Neuroimaging and the Search for Philosophical Groundings in Language Processing Studies

Laura Niño-Buitrago; Jonathan Restrepo-Rodas; Mercedes Suárez de la Torre; Dillis Eliana Jiménez-Gutiérrez

doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e107229

Authors

Laura Niño-Buitrago Universidad del Valle https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-500X
Jonathan Restrepo-Rodas Universidad del Valle https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-1774
Mercedes Suárez de la Torre Universidad Autonoma de Manizales https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1223-2146
Dillis Eliana Jiménez-Gutiérrez University of Quindío https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4698-0107

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e107229

Keywords:

Neurophilosophy, Polysemic Sentence Processing, Content Validity, Modality, Modal Logic

Abstract

Neuroimaging-based language studies face the challenge of properly selecting linguistic units to be used as stimuli. While the selection of simple terms is relatively straightforward, abstract concepts and polysemic markers pose greater difficulties, potentially affecting the validity of the association between stimuli and the neurocognitive structures. This study addresses this problem by focusing on modality, specifically through the validation of polysemic statements using the verb tocar in Colombian Spanish. A set of modal logic proofs was developed based on existing theoretical definitions. These definitions were coupled with diverse senses of tocar as expressed in linguistic terms, formalized as axioms and then expressed as formal deductive proofs to support the categorization of statements. This process helps in maintaining the philosophical contribution to studies in the neurocognitive realm. Through an elicitation task and expert validation, a final set of 198 statements was consolidated, achieving fair agreement according to Fleiss’ Kappa statistic. It is concluded that these statements contribute to enhancing the validity of neurocognitive lexical decision tasks involving polysemic markers and their neurocognitive correlates. This work provides a deductive and replicable methodological framework that can be applied in studies framed in empirical, analytic and experimental philosophy, neurophilosophy and Cognitive science.

Author Biography

Dillis Eliana Jiménez-Gutiérrez, University of Quindío

References

Almeida, R.; Manouilidou, C. 2015. Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing. London: Springer.

Baker, P. 2018. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barrio-Cantalejo, I.M.; Simón-Lorda, P.; Melguizo, M.; Escalona, I.; Marijuán, M.I.; Hernando, P. 2008. Validation of the INFLESZ scale to evaluate readability of texts aimed at the patient. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra 31(2): 135-152.

Beres, A. 2017. Time is of the Essence: A Review of Electroencephalography (EEG) and Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) in Language Research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 42: 247–255.

Bornkessel, I.; Staub, A.; Schlesewsky, M. 2016. The Timecourse of Sentence Processing in the Brain. In: G. Hickok; S. Small (ed.), Neurobiology of Language, p.607-621. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Bowen, A. 2019. 'You Don’t Have to Say Anything': Modality and Consequences in Conversations About the Right to Silence in the Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39(3): 347-374.

Churchland, P.S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Churchland, P.S. 2002. Brain-Wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: Th MIT Press.

Churchland, P.S. 2013. Touching a Nerve: The Self as Brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Creswell, J.; Poth, C. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Escobar-Pérez J.; Cuervo-Martínez Á. 2008. Content Validity and Expert Judgment: An Approach to Its Use. Av In Measurement 6: 27-36.

Estany, A. 2022a. Naturalización de la ética y la moral. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso 19: 293-312.

Estany, A. 2022b. Guest Editors’ Introduction: Challenges from Neuroscience to Philosophy. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso 20: 9-12.

Feldman, J.; Narayanan, S.; Lakoff, G. 2000. Active Schemas for Generation, Recognition, and Understanding of Action. International Conference on Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Language and Cognition, Delmenhorst.

Felisatti, A.; Fischer, M-H. 2024. Experimental Methods in Embodied Cognition How Cognitive Psychologists Approach Embodiment. London and New York: Routledge.

Fernández, J. 2014a. Aspectos cognitivos y construccionales de la evolución semántica del verbo tocar. Anuari de Filologia Estudis de Lingüística 4: 93-118.

Fleiss, J. L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76(5): 378–382.

Frijters, S.; Van De Putte, F. 2021. Classical term-modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 31(4): 1026-1054.

Ghio, M.; Telamandi, M. 2015. Grounding Sentence Processing in the Sensory-Motor System. In: M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, p.647-661. London: The MIT Press.

Gibbs, R. 2007. Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In: V. Evans; B. Bergen; J. Zinken (ed.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, p.40-56. London: Equinox.

Gillioz, C.; Zufferey, S. 2021. Introduction to Experimental Linguistics. Cognitive Science Series. London: ITSE.

Gisev, N.; Bell, J. S.; Chen, T. F. 2013. Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 9(3): 330-338.

Gosselin, L. 2005. Temporalité et modalité. Bruxelles: Duculot-de Boeck.

Gosselin, L. 2010. Les modalités en français. La validation des représentations. Etudes Chronos. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.

Hagoort, P.; Indefrey, P. 2014. The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience 37: 347-362.

Hauk, O. 2016. What Does It Mean? A Review of the Neuroscientific Evidence for Embodied Lexical Semantics. In: G. Hickok; S. Small (ed.), Neurobiology of Language, p.777-790. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Knobe, J.; Nichols, S. 2008. An experimental philosophy manifesto. In: J. Knobe; S. Nichols (ed.), Experimental philosophy, p.3-14. New York: Oxford University Press.

Larson-Hall, J.; Plonsky, L. 2015. Reporting and Interpreting Quantitative Research Findings: What Gets Reported and Recommendations for the Field. Language Learning 65(1): 127-159.

Loaiza, N.; Ortiz, C.; Restrepo, J. 2022. Estilos de aprendizaje, interculturalidad y modalidades en el texto argumentativo escrito bilingüe. Armenia, Colombia: Editorial Kinesis.

Loewen, S.; Godfroid, A. 2020. Advancing quantitative research methods. In: J. Mckinley; H. Rose (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, p.98-107. New York: Routledge.

Luck, S. 2014. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lupyan, G. 2016. The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning 66(3): 516-553.

Malaia, E.; González, J.; Weber, C.; Talavae, T.; Wilbur, R. 2015. Neural Processing of Verbal Event Structure: Temporal and Functional Dissociation Between Telic and Atelic Verbs. In: R. Almeida; C. Manouilidou (ed.), Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing, p.131-140. London: Springer.

Maldonado-Suárez, N.; Santoyo-Telles, F. 2024. Content validity by expert judgment: Quantitative and qualitative integration in the construction of measurement instruments. REIRE Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació 17(2): 1-19.

Marsden, E. 2020. Methodological transparency in applied linguistics and its consequences for the quality and scope of research. In: J. McKinley; Heath, R. (ed.), Methods in Applied Linguistics, p.15-28. London: Routledge.

Martí, M. A.; Martín-Valdivia, M.; Taulé, M.; Jiménez-Zafra, S.; Nofre, M.; Marsó, L. 2016. Denial in Spanish: Analysis and typology of denial patterns. Natural Language Processing 57: 41-48.

McAlister, A.; Lee, D.; Ehlert, K.; Kajfez, R.; Faber, C.; Kennedy, M. 2017. Qualitative Coding: An Approach to Assess Inter-Rater Reliability. American Society for Engineering Education, Paper ID #18189.

New, B.; Pallier, C.; Ferrand, L.; Matos, R. 2001. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur Internet : LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique 101 : 417–462.

Northoff, G. 2004. What Is Neurophilosophy? A Methodological Account. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35: 91-127.

Nozari, S.; Thompson-Schill, S. 2016. Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Processing of Words and Sentences. In: G. Hickok; S. Small (ed.), Neurobiology of Language, p.569-586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Pallier, C.; Devauchelle, A.; Dehaene, S. 2010. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. PNAS 108(6): 2522-2527.

Proverbio, A.M. 2023. EEG and ERPs in the Study of Language and Social Knowledge. In: P. Boggio; T. Wingenbach; M. da Silveira; E. Comfort; L. Murrins; M. Alves (ed.), Social and Affective Neuroscience of Everyday Human Interaction, p.195-211. Cham: Springer.

Prinz, J. 2008. Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy. In: J. Knobe; S. Nichols (ed.), Experimental philosophy, p.189-208. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pulvermuller, F.; Fadiga, L. 2016. Brain Language Mechanisms Built on Action and Perception. In: G. Hickok; S. Small (ed.), Neurobiology of Language, p.311-321. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Quine, W. V. 1969. Epistemology naturalized. In: Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.

Restrepo Rodas, J.; Niño Buitrago, L.; Suárez, M. 2022. Naturalizing Morality. From Alethic to Deontic and Axiological Values: The Case of Tocar, a Colombian Spanish Verb. Valparaíso: Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 20: 77–99.

Rogalski, C. 2016. Sentence Processing. In: G. Hickok; S. Small (ed.), Neurobiology of Language, p.587-596. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Saldaña, J. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Serratrice, L.; Hervé, C.; Corley, M. 2015. Dislocations in French-English bilingual children: An elicitation study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(5): 987-1000.

Soriano, A. 2014. Design and validation of measurement instruments. Dialogues 8(14): 19-40.

Suárez-Rivero, D. 2024. Is Logic Useful for Doing Philosophy?. Principia 28(1): 1-4.

Supo, J. 2013. Cómo Validar un instrumento. Lima: Biblioteca Nacional de Perú.

Turkeltaub P.; Eden G.; Jones K.; Zeffiro T. 2002. Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 16(3): 765-780.

Vermeiren, H.; Vandendaele, A.; Brysbaert, M. 2023. Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension. Behavior Research Methods 55: 1036-1068.

Wang, H. 2018. Thinking for speaking and gesturing motion events: A typological perspective. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(4): 1-21.

Wu, Q. 2024. Alethic Modality is Deontic. Mind and Language 39(4): 561-577.

Yamada, Y.; Neville, H. 2007. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Research 1130(1): 167-180.

Young, L.; Saxe, R. 2008. The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. Neuroimage 40(4): 1912–1920.

Young, L.; Saxe, R. 2009. An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 21(7): 1396–1405.

Zapico, G.; Vivas, J. 2015. Synonymy from a linguistic-cognitive perspective. Measurement of semantic distance. Onomazein 32, 198-211.