1999) “Isaiah Berlin: Political Theory and Liberal Culture”. In: Annual Review of Political Science 2, pp. 345 – 362.
SHAPIRO, I. (2012) “On Non-Domination”. In: University of Toronto Law Journal 62, pp. 293 – 335.
SHIFFRIN, S. V. (2000) “Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation”. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 (3), pp. 205 – 250.
SCOTT, J. (1989) “Everyday Forms of Resistance”. In: Copenhagen Papers 4, pp. 33-62.
SCOTT, J. (1992) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press.
STEINER, H. (1972) “Personal Liberty”. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75, pp. 33 – 50.
SKINNER, Q. (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
SKINNER, Q. (2002) “A Third Concept of Liberty”. In: Proceedings of the British Academy 117, pp. 237 – 268.
SKINNER, Q. (manuscrito) “Civil Liberties and Fundamental Rights: a Neo-Roman approach”. Manuscrito. Acessível em: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Civil-liberty-and-fundamental-rights-a-Neo-Roman-approach.pdf
SHAPIRO, I. (2012) “On Non-Domination”. In: University of Toronto Law Journal 62, pp. 293 – 335.
TAYLOR, C. (1985) “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?”, in: Philosophical Papers: Philosophy and Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 211 – 229.
THOMPSON, M. J. (2018) “The Two Faces of Domination in Republican Political Theory”. In: European Journal of Political Theory 17 (1), 44 – 64.
TILLY, C. (1999) Durable Inequality. University of California Press.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
This obra is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional
