Algorithmic platforms and economics of disinformation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-6924.2021.e77485

Abstract

This article of theoretical reflection, which is anchored in bibliographic research, aims to demonstrate that the algorithmic platforms are propitious spaces to disinformation, given the way their technological characteristics are instrumentalized by their business model, resulting in the prevalence of the algorithm value over the news value. In order to apprehend such instrumentalization, as well as its effects on disinformation, the modus operandi of platforms is analyzed under four aspects. Unequal omnimediation is the proliferation of instances of mediation, each user acting to some extent as an influencer, while also being influenced by countless others. The arena of attention consists of the condition of permanent dispute among users, which supersedes the public sphere. Calibrated exposure designates – in lieu of selective exposure, echo chambers or filter bubbles – the weighted targeting of the content displayed to each user. And hybrid war machines are destabilizing mobilizations whose command is beyond the platforms’ control.

Author Biography

Julio Cesar Lemes de Castro, Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Pesquisador do Laboratório de Teoria Social, Filosofia e Psicanálise (Latesfip-USP). Doutor em Comunicação e Semiótica (PUC-SP), com pós-doutorados em Psicologia Social (USP), Comunicação e Cultura (UFRJ) e Comunicação e Cultura (Uniso). Site acadêmico: http://www.jclcastro.com.br/

References

BARTHEL, Michael; MITCHELL, Amy; HOLCOMB, Jesse. Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Pew Research Center, Dec 15, 2016.

BENKLER, Yochai; FARIS, Robert; ROBERTS, Hal. Network propaganda: manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

BERGER, Jonah; MILKMAN, Katherine L. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, v. 49, n. 2, p. 192-205, 2012.

BISHOP, Sophie. Algorithmic experts: selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society, p. 1-11, Jan-Mar 2020.

BLEX, Chris; YASSERI, Taha. Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2020.

BRADSHAW, Samantha; HOWARD, Philip N. The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Working Paper 2019.2. Oxford: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2019.

BRUNS, Axel. Are filter bubbles real? Cambridge (UK) and Medford: Polity Press, 2019.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Das massas às redes: comunicação e mobilização política. In: JESUS, Eduardo; TRINDADE, Eneus; JANOTTI, Jeder; ROXO, Marcos (Org.). Reinvenção comunicacional da política: modos de habitar e desabitar o século XXI. Salvador: EDUFBA/Brasília: Compós, 2016a. p. 149-166.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Social networks as dispositives of neoliberal governmentality. Journal of Media Critiques, v. 2, n. 7, p. 85-102, 2016b.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Redes sociais como modelo de governança algorítmica. Matrizes, v. 12, n. 2, p. 165-191, maio/agosto de 2018.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Plataformas algorítmicas: interpelação, perfilamento e performatividade. Revista Famecos, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1-24, setembro/dezembro de 2019a.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Da lógica editorial à lógica algorítmica da notícia. Conexão – Comunicação e Cultura, v. 18, n. 36, p. 36-56, julho/dezembro de 2019b.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Máquinas de guerra híbrida em plataformas algorítmicas. E-Compós, v. 23, p. 1-29, 2020a.

CASTRO, Julio Cesar Lemes de. Neoliberalismo, guerra híbrida e a campanha presidencial de 2018. Comunicação & Sociedade, v. 42, n. 1, p. 261-291, janeiro-abril de 2020b.

COSENTINO, Gabriele. Social media and the post-truth world order: the global dynamics of disinformation. Cham: Palgrave Pivot, 2020.

DAVISON, W. Phillips. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1-15, Spring 1983.

DEAN, Jodi. Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2009.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mille plateaux: capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Minuit, 1980.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Naissance de la biopolitique: cours au Collège de France, 1978-1979. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil, 2004.

FREUD, Sigmund. Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. In: FREUD, Sigmund. Gesammelte Werke, dreizehnter Band: Jenseits des Lustprinzips / Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse / Das Ich und das Es. 5. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1967. p. 71-161.

GALLUP/KNIGHT FOUNDATION. An online experimental platform to assess trust in the media. Knigh Foundation, 2018. Disponível em: https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KnightFoundation_NewsLens1_Client_Report_070918_ab.pdf. Acesso em 30 set. 2020.

GALTUNG, Johan; RUGE, Mari Holmboe. The structure of foreign news: the presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, v. 2, n. 1, p. 64-91, 1965.

GRAHAM, Todd; WRIGHT, Scott. Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of “superparticipants”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v. 19, n. 3, p. 625-642, Apr 2014.

GUESS, Andrew M.; NYHAN, Brendan; REIFLER, Jason. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf. Acesso em 30 set. 2020.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuaufl. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, v. 16, n. 4, p. 411-426, Nov 2006.

HARCUP, Tony; O’NEILL, Deirdre. What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, v. 2, n. 2, p. 261-280, 2001.

HARCUP, Tony; O’NEILL, Deirdre. What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, v. 18, n. 12, p. 1470-1488, 2017.

HOLMES, David. Whisper EIC: “It’s not important if a story’s real, the only thing that really matters is whether people click on it”. Pando, Jul 31, 2014.

HUNTER, James D. Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books, 1991.

IPSOS. Fake news, filter bubbles, post-truth and trust: a study across 27 countries. Ipsos, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2018-08/fake_news-report.pdf. Acesso em 30 set. 2020.

JANG, S. Mo; KIM, Joon K. Third person effects of fake news: fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 80, p. 295-302, Mar 2018.

KATZ, Elihu; LAZARSFELD, Paul Felix. Personal influence. New York: Free Press, 1955.

LAZARSFELD, Paul Felix; BERELSON, Bernard; GAUDET, Hazel. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.

LEWIN, Kurt. Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, n. 108, p. 35-65, Oct 1943.

McCOY, Terrence. For the “new yellow journalists,” opportunity comes in clicks and bucks. The Washington Post, Nov 20, 2016.

McPHERSON, Miller; SMITH-LOVIN, Lynn; COOK, James M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 27, n. 1, p. 415-444, Aug 2001.

MOCANU, Delia et al. Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 51, p. 1198-1204, 2015.

MOHAMMED, Shaheed N. Conspiracy theories and flat Earth videos on YouTube. Journal of Social Media in Society, v. 8, n. 2, p. 84-102, Fall 2019.

MUNGER, Kevin. All the news that’s fit to click: the economics of clickbait media. Political Communication, v. 37, n. 3, p. 376-397, 2020.

PARISER, Eli. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.

RHEINGOLD, Howard. The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: HarperPerennial, 1994.

SCHERER, Éric. La révolution numérique. Paris: Dalloz, 2009.

SILVERMAN, Craig; ALEXANDER, Lawrence. How teens in the Balkans are duping Trump supporters with fake news. Buzzfeed, 2016. Acesso em 8 out. 2021.

SPOHR, Dominic. Fake news and ideological polarization: filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review, v. 34, n. 3, p. 150-160, 2017.

SRNICEK, Nick. Platform capitalism. Cambridge (UK) and Malden: Polity, 2017.

STEINBERG, Tom. Facebook post. Facebook, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/tom.steinberg.503/posts/10157028566365237. Acesso em 30 set. 2020.

STROUD, Natalie Jomini. Niche news: the politics of news choice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007.

TARDE, Gabriel. L’opinion et la foule. 3ème ed. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1910.

TÖRNBERG, Petter. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 9, 2018.

VOSOUGHI, Soroush; ROY, Deb; ARAL, Sinan. The spread of true and false news online. Science, v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1146-1151, Mar 9, 2018

WHITE, David Manning. The “gate keeper”: a case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quaterly, v. 27, n. 4, p. 383-390, 1950.

Published

2022-01-03