Explanation in Neuroscience: a critical analysis of multinivelar mechanistic-causal model of Carl Craver

Authors

  • Ana Luísa Lamounier Costa Universidade de Brasília Brasília, UnB
  • Samuel Simon Universidade de Brasília Brasília, UnB.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2015v19n1p17

Abstract

The most expressive account of explanations in neuroscience is currently the causal-mechanistic model (MMM model) formulated by Carl Craver. According to him, explanations in neuroscience describe mechanisms, in other words, it points out how parts organize themselves and interact to engender the phenomenon. Furthermore, neuroscience is unified as scientists from different areas that compose it work together to develop mechanisms. This model was extensively discussed in the last years and several criticisms were raised towards it. Still, it remains as the soundest model for explanations in neuroscience nowadays. This paper is presented as a review of this model, as well as the critiques worked out against it and finishes with a brief consideration of the problem of explanation in neuroscience.

Author Biographies

Ana Luísa Lamounier Costa, Universidade de Brasília Brasília, UnB

Graduação em Medicina pela Universidade de Brasília. Médica psiquiatra na Secretaria de Saúde do Distrito Federal. Especialização e Mestrado em Filosofia pela Universidade de Brasília.

Samuel Simon, Universidade de Brasília Brasília, UnB.

Membro do Grupo de Lógica e Filosofia da Ciência e professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia-UnB/CNPq.

Published

2015-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles