Methodological Challenges in Social Movement Studies: a review of papers presented at academic conferences in Brazil (2011-2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2023.e85503Keywords:
Methodology, Social movements, Methods, TechniquesAbstract
In the past years, the field of studies about social movements in Brazil has been revitalized through new empirical and theoretical problems. Given this context, this paper presents the following questions. Which research methods and techniques have been mobilized by social movement scholars and how they have been presented and discussed in the academic production on this subject? What are the methodological challenges for the study of social movements in contemporary Brazil? To answer these questions, this paper presents a systematic review of the texts presented in research committees dedicated to this subject during the Annual Meetings of ANPOCS and the Brazilian Congresses of Sociology between 2011 and 2020. The results show that the analyzed papers tend to be characterized by low transparency in the description of methodological choices and by low methodological diversity, focusing on qualitative approaches and prioritizing the use of observation, documental research, and interviews as research techniques.
References
ABERS, R. (org.) Ativismo institucional: criatividade e luta na burocracia brasileira. Brasília: Editora UnB, 2021.
BARBERIA, L. G.; GODOY, S. R.; BARBOZA, D. P. Novas Perspectivas sobre o “Calcanhar Metodológico”: O Ensino de Métodos de Pesquisa em Ciência Política no Brasil. Teoria & Sociedade, v. 22, p. 156-184, 2014.
CANO, I. Nas trincheiras do método: o ensino da metodologia das ciências sociais no Brasil. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, ano 14, n. 31, p. 94-119, set./dez. 2012.
GURZA LAVALLE, A.; CARLOS, E.; DOWBOR, M.; SZWAKO, J. (org.). Movimentos sociais e institucionalização: políticas sociais, raça e gênero no Brasil pós-transição. Rio de Janeiro: EDUERJ, 2019.
MURTONEN, M.; LEHTINEN, E. Difficulties experienced by education and sociology students in quantitative methods courses. Studies in Higher Education, v. 28, n. 2, p. 171-185, 2003.
NEIVA, P. Revisitando o calcanhar de Aquiles metodológico das ciências sociais no Brasil. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, n. 79, p. 65-83, 2015.
NICOLAU, J.; OLIVEIRA, L. Political science in Brazil: an analysis of academic articles (1966-2015). Sociologia & Antropologia, v. 7, p. 371-393, 2017.
PEREIRA, M. M.; SILVA, M. K. Para além dos movimentos sociais: reflexões sobre a literatura brasileira da década de 2010. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, n. 58, v. 1, p.11-23, 2022.
ROSSI, F. (org.). Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
SAINZ, N.; SILVA, R. da; CODATO, A. Profile Analysis of Political Science Theses and Dissertations in Brazil (2013-2020). In: Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política, Goiânia, 13., 2022. Anais eletrônicos [...]. Goiânia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4565. Acesso em: 4 jan. 2022.
SZWAKO, J.; DOWBOR, M.; ARAÚJO, R. A produção de artigos acadêmicos sobre movimentos sociais publicados nos periódicos brasileiros (2000-2017): tendências e inovações. BIB, n. 92, p.1-22, 2020.
SILVA, M. K. De volta aos movimentos sociais? Reflexões a partir da literatura brasileira recente. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, v. 46, n. 1, p. 2-9, 2010.
THIES, C. G.; HOGAN, R. E. The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics, v. 28, n. 2, p. 293-297, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles and other work published in Política & Sociedade, a journal associated to the Graduate Program in Sociology at UFSC, are the property of the journal. A new publication of the same text, whether by the initiative of the author or third parties, must indicate that it was previously published in this journal, citing the edition and date of publication.
This work is licensed under the Creative Common License