Subpredication and small clause in simpler syntax: a case of non-uniformity at the interface

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2020v17nespp4726

Abstract

This research analyzes the semantic phenomena of subpredication based on Simpler Syntax (CULICOVER; JACKENDOFF, 2005). In their proposal, once semantics is generated in parallel, we have a presumption of non-uniformity as an option for theoretical economy: syntactic structures are maximally reduced, projecting only pronounced elements. We analyzed sentences containing verbs that select for subpredications and applied constituency tests in order to verify in which of these cases the verbs license an unique syntactic constituent as complement. Where we do attest the formation of such a constituent, the subpredication is syntactically projected as a small clause (SC); in all other cases, predication relations are set up directly with the verb, and no SC is formed – for this group of verbs, the syntactic representation is similar to that of double object verbs. Our results revealed that many verbs traditionally considered to select SCs, in fact, don’t do so, even though they establish a subpredication relation on the semantic level.

 

Author Biographies

Rafaela Miliorini, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-graduação e Linguística da UFSC

Heronides Moura, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Professor Titular do Departamento de Língua e Literatura Vernáculas e do Programa de Pós-graduação e Linguística da UFSC

References

AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975 [1962].

BURZIO, L. Italian syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1986.

CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. Epistemic small clauses and null subjects. In.: WESTPHAL, G.; AO, B.; CHAE, H.-R. (org.). Proceedings of VII Eastern States Conference of Linguistics, Ohio State University Press: Columbus, 1992. p. 23-33.

CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. Small clauses: some controversies and issues of acquisition. In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995, p. 1-23.

CARNIE, A. Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 2. ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

CHOMSKY, N. A Minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J. (org.). The View from Building 20. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. p. 195-227.

CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965.

CHOMSKY, N. Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.

CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.

CHOMSKY, N. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: MARTIN, R.; MICHAELS, D.; URIAGEREKA, J. (org.). Step by Step: essays in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. p. 89-155.

CHOMSKY, N. Some notes on the economy of derivation and representation. In: FREIDIN, R. (org.). Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. p. 417-454.

CHOMSKY, N. Studies on semantics in generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.

CHOMSKY, N. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.

CHOMSKY, N.; BELLETTI, A.; RIZZI, L. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon, 1975.

CINQUE, G. The pseudo-relative and ACC-ing constructions after verbs of perception. University of Venice, 1991.

CONTRERAS, H. Small clauses and complex predicates. In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. p. 135-152.

CULICOVER, P. Concrete minimalism, branching structure, and linear order. Proceedings of GLiP-2 (Generative Linguistics in Poland). Warsaw, 2000.

CULICOVER, P; JACKENDOFF, R. Simpler Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

FOLTRAN, M. J. As construções de predicação secundária no português do Brasil: aspectos sintáticos e semânticos. 1999. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1999.

FOLTRAN, M. J. Predicados secundários: restrições semânticas. Revista Letras, Curitiba, n. 58, p. 211-223, jul./dez. 2002.

GOMES, A. F. R.; FOLTRAN, M. J. Small clause complemento: caracterização e seleção. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 17, n. 2, p. 51-71. jul./dez., 2009.

GUÉRON, J.; HOEKSTRA, T. The temporal interpretation of predication. In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. p. 77-107.

HAEGEMAN, L. Introduction to government and binding theory. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1994.

HAEGEMAN, L. Thinking syntactically: a guide to argumentation and analysis. Cornwell: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.

JACKENDOFF, R. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

JACKENDOFF, R. Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.

KATO, M.; MIOTO, C. A arquitetura da gramática. In: KATO, M.; NASCIMENTO, M. do. (org.). Gramática do português culto falado no Brasil, vol 2: a construção da sentença. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015. p. 19-35.

LASNIK, H; DEPIANTE, M.; STEPANOV, A. Syntactic structures revisited: contemporary lectures on classic transformational theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

MILIORINI, R. As representações sintáticas da subpredicação em PB: a não-uniformidade entre forma e sentido. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2016.

MILIORINI, R. O que cortar com a navalha: economia na Gramática Gerativa e na Sintaxe mais Simples. Revista do GELNE, Natal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 57-73, 2018.

MIOTO, C.; FIGUEIREDO SILVA, M. C.; LOPES, R. Novo manual de sintaxe. 3. ed. Florianópolis: Insular, 2007.

MIOTO, C.; FIGUEIREDO SILVA, M. C.; LOPES, R. Novo manual de sintaxe. São Paulo: Contexto, 2013.

MIOTO, C.; FOLTRAN, M. J. A favor de small clauses. Caderno de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, v. 49, n. 1, p. 11-28, 2007.

MORTARI, C. A. Introdução à lógica. São Paulo: Editora da Unesp, 2001.

MOURA, H. A linguagem não é transparente. Um estudo sobre a relação entre forma e sentido. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC, 2018.

PERLMUTTER, D. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1978. p. 157-190.

PROGOVAC, L. Evolutionary Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

PROGOVAC, L. The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In: PROGOVAC, L. et al. The syntax of nonsententials: multidisciplinary perspectives. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006. p. 33-71.

RADFORD, A. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.

RADFORD, A. Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

RAPOSO, E; URIAGEREKA, J. Long distance case assignment. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 21, p. 505-537, 1990.

RAPOSO, E; URIAGEREKA, J. Two types of small clauses (toward a syntax of theme/rheme relations). In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. p. 179-206.

RODRIGUES, P. A. O status de small clauses das construções gerundivas e adjetivais complementos de verbos de percepção com interpretação imaginativa. In: ENCONTRO CELSUL – Círculo de Estudos Linguísticos do Sul, 6., Florianópolis, 2001. Anais... Florianópolis: UFSC, 2004.

ROTHSTEIN, S. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

ROTHSTEIN, S. Small clauses and copular constructions. In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. p. 27-48.

SEARLE, J. Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

SEARLE, J. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

STOWELL, T. Remarks on clause structure. In: CARDINALETTI, A.; GUASTI, M. T. (org.). Syntax and semantics: small clauses (vol) 28. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. p. 271-286.

STOWELL, T. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2. p. 285-312, 1983.

VARASCHIN, G. Uma análise cognitiva da conjunção proposicional: revisando a paradigma griceano. 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2017.

WILLIAMS, E. Against small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 14, n. 2, p. 287-308, 1983

WILLIAMS, E. Small clauses in English. In: KIMBALL, J. (org.). Syntax and semantics. (vol) 4. Orlando: Academic Press, 1975. p. 249-273.

Published

2020-06-23