Critique of the techno-feudal allegory: digital platforms, value, and fetishism in contemporary capitalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0259.2025.e107246

Keywords:

technofeudalism, digital plataforms, value theory, fetishism, surplus value

Abstract

This article critically analyzes the thesis of technofeudalism, which proposes the emergence of a new mode of production centered on the algorithmic domination of digital platforms. It adopts an immanent analysis of the works of authors such as Varoufakis, Durand, and Dean, confronted with Marxian political economy critique. The study investigates whether these formulations fall into theoretical fetishism by mistaking apparent forms of domination for ruptures with the foundations of capitalism. The results indicate that, far from replacing labor exploitation and surplus value production, digital platforms intensify historically developed forms of commercial, interest-bearing, and fictitious capital. It concludes that Marxist categories remain essential for understanding the logic of value valorization in contemporary capitalism and that the technofeudal allegory obscures rather than clarifies current mechanisms of labor expropriation.

Author Biography

Thiago Dutra Hollanda de Rezende, Universidade do Distrito Federal (UnDF)

Doutor em Política Social pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) e Professor de Educação Superior da Universidade do Distrito Federal (UnDF).

References

ALPHABET INC. Annual Report 2024. Mountain View: Alphabet Inc., 2025. Disponível em: https://abc.xyz/assets/e1/57/8a65483e43feaa709f6cc5cc0737/annualreport2024-web.pdf. Acesso em: 25 maio 2025.

AMAZON.COM Inc. Form 10-K: Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Seattle: Amazon Investor Relations, 1 abr. 2025. Disponível em: https://ir.aboutamazon.com/sec-filings/sec-filings-details/default.aspx?FilingId=18165478. Acesso em: 26 maio 2025.

DEAN, J. Capital’s Grave: Neofeudalism and the New Class Struggle. London; New York: Verso, 2025.

DURAND, C. Tecnofeudalismo: crítica de la economía digital. 1. ed. Adrogué: La Cebra; Donostia: Kaxilda, 2021.

FUMAGALLI, A.; LUCARELLI, S. Cognitive capitalism, an empirical and theoretical analysis. In: FUMAGALLI, A. et al. Cognitive capitalism, welfare and labour: the Commonfare hypothesis. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

MARX, K. O capital: crítica da economia política. Livro I: O processo de produção do capital. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013.

MARX, K. O capital: crítica da economia política. Livro II: o processo de circulação do capital. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.

MARX, K. O capital: crítica da economia política. Livro III: o processo global da produção capitalista. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2017.

MOULIER-BOUTANG, Y. Cognitive capitalism. Translated by Ed Emery. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.

ROTTA, T.; TEIXEIRA, R. The commodification of knowledge and information. In: VIDAL, M.; SMITH, T.; ROTTA, T.; PREW, P. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

SRNICEK, N. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.

VAROUFAKIS, Y. Tecnofeudalismo: o que matou o capitalismo. São Paulo: Planeta do Brasil, 2025.

VERCELLONE, C.; GIULIANI, A. An introduction to cognitive capitalism: a Marxist approach. In: FUMAGALLI, A. et al. Cognitive capitalism, welfare and labour: the Commonfare hypothesis. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

WARK, M. Capital is dead. London; New York: Verso, 2019.

Published

2026-01-28

Issue

Section

Thematic space: Technology, digitization of the State, and social policies