Overinterpreting Logics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2025.e107901Keywords:
Paraconsistent Logic, Dialetheism, Epistemic Interpretation, Modalism, EmpiricismAbstract
Paraconsistent logics, minimally, are not explosive; that is, on these logics, not everything follows from a contradiction of the form ‘A and not-A’. Dialetheists, who argue that some contradictions are true (Priest [2006]), have philosophically interpreted such logics as supporting the existence of true contradictions, since they allow for the possibility of true contradictions without triviality. In this paper, I provide basic criteria for philosophical interpretations of logics and consider the costs of violating such criteria, especially by engaging in logical overinterpretation. I argue that overinterpretation supports metaphysical or epistemological readings of logics that are not called for and that can be resisted on philosophically independent grounds. A more neutral, modalist-empiricist stance toward logics in general, and of paraconsistent logics in particular, is then advanced.
References
Arenhart, J. 2022. Interpreting Philosophical Interpretations of Paraconsistency. Synthese 200: 449. {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03941-2.
Azzouni, J. 2006. Tracking Reason: Proof, Consequence, and Truth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bueno, O. 2006. Why Inconsistency Is Not Hell: Making Room for Inconsistency in Science. In: E. Olsson (ed.) Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Issac Levi, pp.70--86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bueno, O. 2018. Skepticism about A Priori Knowledge. In: D. Machuca; B. Reed (eds.) Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, pp.685--699. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bueno, O. 2021. Modality and the Plurality of Logics. In: O. Bueno; S. Shalkowski (eds.) Handbook of Modality, pp.319--327. London: Routledge.
Bueno, O. 2022. Revising Logics. In J.-Y. Béziau; J.-P. Desclés; A. Moktefi; A. Pascu (eds.) Logic in Question, pp. 303-320. Dordrecht: Birkhäuser.
Bueno, O.; Colyvan, M. 2004. Logical Non-Apriorism and the `Law' of Non-Contradiction. In G. Priest; JC Beall; B. Armour-Garb (eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, pp.156--175. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bueno, O.; Shalkowski, S. 2009. Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind 118: 295--321.
Bueno, O.; Shalkowski, S. 2015. Modalism and Theoretical Virtues: Toward an Epistemology of Modality. Philosophical Studies 172: 671--689.
Bueno, O.; Shalkowski, S. 2020. Troubles with Theoretical Virtues: Resisting Theoretical Utility Arguments in Metaphysics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101: 456--469.
Carnielli, W.; Rodrigues, A. 2019a. An Epistemic Approach to Paraconsistency: A Logic of Evidence and Truth. Synthese 196: 3789--3813.
Carnielli, W.; Rodrigues, A. 2019b. Inferential semantics, Paraconsistency, and Preservation of Evidence. In: C. Baskent; T. M. Ferguson (eds.) Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, pp.165--188. Cham: Springer.
Carnielli, W.; Rodrigues, A. 2020. On Epistemic and Ontological Interpretations of Intuitionistic and Paraconsistent Paradigms. Logic Journal of the IGPL 29: 569--584.
da Costa, N.C.A. 1974. On the Theory of Inconsistent Formal Systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15: 497--510.
da Costa, N.C.A.[2008. Ensaio sobre os Fundamentos da L'ogica. [Essay on the Foundations of Logic.] (Third edition.) S~ao Paulo: Hucitec.
da Costa, N.C.A.; Bueno, O. 2001. Paraconsistency: Towards a Tentative Interpretation. Theoria 16: 119--145.
da Costa, N.C.A.; Krause, D.; Bueno, O. 2007. Paraconsistent Logics and Paraconsistency. In: D. Jacquette (ed.) Philosophy of Logic, pp.791--911. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dummett, M. 2000. Elements of Intuitionism. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Field, H. 1989. Realism, Mathematics, and Modality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Forster, T. 1995. Set Theory with a Universal Set. Second, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, S.; Krause, D. 2006. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heyting, A. 1983[1931]. The Intuitionist Foundations of Mathematics. In: P. Benacerraf; H. Putnam (eds.) Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, pp.52--61. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jech, T. 2003. Set Theory. Third, revised and expanded, edition. Berlin: Springer.
Keefe, R. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambert, K. 2004. Free Logic: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. London: Blackwell.
Linnebo, Ø. 2017. Philosophy of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mares, E. 2004. Semantic Dialetheism. In: G. Priest; JC Beall; B. Armour-Garb (eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, pp.264--275. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McGee, V. 1985. A Counterexample to Modus Ponens. Journal of Philosophy 82: 462--471.
Priest, G. 2006. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Priest, G. 2019. Some Comments and Replies. In: C. Baskent; T. Ferguson (eds.) Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, pp.575--675. Cham: Springer.
Quine, W.V. 1937. New Foundations for Mathematical Logic. American Mathematical Monthly 44: 70--80.
Rédei, M. 1998. Quantum Logic in Algebraic Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shalkowski, S. 1994. The Ontological Ground of the Alethic Modality. Philosophical Review 103: 669--688.
Specker, E. P. 1953. The Axiom of Choice in Quine's New Foundations for Mathematical Logic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 39: 972--975.
Tarski, A. 1936. On the Concept of Logical Consequence. In: A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, pp.409--420. Second edition. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.
van Fraassen, B. 1991. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Otávio Bueno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
