Paul F. Lazarsfeld: founder of a scientific multinational

Authors

  • Michael Pollak Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n38p94

Abstract

In this article, the author examines the social factors which determined the career of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, by attempting to determine the factors of discontinuity and those of continuity beyond discontinuity. Firstly, he analyses the youth of P.F. Lazarsfeld, in relation to the socialist and Jewish milieux of Vienna. He then proceeds to examine differential reactions to the problem of emigration, basing his study particularly on a comparison of the opposing attitudes of Adorno and P.F. Lazarsfeld. He then analyses the specific abilities which have enabled P.F. Lazarsfeld to father a new form of intellectual enterprise, relying on a rational division of labour and an almost industrial organization of intellectual output, this latter being achieved by means of a positivist methodology which enables him to segment and mechanize the various operations of the intellect. To conclude, he examines the strategies by which P.F. Lazarsfeld, supported by the policy of cultural missions, has contributed to the exportation, on the scale of Eastern and Western Europe, of American empiricist sociology, while at the same time promoting a model of the relationships between social research and economic and political agents as elaborated in the United States during the nineteen twenties and thirties, via a strategy of capturing new intellectual markets at the very time when strategies of modernisation and ideological reconquest where taking place in Europe.

Author Biography

Michael Pollak, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Michel Pollak foi directeur de recherche no Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).

References

ADORNO, T. W. Scientific Experiences of a European Scholar In: FLEMING, D.; BAILYN, B. The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America 1930-1960. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, 1969.

ADLER, F. Zum 70. Geburtstag von Ernst Mach. Der Kampf, (S.l.), v. 1, n. 5, p. 231–240, 1907.

______. Machs Uberwindung des mechanischen Materialismus. Wien, 1918.

______. Ortszeit, Systemzeit, Zonenzeit und das ausgezeichnete Bezugssystem der Elektrodynamik. Wien, 1920.

ARON, Raymond. Sociologie et industrie: une interrogation mutuelle. L’expansion de la recherche scientifique, Paris, n. 19, p. 1–68, 1963.

BAUER, Otto, Die Sozialdemokratie und die Nationalitätenfrage. Wien: Vorwärts, 1907.

BOURDET, Y. (éd), Otto Bauer et la révolution. Paris: EDI, 1968.

BOURDIEU, P. Le champ scientifique, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, Paris, v. 2, n. 2–3, juin 1976.

BRAUNTHAL, J. Victor und Friedrich Adler. Wien, 1964.

BUNZL, J. Klassenkampf in der Diaspora, Zur Geschichte der judischen Arbeiterbewegung. Wien: Europaverlag, 1976.

FEUER, L. S. The Social Roots of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Annals of science, (S.l.), v. 27, n. 3, p. 277–298, 1971.

FUNDAÇÃO FORD. The Foundations Activities in Europe. New York: Ford Foundation, March 1968. (Arquivos da Fundação Ford).

FUNDAÇÃO FORD, Carta de Lazarsfeld a Sheppard Stone de 22/06/1959 (Arquivos da Fundação Ford).

GOLD, H. Geschichte der Juden in Wien. Tel Aviv, 1966.

GOODE, W. J.; HATT, P. K., Methods in Social Research. New York: Mac Graw Hill, 1952.

HAUTMANN, H. Die verlorene Republik. Am. Beispiel Deutsch-Österreichs. Wien: Europa Verlag, 1971.

HEMPEL, C. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University Press, 1952.

HORKHEIMER, M. Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung, 1937.

p. HOROWITZ, I. L. Foundations of Political Sociology. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

INSTITUT FUR JUDAISTIK DER UNIVERSITÄT WIEN (Éd.). Das österreichische Judentum, Voraussetzungen und Geschichte. Wien-Munchen: Jugend und Volk, 1974.

JAY, M. The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Francfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950. London: Heinemann, 1973.

KARL, B. D. Executive Reorganization and Reform in the New Deal: The Genesis of Administrative Management. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963.

KNOLL, R. Die Emigration aus Österreich im 20 Jahrhundert. vol. 8./12. Contribuição ao Colóquio «Deux fois l’Autriche, après 1918 et après 1945». Rouen, novembre 1977.

LASSWELL, H. D. (Éd.). The Policy Sciences. Stanford Universit Press. Stanford, 1951.

LAZARSFELD, P. F. Gemeinschaftserziehung durch Erziehungsgemeinschaften. Wien, 1925.

______. Die Psychologie in Hendrik de Mans Marx Kritik. Der Kampf, (S.l.), Jahrgang XX, n. 6, p. 1–273, june 1927.

______. An Episode in the History of Social Research: a Memoir, In: FLEMING, D.; BAILYN, B. The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America 1930-1960. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1969.

______. The Art of Asking Why. National Marketing Review, (S.l.), v. 1, n. 1, p. 26–38, Summer 1935.

______. Kölner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. éd. 4. Westdeutscher Verlag Editora: Dusseldorf, 1976.

______. Working with Merton. In: COSER, L.A. (Éd.). The Ideal of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Yovanovitch, 1975.

______. Sociology. In: UNESCO. Main Trends of Research in the Social and Human Sciences. vol 1, Paris: Mouton, 1970.

LAZARSFELD, S. Wie die Frau den Mann erlebt. Wien: Leipzig; Verlag fur Sexualwissenchaft, 1931.

LAZARSFELD, P. F.; STOUFFER, S. Research Memorandum of the Family in the Depression, New York: Social Science Research Council, 1937.

LAZARSFELD, P. F.; BERELSON, B.; GAUDET, H. The People’s Choice; how the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell; Sloan and Pearce, 1944.

LESER, N. Zwischen Reformismus und Bolschewismus. Der Austromarxismus in Theorie und Praxis, Wien: Europa Verlag, 1968.

MAITRON, J.; HAUPT, G. (Org). Dictionnaire biographique du mouvement ouvrier. vol. I. Autriche; Paris: Les Éd. Ouvrières, 1971.

MAGAT, R. Foundation Reporting. Address presented, before the nineth Biennal Conference on Charitable Foundations. New York University, may 19 1969.

MERTON, R. K. The Role of Applied Social Science in the Formation of Policy: A Research Memorandum, Journal for the Philosophy of Science, New York, n. 16, p. 161–181, July 1949.

MERTON, R. K.; LAZARSFELD, P. F. Continuities in Social Research, Studies in the Scope and Method of the American Soldier. Glencoe, Free Press, 1950.

MORRISON, D. E. Kultur and Culture: the case of Theodor W. Adorno et Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Social Research, v. 45, n. 2, 1978.

_____. Paul Lazarsfeld 1901-1976. vol. 1./2./3. A Tribute, Österreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 1967.

ORGEL, R. Alfred Adler, Der Mann und sein Werk. Wien: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1956. OCDE. Les sciences sociales et la politique des gouvernements. Paris: OCDE, 1965.

ORLANS, H. The Advocacy of Social Science in Europe and America. Minerva, (S.l.), XIV, n. 1, p. 6–36, 1976.

POLLAK, Michael. La planification des sciences sociales. Actes de la recherche en Sciences Sociales, Paris, v. 2, n. 2-3, p.105–121, juin, 1976.

POPPER, K.R. Uber die Unwiderlegbarkeit philosophischer Theorien, In: SZCEZESNY, G. (Org.). Club Voltaire. vol. I. Aufklärung: Jahrbuch fur kritische Aufklärung, 1963.

SELLTITZ, C. Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Mac Graw Hill, 1959. 622 p.

SPAULDING, E. W. The Quiet Invadors, The Story of the Austrian Impact upon America. Wien, 1968

STOUFFER, S. A. The American Soldier. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II. tomos 4. Princeton University Press, 1949-1950.

TRUMAN, D. B. Report on an Informal Inquiry into Developing Relations among Social Scientists in Europe. February 1963. (Arquivos da Fundação Ford).

UNESCO, Main Trends of Research in the Social and Human Sciences. vol. 1. Paris: Mouton, 1970.

TESTENOIRE, Marie Louise. Freud et Vienne en 1900. Critique, Vienne, (S.n.), p. 339–340, 1975.

ZETTERBERG, H. L. On Theory and Verification in Sociology. New York: Free Press, 1966.

Published

2018-06-08

Issue

Section

Thematic Dossier