Metodología en investigación lingüítica: una vela entre Escilla y Caribdis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2022.e84043Palabras clave:
significado do trabalho, agroindustria, trabalho e gêneroResumen
diferencia de la mayoría de las teorías lingüísticas, la lingüística integradora no incluye una metodología para la investigación lingüística. Los integracionistas son críticos con las metodologías y supuestos de la lingüística moderna y encuentran muy problemática la noción de datos lingüísticos. Por esto, los integracionistas han recibido mucha atención de los investigadores de tradiciones de investigación impulsadas por datos que piden una alternativa metodológica y encuentran frustrante la falta de investigación empírica integradora. En este ensayo, considero algunos de los antecedentes de la crítica integracionista de las metodologías lingüísticas y discuto cómo abordar las dificultades relacionadas con los datos lingüísticos. Concluyo con un ejemplo empírico para ilustrar los problemas y su posible solución.
Citas
AGHA, A. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
ANTAKI, C.; BILLIG, M.; EDWARDS, D.; POTTER, J. Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, v.1, n. 1, p. 1-39, 2003. Available in: https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002.html. Acess in: jan. 2022.
ASHMORE, M.; MACMILLAN, K.; BROWN, S. D. It’s a scream: professional hearing and tape fetishism. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 36, p. 349-374, 2004.
BENNE, C. Rephilologisation: Toward the Integration of Linguistics and Literary Scholarship. In: DUNCKER, D.; PERREGAARD, B. (ed.). Creativity and Continuity. Perspectives on the Dynamics of Language Conventionalisation. Copenhagen: U Press, 2017. p. 41-56.
BUCHOLTZ, M. The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 32, p. 1439-1465, 2000.
BUCHOLTZ, M. Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, v. 9, n. 6, p. 784-808, 2007.
BUNGE, M. Epistemology & methodology I : Exploring the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983.
D'ARCY, A. Advances in sociolinguistic transcription methods. In: MALLINSON, C.; CHILDS, B.; HERK, G. V. (ed.). Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications. New York and London: Routledge, 2013. p. 187-190.
DUNCKER, D. The Reflexivity of Language and Linguistic Inquiry: Integrational Linguistics in Practice. London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
FIRTH, J. R. The semantics of linguistic science. In: J. R. FIRTH (ed.). Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press, [1948]1964. p. 139-147.
GREGERSEN, F.; PEDERSEN, I. L. (ed.). The Copenhagen Study in Urban Sociolinguistics. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels forlag, 1991.
HARRIS, R. The Language Myth. London: Duckworth, 1981.
HARRIS, R. Signs, Language and Communication. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
HARRIS, R. From an integrational point of view. In: WOLF, G.; LOVE, N. (ed.). Linguistics Inside Out. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1997. p. 229-310.
HARRIS, R. Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 1998.
HARRIS, R. After Epistemology. Gamlingay: Bright Pen, 2009a.
HARRIS, R. The integrational conception of the sign. In: HARRIS, R. Integrationist Notes and Papers 2006-2008. Gamlingay: Bright Pen, 2009b. p. 61-82.
HARRIS, R. What a linguistic fact is not. In: HARRIS, R. Integrationist Notes and Papers 2006-2008. Gamlingay: Bright Pen, 2009c. p. 39-46.
HARRIS, R.; HUTTON, C. Definition in Theory and Practice. Language, Lexicography and the Law. London, New York: Continuum, 2007.
HEPBURN, B.; ANDERSEN, H. Scientific Method. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer ed.), 2021. Available in: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/scientific-method/. Acess in: jan. 2022.
HUTTON, C. The impossible dream? Reflections on the intellectual journey of Roy Harris (1931−2015). Language & History, v. 59, n. 1, 79-84, 2016.
JOHNSTONE, B. Reflexivity in sociolinguistics. In: BROWN, K. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. 2nd. ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. p. 463-464.
JOSEPH, J. E., LOVE, N., & TAYLOR, T. J. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought II: The Western Tradition in the 20th Century. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.
LABOV, W. What is a Linguistic Fact? Lisse: Peter de Ridder, 1975.
LABOV, W. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. 2nd. ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
LABOV, W. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991 [1972].
LOVE, N. The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics. In: DAVIS, H. G.; TAYLOR, T. J. (ed.). Redefining Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, 1990. p. 53-117.
LOVE, N. The language myth and historical linguistics. In: HARRIS, R. (ed.). The Language Myth in Western Culture. Richmond: Curzon Press, 2002. p. 25-40.
LOVE, N. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, v. 29, n. 5, p. 690-709, 2007.
MARTINET, A. Double Articulation as a Criterion of Linguisticity. Language Sciences, v. 6, n. 1, p. 31-38, 1984.
MEYRICK, J. What is Good Qualitative Research? Journal of Health Psychology, v. 11, n. 5, p. 799-808, 2006.
NAGEL, T. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
NIEDZIELSKI, N. A.; PRESTON, D. R. Folk Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1999.
OCHS, E. Transcription as theory. In: OCHS, E.; SCHIEFFLEN, B. (ed.). Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1979. p. 43-72.
ORMAN, J.; PABLÉ, A. Polylanguaging, integrational linguistics and contemporary sociolinguistic theory: a commentary on Ritzau. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 19, n. 5, p. 592-602, 2016.
PABLÉ, A.; HUTTON, C. Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2015.
PRESTON, D. R. Folk metalanguage. In: JAWORSKI, A; COUPLAND, N.; GALASIŃSKI, D. (ed.). Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004. p. 75-101.
RITZAU, U. Learner language and polylanguaging: how language students' ideologies relate to their written language use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, p. 1-16, 2014. Avalible in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13670050.2014.936822?journalCode=rbeb20. Acess in: jan. 2022.
SILVERSTEIN, M. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In: LUCY, J. A. (ed.). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. p. 33-58.
TAYLOR, T. J. Language constructing language: The implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory. Language Sciences, v. 22, n. 4, p. 483-499, 2000.
TEN HAVE, P. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2007.
WOLF, G.; LOVE, N. (ed.). Linguistics Inside Out. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997.
WRAY, A.; BLOOMER, A. Projects in Linguistics and Language Studies. A Practical Guide to Researching Language. 3rd. ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los trabajos publicados pasan a ser de derecho de la Revista Fórum Linguístico, quedando su reimpresión, total o parcial, sujeta a la autorización expresa del Consejo de Redacción de la revista. Debe ser consignada la fuente de publicación original.
