Politicization in politicians conditions: some analytical problems and results of work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p36Abstract
This paper examines some implications of the study of politicization, with an emphasis on the possibilities and limits of peripheral conditions. For this, the first part of the text presents some general elements related to the definitions proposed by Jacques Lagroye, especially emphasizing the theoretical bases and the underlying epistemological problems. The second part of the exposition uses results from investigations conducted in the last decades in different empirical universes in Brazil that directly or indirectly cover issues related to politicization or related issues. From these, problems arising from the difficulties caused by the lack of autonomy of the Social Sciences and, on the other hand, from the challenges related to socio-historical particularities are revealed. Since, in these contexts, “politics” is given greater weight in social structuring, as well as its principles of definition are diverse and multiple, besides there are multiple circuits, with distinct principles of selection, that circumscribe something that can be considered as of the “political” order.References
Aït-Aoudia, M. et al. Contribution à une histoire sociale de la conception lagroyenne de
la politisation. Critique Internationale, n. 48, p. 207-220, 2010.
______. et al. Indicateurs et vecteurs de la politisation des individus: les vertus heuristiques du
croisement des regards. Critique internationale, n. 50, p. 9-20, 2011.
ALMOND, G. A. A comparative study of interest groups and the political process. The
American Political Science Review, v. LII, n. 1, p. 270-282, 1958.
______. Separate tables: schools and sects in political science. Political Science and Politics,
v. 21, n. 4, p. 828-842, 1988b.
______. The return of the State. American Political Science Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 853-874,
sept. 1988.
______. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. London: Sage
Publications, 1990.
Badie, B. Le modèle centre-péripherie. In: ______. Le Développment Politique. Paris:
Economica, 1994. p. 111-133.
______.; Hermet , G. Política Comparada. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1993.
Best, H.; Cotta , M. (Ed.). Parlamentary Representatives in Europe 1848-2000:
Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2000.
Birnbaum, P. Les Sommets de l’État: Essai sur l´élite du pouvoir em France. Paris:
Éditions du Seuil, 1994.
Bourdieu, P. La représentation politique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,
v. 36-37, p. 3-24, fév./mars 1981.
Braud, P. De pouvoir en général au pouvoir politique. In: Grawit z, M.; Leca, J. (Dir.).
Traité de Science Politique; La Science Politique, Science Sociale; L´Ordre Politique.
Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1985. v. 1. p. 335-393.
Coradini, O. L. Ambivalências na representação de classe e a noção de “trabalhador rural”.
In: Nava rro, Z. (Org.). Política, Protesto e Cidadania no Campo. Porto Alegre: Editora
da Universidade/UFRGS, 1996. p. 171-188.
______. Grandes famílias e elite “profissional” na medicina no Brasil. História, Ciências,
Saúde – Manguinhos, v. 3, n. 3, p. 425-466, 1997.
______. Em Nome de Quem? Recursos Sociais no Recrutamento de Elites Políticas. Rio de
Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 2001.
______. Escolarização, militantismo e mecanismos de “participação” política. In:______.
Como se Fazem Eleições no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumaré, 2002. p. 103-153.
______. As missões da “cultura” e da “política”: confrontos e reconversões de elites culturais e
políticas no Rio Grande do Sul (1920-1960). Estudos Históricos, n. 32, p. 125-144, 2003.
______. Representação profissional e elites políticas no Brasil no período recente. Política &
Sociedade – Revista de Sociologia Política, v. 5, n. 9, p. 123-161, out. 2006.
______. Les participants et les organizateurs du Forum Social Mondial: la diversité du
militantisme. Cultures & Conflits, n. 70, p. 153-175, 2008b.
______. Politização de interesses através de frentes parlamentares. Tomo, ano X, n. 13,
p. 75-92, jul./dez. 2008.
______. Recursos de origem, investimentos e expectativas de retribuição na militância no
MST. Espacio Abierto – Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología, v. 19, n. 3, p. 445-473, jul./
sept. 2010.
______. Representação política e de interesses: bases associativas dos deputados federais de
-2007. Sociedade e Estado, v. 26, n. 1, p. 197-220, jan./abr. 2011.
______. Resources of origin, investments and expectations of rewards in the militancy of the
Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST). International Review of Sociology, v. 21, n. 1,
p. 67-87, march 2011b.
______. Conselhos regionais de desenvolvimento, orçamento participativo e confrontos entre
concepções de “participação” – o caso do Rio Grande do Sul. In: Heredia, M. B. A. de;
Palmeira, M. (Org.). Política, Governo e Participação Popular: Conselhos, orçamento
participativo e outras experiências. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras, 2012b. p. 65-110.
______. Cargos e funções públicas e candidaturas eleitorais. Sociedade e Estado, v. 27, n. 3,
p. 689-708, set./dez. 2012.
COTTA , M.; Almeida, P. T. de. De serviteurs de l’État à représentants élus: les
parlementaires originaires du secteur public en Europe. Pôle Sur, n. 21, p. 101-122, 2004.
DesrosiÈres, A. Gouverner Par les Nombres: L’Argument Statistique II. Paris: Presses
de l’École des Mines, 2008.
Dezala y, Y.; Garth, B. G. The Internationalisation of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economist
and the Contest to Transform Latin America States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Dogan, M. Les professions propices à la carrière politique. Osmose, filières e viviers.
In: Offerlé, M. (Ed.). La Profession politique: XIXe-XXe siècles. Paris: Belin, 1999.
p. 135-169.
Duchesne, S.; Haegel, F. La politisation des discussions, au croisement des logiques
de spécialisation et de conflictualisation. Revue française de science politique, v. 54, p. 877-
, 2004.
Eymeri, J. M. Frontières ou marches? De la contribuition de la haute administration à
la production du politique. In: LAGROYE, J. (Dir.). La Politisation. Paris: Belin, 2003.
p. 47-77.
Garrigou, A. Le vote et la vertu: Comment les Français sont devenus électeurs. Paris:
Presses de Science Po., 1992.
Gaxie, D. et al. (Ed.). Le “Social” Transfiguré. Sur la répresentation politique des
préoccupaions “sociales”. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.
______. Le cens caché. 3. ed. Paris: Seuil, 1978.
______. Rétributions du militantisme et paradoxes de l’action collective, Swiss 1. Political
Science Review, vol. 11, p. 157-188, mar. 2005.
Hamidi, C. Éléments pour une approche interactionniste de la politisation. Engagement
associatif et rapport au politique dans des associations locales issues de l’immigration. Revue
Française de Science Politique, v. 56, p. 5-25, 2006.
Hammersley, M. The Limits of Social Sciences: Causal Explanation and Value
Relevance. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2014.
HIRSCHMAN, A. O. Journeys toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-Making in
Latin America. New York: The Twentieth Century Found, 1963.
Jobert, B.; Muller, P. L’État en Action: Politiques Publiques et Corporatismes. Paris:
Presses Universitaires de France, 1987.
Lac roix, B. Ordre politique et ordre social; Objetivisme, objetivation et analyse politique.
In: Grawit z, M.; Leca, J. (Dir.). Traité de Science Politique; La Science Politique,
Science Sociale; L´Ordre Politique. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1985. v. 1.
p. 469-565.
Lag roye, J. La légitimation. In: Grawit z, M.; Leca, J. (Dir.). Traité de Science
Politique; La Science Politique, Science Sociale; L´Ordre Politique. Paris: Presses
Universitaire de France, 1985. v. 1. p. 395-467.
______. Sociologie Politique. Paris: Preses des la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques,
______. François, B.; Sawic ki, F. Sociologie Politique. 4e. édition revue et mise à
jour. Paris: Presses de Science Po et Dalloz, 2002.
______. (Ed.). La Politisation. Paris: Belin, 2003a.
______. Le processus de politisation. In: ______. (Ed.). La Politisation. Paris: Belin, 2003b.
p. 359-372.
______.; Offerlé, M. (Dir.). Sociologie de l’Institution. Paris: Belin, 2010.
Lascoumes, P. Les compromis parlementaires, combinaisons de surpolitisation et de souspolitisation.
L’adoption des lois de réforme du Code pénal (décembre 1992) et de création
du Pacs (novembre 1999). Revue Française de Science Politique, v. 59, p. 455-478, 2009.
Lowi , T. j. The return of the State: critiques. American Political Science Review, v. 82,
n. 3, 875-891, sept. 1988.
______. The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study. The American
Political Science Review, v. 86, n. 1, p.1-7, mar. 1992.
Martins, L. Estado Capitalista e Burocracia no Brasil Pós 64. Rio de Janeiro: Editora
Paz e Terra, 1985.
Offerlé, M. Capacités politiques et politisations: faire voter et voter, xixe-xxe siècles (1).
Genèses, n. 67, p. 131-149, 2007.
Pécaut, D. Os Intelectuais e a Política no Brasil: Entre o Povo e a Nação. Rio de Janeiro:
Editora Ática, 1990.
Saint Martin, M. de. A propos d’une rencontre entre chercheurs; Sciences sociales et
politique au Brésil. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, v. 71, n. 1, p. 129-134, 1988.
Santo s, W. dos. A trágica condição da política social. In: Abranches, S.; Santo s,
W. dos; Coimbra, M. (Org.). Política Social e Combate à pobreza. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge
Zahar Ed., 1987. p. 33-63.
Schmitte r, P. C. Interest conflict and political change in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford
University Press, 1971.
______.; Lehmb ruch , G. (Ed.). Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. London:
Sage, 1979.
Sigal, S. Le Rôle des intellectuels en amérique latine: la dérive des intellectuels en
Argentine. Paris: Harmattan, 1996.
Talpin , J. Ces moments qui façonnent les hommes. Éléments pour une approche pragmatiste
de la compétence civique. Revue Française de Science politique, v. 60, p. 91-115, 2010.
Touraine, A. Palavra e Sangue: Política e Sociedade na América Latina. Campinas:
Editora da UNICAMP, 1988.
WACQU ANT, L. J. D.; CALHOUN, C. J. Intérêt, rationalité et culture; A propos d’un
récent débat sur la théorie de l’action. Actes de la Recherche em Sciences Sociales, v. 78,
p. 41-60, 1989.
Weber, M. Economia y Sociedad: Esbozo de Sociología Comprensiva. México: Fondo de
Cultura Económica, 1984.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The articles and other work published in Política & Sociedade, a journal associated to the Graduate Program in Sociology at UFSC, are the property of the journal. A new publication of the same text, whether by the initiative of the author or third parties, must indicate that it was previously published in this journal, citing the edition and date of publication.
This work is licensed under the Creative Common License
